See also: IRC log
Held over...
This was discussed briefly in the last call. There is a "base" element already.
Shane is afraid that adding xml:base will mean we need to issue a new XHTML 1.x.
Roland says we have two options: go through a rec process for M12N etc. or just do it in XHTML 2.
Carried forward.
Shane suggests that we need to take the existing schema implementation for xhtml m12n 1 and tweak it.
<scribe> ACTION: Shane to start implementing xml schema for xhtml 2.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/08-xhtml-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Roland to respond to UWA WG and say yes, we are producing a schema. We do not yet have a schedule. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/08-xhtml-minutes.html#action02]
<Roland_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jul/0037.html
<Roland_> a reply was sent: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jul/0039.html
Shane thinks that reply is accurate.
The question is: do we really want to get rid of profile? GRDDL really wants to use it. Was the original deprecation of it in XHTML 1 a good idea?
The profile attribute seeme to be used by the microformat community too
Example: http://microformats.org/wiki/xmdp-brainstorming
Shane thinks we should expand the collection of "rel" values to permit microformat relationship. We should ask people who care?
Carry this forward as a future agenda item "Use cases for a profile attribute" or some such.
Skipped for this week.
<Roland_> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Group/2007/xhtml-modularization-11-implementation
<Roland_> Prose vs implementation
Latest draft of M12N is at: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-modularization-20070404/
Who is the audience for this? What is hanging fire?
<Roland_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-wg/2007JanMar/0047
Shane says XHTML 1.1 needs updating and needs to use XML Schema, and XHTML Print could use a schema implementation too.
Other topic is "what takes precedence, prose or implementation?"
Shane thinks prose / abstract module definitions take precedence.
RDFa task force is public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Went over a bunch of things about our outstanding work. No resolutions.