ISSUE-108
Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit-past-062008
- Raised by:
- Thomas Roessler
- Opened on:
- 2007-09-18
- Description:
- In the current draft:
Editor's Draft $Date: 2010/10/11 09:35:04 $
safe browsing mode includes a requirement that Web user agents only be able to access EV (or EV-like) sites when in Safe Browsing Mode. From discussions, this is one possible approach; the aim seems to be to have some whitelist of truted sites that can be accessed in this mode.
Questions:
- Should such a whitelist exist at all?
- If it exists, are EV certificates the right criterion?
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-338 on Phillip Hallam-Baker to Prepare discussion topics for Safe Browsing Mode; see ISSUE-108 - due 2007-12-05, closed- Related emails:
- Draft Minutes for 2009-01-21 (from maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu on 2009-01-22)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-05 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-12-04)
- WSC Open Action Items (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-11-26)
- Meeting record: WSC WG f2f 2007-11-06 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-11-21)
- Draft minutes: WSC WG 2007-11-06 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-11-17)
- WSC Open Action Items (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-11-16)
- WSC Open Action Items (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-11-09)
- Meeting record: WSC WG f2f 2007-10-03 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-10-25)
- Draft Minutes: WSC WG face-to-face 2007-10-03 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-10-10)
- Re: Draft Minutes: WSC WG face-to-face 2007-10-03 (from ifette@google.com on 2007-10-09)
- Re: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-09-24)
- RE: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2007-09-21)
- Re: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from ifette@google.com on 2007-09-21)
- RE: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2007-09-21)
- Re: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from ifette@google.com on 2007-09-20)
- RE: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com on 2007-09-20)
- Re: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2007-09-20)
- RE: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2007-09-20)
- Re: ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2007-09-19)
- ISSUE-108: Should Safe Browsing mode restrict users to a specific set of sites? [Techniques] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-09-18)
Related notes:
[tlr]: no safe browsing mode left
21 Jan 2009, 16:17:16Display change log