ISSUE-118
Interaction glossary?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit
- Raised by:
- Hal Lockhart
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-10
- Description:
- There should be a uniform vocabulary for interactions that's used throughout the document, and abstracts from various devices and modalities.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-118 Interaction glossary? (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-03-28)
- Meeting record: 2007-12-12 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-12-19)
- Draft Minutes 12/12 (from maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu on 2007-12-12)
- RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-12 (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2007-12-12)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-12 (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2007-12-11)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-12 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-12-11)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-05 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-12-04)
- Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-10-10 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-10-25)
- Re: Minutes from Oct 10 WSC conference call (from janv@opera.com on 2007-10-11)
- Minutes from Oct 10 WSC conference call (from janv@opera.com on 2007-10-10)
- ISSUE-118: Interaction glossary? [Techniques] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-10)
Related notes:
Waiting on review comments from hal, Luis/Ericsson, Nokia, and accessibility folks, to get a better handle, and see if it would be part of, for example, the Conformance section.
Mary Ellen Zurko, 12 Dec 2007, 16:42:37Added to xit as open issue under Section 3: Conformance
Anil Saldhana, 21 Jan 2008, 21:23:45Display change log