WSDL 2.0 Candidate Recommendation Issues List
Individual view
This list received comments from 0 groups and 60 individuals.
Comments from individuals
- Amelia A Lewis (alewis@tibco.com)
[2 issues ]
- CR124 :
editorial: features and properties in "xml representation" sections [open]
- CR125 :
problem with pattern attribute definition? [open]
- Arthur Ryman (arthur.ryman@gmail.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR110 :
Semantics of {http cookies} Property. [open]
- Arthur Ryman (ryman@ca.ibm.com)
[22 issues ]
- CR018 :
RE: Review of WS-A WSDL Binding [open]
- CR022 :
Component Values Must Be Context Independent [open]
- CR024 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR025 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR026 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR027 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR028 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR029 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR030 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR031 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR032 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR033 :
Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) [open]
- CR034 :
Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [open]
- CR035 :
Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [open]
- CR036 :
Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [open]
- CR037 :
Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [open]
- CR040 :
Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 [open]
- CR041 :
Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 [open]
- CR042 :
Re: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute [open]
- CR043 :
Part 2, 5.6.3 XML Representation of subcodes is inconsistent [open]
- CR044 :
Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each other [open]
- CR126 :
Re: New interchange results [open]
- Ashok Malhotra (ashok.malhotra@oracle.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR129 :
RE: Comment on Fragment Identifiers [open]
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (derhoermi@gmx.net)
[1 issue ]
- CR003 :
wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288 [open]
- Chathura Herath (chathurah@gmail.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR074 :
Assetions covered by schema validation [open]
- Cindy McNally (cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR128 :
Interface Inheritance Clarification [open]
- Daniel Barclay (daniel@fgm.com)
[2 issues ]
- CR064 :
WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [open]
- CR065 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [open]
- Daniel Barclay (daniel@fgm.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR068 :
WSDL 2.0 part 2 comment - 2.3.x, 2.2.x wording problems [open]
- david.vanderfeesten@alcatel.be (david.vanderfeesten@alcatel.be)
[1 issue ]
- CR008 :
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 SOAP 1.1 Binding: example @ section 2.4 [open]
- Eran Chinthaka (chinthaka@wso2.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR091 :
WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [closed]
- Eric Foutz (eric_foutz@symantec.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR121 :
WSDL enhancement request [open]
- Eric van der Vlist (vdv@dyomedea.com)
[3 issues ]
- CR052 :
Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding [open]
- CR053 :
Allow absolute URI in {location} [open]
- CR054 :
URIPath feedback [open]
- georgi.georgiev.pv@hitachi.com (georgi.georgiev.pv@hitachi.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR142 :
Leftovers of trailing slashes in replacement parameters [open]
- Glen Daniels (gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR014 :
CR ISSUE: Bug in SOAP binding (Section 5.5.2 of Adjuncts) [open]
- Graham Turrell (gturrell@googlemail.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR062 :
Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames [open]
- Hugo Haas (hugo@w3.org)
[2 issues ]
- CR009 :
SOAP binding: empty SOAP Action [open]
- CR010 :
Typo in HTTP binding [open]
- Hugo Haas (hugo@w3.org)
[1 issue ]
- CR039 :
Mentions of "error" and "fatal error" in Part 2 [open]
- Jacek Kopecky (jacek.kopecky@deri.org)
[2 issues ]
- CR020 :
Bogus assertions in 3.1.3? [open]
- CR038 :
editorial: part 2, table b-1 incomplete? [open]
- Jacek Kopecky (jacek.kopecky@deri.org)
[1 issue ]
- CR147 :
RFC: operation safety as semantic annotation? [open]
- Jason T. Greene (jason.greene@jboss.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR082 :
Header blocks in wrpc:signature [open]
- Jeremy Hughes (hughesj@apache.org)
[4 issues ]
- CR061 :
service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames [closed]
- CR063 :
Prefix declarations in inlined schema [open]
- CR066 :
Endpoint component {name} property vs xml representation as a QName [open]
- CR153 :
The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? [open]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[12 issues ]
- CR002 :
Do <import> and <include> support extensibility elements? [open]
- CR007 :
Assertion required for property <constraint> [closed]
- CR056 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR057 :
HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName [open]
- CR058 :
Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [open]
- CR088 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [open]
- CR090 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [closed]
- CR130 :
Question on double curly braces with HTTP Location [open]
- CR131 :
Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location [open]
- CR137 :
Spelling mistake in Part 2 [open]
- CR140 :
Re: Spec Issue - associating local names in HTTP location with element declarations [open]
