See also: IRC log, previous 2008-07-24
ACTION: Ben to contact Ed and Diego about new editors drafts coming down the pipe. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action01]
Ben: Guus pointed out what kind of review is needed, don't expect much trouble
ACTION: Ben to log all CR issues to tracker [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Ben to tease out the more involved aspects of ISSUE-122 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action19] [DONE]
ACTION: Ben to update Primer according to resolution, and add note about "it was designed to eventually work in HTML, etc..." [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action20] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Jeremy to add TQ's contribution for impl report to wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] [DONE]
-> "Wlki action" [Jeremy 2008-07-29]
ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Manu to start a wiki page for HTML4/5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action21] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action05] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Ben to talk to Alan about CR ISSUE-122 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action15] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Manu: Start Best Practices Section on the rdfa.info wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html#action16] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [CONTINUES]
-> RDFa-for-microformats-users
ACTION: Michael to rewrite and extend http://rdfa.info/wiki/Tutorials for RSS (maybe with seq) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [CONTINUES]
Michael: partly done, not yet put into the Wiki
ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Shane respond to commentor for ISSUE-121 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [DONE]
(by Mark ;)
ACTION: Shane to write home page for SPREAD. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [CONTINUES]
Michael: The main sorry is that the
implementation report depends on the test cases.
... we shouldn't extend the test cases.
... so if we're going to do it, we should do it very quickly.
Manu: That could throw a wrench in the works.
Michael: Yes, it could.
... I'm not against new test cases, but we might have to wait for a test case
to be reviewed.
ShaneM: It would also require everybody to to rerun their implementations.
Ralph: We should work out a mechanism to say what is for this version of RDFa.
Michael: Which set of test cases should I use?
PROPOSE: Freeze the test cases as of today for the implementation report.
<Ralph> +1
<msporny> +1
<mhausenblas> +1
RESOLUTION: Freeze the test cases as of today for the implementation report.
Michael: That's everything I need for the implementation report, should have it done by tomorrow.
Manu: Anything else you need?
Michael: Just editorial changes.
Manu: Javascript implementations as well?
Michael: Yes.
... There's other stuff like Shark and Top Quadrant, but they're not at the
core of what we need to prove for PR.
... We already have all the info we need in the Implementation Report.
ACTION: Michael to complete implementation report and send out notification to all working groups. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action20]
-> "RDFa test suite addition" [Manu 2008-07-28]
Manu: As Mark pointed out, pretty clear
Mark: When everybody is happy, wording is fine ...
Manu: After RDFa IR is done the according TC will be added
-> "Re: RDFa test suite addition" [Manu 2008-07-31]
<msporny> PROPOSE: Add text to RDFa Syntax document, section 5.4.2, making it clear that CURIE and URI relative URI resolution use the same method.
<msporny> > > Section 5.4.2, "Converting a CURIE to a URI" describes the following algorithm:
<msporny> We will probably want to clarify this section with something to this effect:
<msporny> "... relative URIs will need to be resolved relative to the base URI,
<msporny> using the algorithm defined in section 5 of RFC 3986 [URI], Reference
<msporny> Resolution."
ACTION: Mark to update RDFa Syntax document, section 5.4.2 to be explicit about which algorithm is used to resolve relative URIs. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action21]
ACTION: Manu to create test cases for testing relative URI resolution (href/CURIEs/etc). [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action22]
<msporny> uri-vs-resource-ambiguity-problem
-> "RE: RDFa test suite addition" [Michael 2008-07-31]
Shane: How will we deal with the editorial changes?
Manu: Need to ensure to respond to Alans points
Shane: Mark, Ralph, have you read the comments?
ACTION: Ralph to work with Ben on proposing specific editorial changes to RDFa Syntax document based on ISSUE-122. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action23]
Manu: Overview on editorial changes?
Shane: There are two: ISSUE-121 and relative
URIs
... that's all since CR
Manu: May need to check if there are others
during the last calls
... Wrap-up ... Michael to complete RDFa IR, all to check Syntax Document
[adjourned]