ISSUE-228
Checker Approval Criteria
What Criteria for Checker Approval?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- mobileOK checker
- Raised by:
- Daniel Appelquist
- Opened on:
- 2007-12-13
- Description:
What criteria does the group need to use to "approve" the work of the checker task force? Do we simply need to take a resolution or are there additional documents to be written?
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-609 on Dominique Hazaël-Massieux to Get the work on the mobileOK test suite started - due 2008-01-10, closed- Related emails:
- [minutes] BPWG F2F in Sophia, day 2 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-06-18)
- Re: mobileOK Basic test suite (from srowen@google.com on 2008-03-04)
- Re: mobileOK Basic test suite (from srowen@google.com on 2008-03-04)
- mobileOK Basic test suite (from dom@w3.org on 2008-03-04)
- mobileOK Basic test suite (from dom@w3.org on 2008-03-04)
- ISSUE-228: check the checker by end of April (from srowen@google.com on 2008-02-14)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-12-17)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from dom@w3.org on 2007-12-17)
- [minutes] Thursday 13 December Teleconf (from fd@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
- Re: ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-13)
- ISSUE-228 (Checker Approval Criteria): What Criteria for Checker Approval? [mobileOK checker] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
Related notes:
2008-03-28 09:54:15: The criteria seems to be: everyone was invited to review the checker for a month, completed by the checker test suite (ACTION-609) [Dominique Hazaël-Massieux]
2008-06-17 15:53:23: RESOLUTION: BPWG acceptance criterion for Checker is that the TF asserts that the test suite is complete and that no false positives or false negatives are known
RESOLUTION: BPWG Delegates responsibility for Go/No Go decision to TF based on acceptance criterion being met and no show-stopper bugs [Dominique Hazaël-Massieux]
Display change log