- CR141 :
Re: Spec Issue - unmatched single curly braces in HTTP Location [closed]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[3 issues ]
- CR055 :
Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [open]
- CR072 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR145 :
Clarify 'scope' of {element declarations} and {type definitions} re SparqlQuerySimplified-1G [open]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[12 issues ]
- CR002 :
Do <import> and <include> support extensibility elements? [open]
- CR007 :
Assertion required for property <constraint> [closed]
- CR056 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR057 :
HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName [open]
- CR058 :
Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [open]
- CR088 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [open]
- CR090 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [closed]
- CR130 :
Question on double curly braces with HTTP Location [open]
- CR131 :
Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location [open]
- CR137 :
Spelling mistake in Part 2 [open]
- CR140 :
Re: Spec Issue - associating local names in HTTP location with element declarations [open]
- CR141 :
Re: Spec Issue - unmatched single curly braces in HTTP Location [closed]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[3 issues ]
- CR055 :
Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [open]
- CR072 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR145 :
Clarify 'scope' of {element declarations} and {type definitions} re SparqlQuerySimplified-1G [open]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[12 issues ]
- CR002 :
Do <import> and <include> support extensibility elements? [open]
- CR007 :
Assertion required for property <constraint> [closed]
- CR056 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR057 :
HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName [open]
- CR058 :
Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [open]
- CR088 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [open]
- CR090 :
Ambiguity in Part regarding built-in XML Schema types [closed]
- CR130 :
Question on double curly braces with HTTP Location [open]
- CR131 :
Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location [open]
- CR137 :
Spelling mistake in Part 2 [open]
- CR140 :
Re: Spec Issue - associating local names in HTTP location with element declarations [open]
- CR141 :
Re: Spec Issue - unmatched single curly braces in HTTP Location [closed]
- John Kaputin (gmail) (jakaputin@gmail.com)
[3 issues ]
- CR055 :
Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [open]
- CR072 :
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [open]
- CR145 :
Clarify 'scope' of {element declarations} and {type definitions} re SparqlQuerySimplified-1G [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)
[5 issues ]
- CR013 :
Relax IRI style cardinality [open]
- CR067 :
{http cookies} REQUIRED? [closed]
- CR076 :
{rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified? [open]
- CR079 :
Fragment identifier syntax not XPointer Framework-compatible [open]
- CR080 :
Canonical component designators? [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)
[7 issues ]
- CR023 :
typeDefinitions property optional? [open]
- CR046 :
Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) [open]
- CR050 :
When does {safety} appear? [open]
- CR051 :
when does wsoap:code appear? [open]
- CR059 :
Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} appear? [open]
- CR060 :
Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http authentication scheme} match? [open]
- CR069 :
Deconstructing MEPs [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)
[5 issues ]
- CR013 :
Relax IRI style cardinality [open]
- CR067 :
{http cookies} REQUIRED? [closed]
- CR076 :
{rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified? [open]
- CR079 :
Fragment identifier syntax not XPointer Framework-compatible [open]
- CR080 :
Canonical component designators? [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)
[7 issues ]
- CR023 :
typeDefinitions property optional? [open]
- CR046 :
Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) [open]
- CR050 :
When does {safety} appear? [open]
- CR051 :
when does wsoap:code appear? [open]
- CR059 :
Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} appear? [open]
- CR060 :
Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http authentication scheme} match? [open]
- CR069 :
Deconstructing MEPs [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)
[5 issues ]
- CR013 :
Relax IRI style cardinality [open]
- CR067 :
{http cookies} REQUIRED? [closed]
- CR076 :
{rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified? [open]
- CR079 :
Fragment identifier syntax not XPointer Framework-compatible [open]
- CR080 :
Canonical component designators? [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jonathan@wso2.com)
[7 issues ]
- CR085 :
RE: F&P Primer work done. [closed]
- CR086 :
{http cookies} prohibited inconsistently [closed]
- CR087 :
Turning off http transfer coding [closed]
- CR132 :
RE: Proposal for CR108 [closed]
- CR133 :
{http location} ignored on SOAP request-response MEP? [open]
- CR136 :
What does this table row mean? [open]
- CR157 :
RE: LocationTemplate-1G test [closed]
- Jonathan Marsh (jonathan@wso2.com)
[4 issues ]
- CR134 :
Operation dispatch when there isn't a SOAP body. [closed]
- CR135 :
Operation dispatch when there isn't a SOAP body. [closed]
- CR144 :
RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) [open]
- CR146 :
Ignoring uncited and nillable [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jonathan@wso2.com)
[7 issues ]
- CR085 :
RE: F&P Primer work done. [closed]
- CR086 :
