ISSUE-190

relaxedpathvalidation

Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
wsc-xit
Raised by:
Ian Fette
Opened on:
2008-04-16
Description:
This blocks on ACTION-416

It seems bad to have different browsers doing different things for the same site, specifically regarding whether SSL errors are displayed or not. I think we need to be consistent in whether we tell people to use relaxed path validation for normal (non-AA) certs or not. I.e. we should specify whether by default, relaaxed path validation should be used, or whether it's just an option that we expect 0.0001% of users to enable.
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Meeting record: 2008-05-13 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
  2. Meeting record: 2008-05-07 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
  3. WSC WG f2f May 2008 Agenda (v 1.1) (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-09)
  4. Re: ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? (from stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie on 2008-05-07)
  5. ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-05-07)
  6. Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-05-06)
  7. Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-06)
  8. ISSUE-190 relaxedpathvalidation Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-02)
  9. WSC WG f2f May 2008 Agenda (v 1.0) (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-02)
  10. Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-04-29)
  11. Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-04-29)
  12. Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu on 2008-04-29)
  13. Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-04-29)
  14. Re: ISSUE-190 (relaxedpathvalidation): Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? [wsc-xit] (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-04-24)
  15. ISSUE-190 (relaxedpathvalidation): Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? [wsc-xit] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-04-16)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>, Chair, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 190.html,v 1.1 2010/10/11 09:35:11 dom Exp $