See also: IRC log
[section 2 may be verbose, should look if it can be shortened]
[look at possibility of combining sections 2.1 and 2.2]
[break down section 3.1 into further sub-sections]
[consider removing section 5, it does not seem to add any additional information]
[several typographical errors, please check it carefully]
[remove overuse of <acronym> tags]
[use of acronyms: (1) do not markup acronyms when it is expanded right before the acronym. example: "Evaluation and Report Language (EARL)" and not "Evaluation and Report Language (<acronym title="...">EARL</acronym>)"
(2) do not markup acronyms if it has been already marked up or explanded in the same sub-section
(3) do markup acronyms at the beginning of each sub-section, if they are not expanded
(4) consider expanding each acronym (rather than markup variant) in the first occurence of each major section
[all <DL> elements have an indentation, please remove and only add indentation where appropriate]
[please prioritize expanding section 4 at this stage]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009May/0027
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi to confirm scope of foaf:Document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-90 - Confirm scope of foaf:Document [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi confirm DC namespaces and notify ERT WG [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-91 - Confirm DC namespaces and notify ERT WG [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi confirm pros/cons of using OWL in addition to RDFS [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-92 - Confirm pros/cons of using OWL in addition to RDFS [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: CarlosI check with colleagues about syntax examples for OWL additions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - CarlosI
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia check with colleagues about syntax examples for OWL additions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-93 - Check with colleagues about syntax examples for OWL additions [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi to add RDF references to the HTML in EARL 1.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-94 - Add RDF references to the HTML in EARL 1.0 [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia to add RDF references to the HTML in Pointers [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-95 - Add RDF references to the HTML in Pointers [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-06-03].
<scribe> ACTION: johannes to add RDF references to the HTML in Content and HTTP-in-RDF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-96 - Add RDF references to the HTML in Content and HTTP-in-RDF [on Johannes Koch - due 2009-06-03].
SAZ: for duality issue, we need to say that comparison is on the type
MS: then an assertion with earl:failed and
myNS:nearlyPassed (which is also an instance of earl:Fail) would be
equivalent
... not sure that we want that
SAZ: thought we did, it is a use-case to provide the possibility of granuality but comparison mechanisms on Pass/Fail/NA etc level
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi extract discussion on comparion of OutcomeValue and bring it to the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-er-minutes.html#action09]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-97 - Extract discussion on comparion of OutcomeValue and bring it to the list [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-03].
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009May/0029.html
MS: need to add reference and change the status
paragraph
... may tweak D02 to clarify that it applies to entire EARL rather than to the
requiremtns
SAZ: also fix the acronyms
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009May/0022
<squillace> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Pointers/WD-Pointers-20090518.html
[no comments so far, looks good]
SAZ: please review JK's comments and questions, and prepare for discussing next week
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline
next meeting: 3 June