See also: IRC log, previous 2009-07-07
RESOLUTION: accept the minutes of last telecon
Guus: what's the status on the language label issues?
Antoine: none of the solutions we proposed was
judged acceptable by the I18N Group, per Felix Sasaki
... so long as the examples continued to use private language subtags
... the I18N Group is very reluctant to permit private language subtags
<Guus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0001.html
<Guus> proposed resolution
Antoine: the last resolution [from 7 July] we
proposed to was to modify the examples to be syntactically correct
... to modify the examples and add a warning that that use may not correspond
to BCP
... but the I18N folk did not accept that proposal
Guus: I'm happy with that
Sean: I'm happy to go with Alistair's suggestion
Tom: I also agree
<Ralph> discussion of symbolic labels
Ralph: I'm ok with dropping it
... maybe we should hear from Margherita first
... There was a desire to use an appropriate mechanism for this
... if we remove the section from the spec we might frustrate these people
who were counting on using this.
Guus: I see five vocabularies that use
notations
... in the implementation report
Ralph: the mail from Margherita in January last year
<Ralph> Margherita's comments on symbolic labels (see 'section 4.4')
<Ralph> does AGROVOC use this private language mechanism?
Ed: I remember this was before we had SKOS-XL
on the table
... SKOS-XL might alleviate some of the problems
Ralph: +1
<Ralph> delete from "Usually a notation system does not have ..." through the end of Example 22.
<TomB> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0026.html - "move in your current time schedule to Recommendation"
<Ralph> original comment from I18N Core
Guus: PROPOSED to resolve ISSUE-224 by deleting the final paragraph of section 6.5.4 (from "Usually a notation system does not have...") and example 22
<Ralph> +1
<edsu> +1
RESOLVED to resolve ISSUE-224 by deleting the final paragraph of section 6.5.4 (from "Usually a notation system does not have...") and example 22
ACTION: Alistair to respond to Felix and implement the changes resulting from our resolution to ISSUE-224 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action01]
Guus: consider timing w.r.t. Recommendation
... I saw some reference to 18 August
Ralph: we ought to have a formal acceptance from I18N Core WG that they accept our resolution
Guus: there's a practical question as the Primer needs small updates too
Ed and Antoine: ok for 18 august
ACTION: Ed and Antoine to provide before 17 august a pointer to the latest version [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action02]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.html
Is a list of editorial changes to respond editorial comments from Daniel Barclay
<Ralph> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0001.html
There's consensus on the mail from Elliott Rusty Harold
scribe: to keep to the singular of "note"
ACTION: Antoine to send an answer to Elliott's mail [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action03]
There was another mail from Daniel Barclay
<Ralph> ISSUE-226
ACTION: Antoine to respond to Daniel Barclay's mail by the mail in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action04]
<Ralph> SKOS Use Cases and Requirements
<TomB> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Apr/0109.html
<TomB> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
<Ralph> 28 April SKOS UCR Editor's Draft
ACTION: 2009-05-19: SWD WG to identify final version of Use Cases. [DONE]
<scribe> -- DONE : http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
ACTION: Ralph to publish the UC document as a group note at the time of recommendation [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action05]
Tom: should we publish the implementation report?
Guus: it's not part of our delivrables
Sean: shall I remove the request for comments?
Guus: yes
ACTION: Sean to update the implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action06]
<Ralph> specifically, the updates are to put a date of publication
Tom: what happened with the re-map from the mapping spec?
<Ralph> redirections
Tom: it is currently done
ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for legacy specs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11] [DONE]
Guus: proposal: final proposal on august 25
... mainly to discuss SKOS community aspects
<TomB> +1 to meet on 25 August
Guus: so this should be our last telecon
ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] [CONTINUES]
if no progress till next time, it will be dropped
<TomB> http://www.w3.org/2009/07/07-swd-minutes.html#item03
ACTION: Ralph to publish http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/ as a WG Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUES]
Guus: meeting adjourned