ISSUE-167
Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit
- Raised by:
- Johnathan Nightingale
- Opened on:
- 2008-01-07
- Description:
- Review comment: We are supplying normative language for no-interaction certs which, aiui, are still purely conceptual. That feels like defining new protocols to me, particularly since the definition cites a non-existent reference at the moment. If this is out there in the world and deployed, then I think our language is fine, but I don't think we want to be in the business of defining x509 extensions.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2008-01-07)
- Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-01-07)
- ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-01-07)
Related notes:
Duplicate of ISSUE-119
Mary Ellen Zurko, 7 Jan 2008, 19:00:35Display change log