See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 09 September 2009
zakim?
<mgylling> I am on another call that will end soon. Participating in IRC in the meanwhile.
OK
<scribe> Scribe: Steven
Shane: We had asked them for an event DOMready rather than PageLoaded
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-DOM-Level-3-Events-20090908/
Shane: Issue 6143
Steven: For XHTML 1.0? They're not going to let us reissue that
<ShaneM> Tracker is at http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/voyager-issues.private
http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-xhtml-minutes
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html
http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-xhtml-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-xhtml-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-xhtml-minutes.html
Those are the meetings where we discussed issues from the tracking system
Steven: I'm assuming we will produce an (automatic) DoC from the discussions above
Shane: We agreed that it was an
error, and that we would fix it in a third edition
... (which this wasn't)
... this is issue 6504
... but now we aren't reissuing, we don't have to worry
... (this is his issue 1)
... Issue 10
<ShaneM> we got your voice mail
Low tech crap
<ShaneM> I can't get it to hang up
Steven: In issue 3 we say that 5th edition is deliberately not used
Shane: Issue 10 is about
normative/non-normative
... let me do a quick diff
... I moved XML Names to normative
Steven: Do we need separate sections for references?
<ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/PER-xhtml11-20090507/
Shane: Issue 6288 addresses this; that's your pointer
Steven: XHTML1 is referenced in
the abstract
... it may have been in section 2.1 originally, which now
references the XHTMLMIME document
Shane: I have moved it to
nonnormative
... Namsespaces are referred to in conformance, that is already
in the Normative refs
Steven: His issue 24
... 1.1 says *and*, print says *or* and basic says
*and/or*.
... I believe *and* is correct
... because if a document conforms to the DTD but not to the
schema, then it contains an error
dammir
Shane: The schema is more
restrictive
... docs that conform to the DTD could fail with the schema,
because of datatype checking
Steven: Is there anything the DTD can check that the schema can't?
Shane: I don't know
... Probably
Steven: Possibly
... Well that wraps it for the issues I had.
... I'll create a new version, and send it round
Shane: I'll try and produce the other DoCs in the interim.
[ADJOURN]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/TH/Th/ Succeeded: s/SH/Sh/ Succeeded: s/TH/Th/ Found Scribe: Steven Inferring ScribeNick: Steven Default Present: McCarron, Steven, +46.7.06.02.aaaa, Markus, Steven.a Present: McCarron Steven +46.7.06.02.aaaa Markus Steven.a Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Sep/0006 Found Date: 09 Sep 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/09-xhtml-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]