W3C | TAG | Previous: 24 Feb teleconference | Next: 7 April 2003
teleconf
Agenda for 31 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference
Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change
after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (30min)
- Confirm Chair, Scribe.
- Accept 24 Feb telecon minutes?
- Accept this agenda?
- Next meeting: 7 April?
1.1 Meeting planning
- The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting shortly after the WWW
Conference. See thoughts
from SW on organizing a virtual meeting.
Action TBL 2003/03/17: Propose June dates (after 4 June). (Done)
- Completed Action IJ: Add Japan ftf meeting to calendar
- Upcoming discussions:
- The TAG expects to discuss its W3C track presentation on 7
April
- The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC on 14 and 21
April.
1.2 Mailing list management
- Completed action IJ: Announce creation of public-tag-announce to chairs
and tech plenary participants (and to AC).
2. Technical (60min)
2.1 Architecture document
See also: findings.
- 26 Mar 2003
Working Draft of Arch Doc:
- Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under 2.2.4
of 6 Feb 2003 draft
- Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and incorrect
application of REST to an actual web page design
- Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web services
to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste and put into DC
writing.
- Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes
language from internet media type registration, propose for arch doc,
include sentiment of TB's second sentence from CP10.
- Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions chapter of
arch doc related to message
passing, a dual of shared state.
2.2 Issues the TAG intends to discuss
2.3 Issues that have associated action items
- contentTypeOverride-24
- See email
from DC to Voice Browser WG.
- Action IJ 2003/03/24: Draft up some language; make connection to
error-handling issue. TAG position with rationale why to not override
server value of content type.
- xlinkScope-23
- siteData-36
- Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
- xmlFunctions-34
- Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to XML Core
work. See email
from TimBL capturing some of the issues.
- binaryXML-30
- Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on adding
to survey.
- Next steps to finding? See summary
from Chris.
- contentPresentation-26
- Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. Deadline 3
March.
- rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
- Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum (RQ-23).
- uriMediaType-9
- Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
- HTTPSubstrate-16
- Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended to be
excluded from RFC 3205
- See message
from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
- errorHandling-20
- Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error has been
signaled. Deadline first week of March.
- metadataInURI-31
- Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
- fragmentInXML-28
: Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
- Connection to content negotiation?
- Connection to opacity of URIs?
- No actions associated / no owner.
3. Other actions
- Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that actions/pending
are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with PLH on this. Revisit this
end of April.
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/31 20:17:48 $