ISSUE-228
Checker Approval Criteria
What Criteria for Checker Approval?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- mobileOK checker
- Raised by:
- Daniel Appelquist
- Opened on:
- 2007-12-13
- Description:
What criteria does the group need to use to "approve" the work of the checker task force? Do we simply need to take a resolution or are there additional documents to be written?
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-609 on Dominique Hazaël-Massieux to Get the work on the mobileOK test suite started - due 2008-01-10, closed- Related emails:
- [minutes] BPWG F2F in Sophia, day 2 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-06-18)
- Re: mobileOK Basic test suite (from srowen@google.com on 2008-03-04)
- Re: mobileOK Basic test suite (from srowen@google.com on 2008-03-04)
- mobileOK Basic test suite (from dom@w3.org on 2008-03-04)
- mobileOK Basic test suite (from dom@w3.org on 2008-03-04)
- ISSUE-228: check the checker by end of April (from srowen@google.com on 2008-02-14)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-12-17)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from dom@w3.org on 2007-12-17)
- [minutes] Thursday 13 December Teleconf (from fd@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-13)
- ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
Related notes:
2008-03-28 09:54:15: The criteria seems to be: everyone was invited to review the checker for a month, completed by the checker test suite (ACTION-609) [Dominique Hazaël-Massieux]
2008-06-17 15:53:23: RESOLUTION: BPWG acceptance criterion for Checker is that the TF asserts that the test suite is complete and that no false positives or false negatives are known
RESOLUTION: BPWG Delegates responsibility for Go/No Go decision to TF based on acceptance criterion being met and no show-stopper bugs [Dominique Hazaël-Massieux]
Changelog:
2007-12-13 15:43:05: Created issue 'What Criteria for Checker Approval?' nickname Checker Approval Criteria owned by Daniel Appelquist on product mobileOK checker, description 'What criteria does the group need to use to "approve" the work of the checker task force? Do we simply need to take a resolution or are there additional documents to be written?' non-public [Daniel Appelquist]
2008-06-17 15:53:23: Status changed to 'closed' [Dominique Hazaël-Massieux]