{http cookies} prohibited inconsistently [closed]
- CR087 :
Turning off http transfer coding [closed]
- CR132 :
RE: Proposal for CR108 [closed]
- CR133 :
{http location} ignored on SOAP request-response MEP? [open]
- CR136 :
What does this table row mean? [open]
- CR157 :
RE: LocationTemplate-1G test [closed]
- Jonathan Marsh (jonathan@wso2.com)
[4 issues ]
- CR134 :
Operation dispatch when there isn't a SOAP body. [closed]
- CR135 :
Operation dispatch when there isn't a SOAP body. [closed]
- CR144 :
RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) [open]
- CR146 :
Ignoring uncited and nillable [open]
- Jonathan Marsh (jonathan@wso2.com)
[7 issues ]
- CR085 :
RE: F&P Primer work done. [closed]
- CR086 :
{http cookies} prohibited inconsistently [closed]
- CR087 :
Turning off http transfer coding [closed]
- CR132 :
RE: Proposal for CR108 [closed]
- CR133 :
{http location} ignored on SOAP request-response MEP? [open]
- CR136 :
What does this table row mean? [open]
- CR157 :
RE: LocationTemplate-1G test [closed]
- Lawrence Mandel (lmandel@ca.ibm.com)
[21 issues ]
- CR001 :
Suggestion Summary appendix? [closed]
- CR005 :
Built in XML Schema types [open]
- CR019 :
Must XML schema elements by imported in WSDL 2.0? [open]
- CR070 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR071 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR073 :
Suggested editorial changes to adjuncts section 4.1.1 wrpc:signature [open]
- CR096 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR097 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR098 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR099 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR100 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR101 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR102 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR103 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR104 :
One more duplicate assertion [open]
- CR105 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR106 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR107 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR108 :
Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the same requirement? [open]
- CR115 :
Suggested editorial change for assertion Import-0072 [open]
- CR118 :
Suggested removal of 2 assertions [open]
- Lawrence Mandel (lmandel@ca.ibm.com)
[2 issues ]
- CR006 :
Correction for assertion BindingFault-0058 [open]
- CR075 :
Suggested editorial changes for IRI and Multipart styles [open]
- Lawrence Mandel (lmandel@ca.ibm.com)
[21 issues ]
- CR001 :
Suggestion Summary appendix? [closed]
- CR005 :
Built in XML Schema types [open]
- CR019 :
Must XML schema elements by imported in WSDL 2.0? [open]
- CR070 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR071 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR073 :
Suggested editorial changes to adjuncts section 4.1.1 wrpc:signature [open]
- CR096 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR097 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR098 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR099 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR100 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR101 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR102 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR103 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR104 :
One more duplicate assertion [open]
- CR105 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR106 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR107 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR108 :
Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the same requirement? [open]
- CR115 :
Suggested editorial change for assertion Import-0072 [open]
- CR118 :
Suggested removal of 2 assertions [open]
- Lawrence Mandel (lmandel@ca.ibm.com)
[2 issues ]
- CR006 :
Correction for assertion BindingFault-0058 [open]
- CR075 :
Suggested editorial changes for IRI and Multipart styles [open]
- Lawrence Mandel (lmandel@ca.ibm.com)
[21 issues ]
- CR001 :
Suggestion Summary appendix? [closed]
- CR005 :
Built in XML Schema types [open]
- CR019 :
Must XML schema elements by imported in WSDL 2.0? [open]
- CR070 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR071 :
Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [open]
- CR073 :
Suggested editorial changes to adjuncts section 4.1.1 wrpc:signature [open]
- CR096 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR097 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR098 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR099 :
Assertions that are not assertions [open]
- CR100 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR101 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR102 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR103 :
Duplicate assertions [open]
- CR104 :
One more duplicate assertion [open]
- CR105 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR106 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR107 :
More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [open]
- CR108 :
Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the same requirement? [open]
- CR115 :
Suggested editorial change for assertion Import-0072 [open]
- CR118 :
Suggested removal of 2 assertions [open]
- Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net)
[1 issue ]
- CR011 :
CR Comment on WSDL Version 2, part 2: Adjuncts [open]
- matthew.d.rawlings@jpmchase.com (matthew.d.rawlings@jpmchase.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR078 :
XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to identify an element [closed]
- Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)
[1 issue ]
- CR084 :
Re: New issue (editorial): Missing attribute/elements in syntax summary in part 2 5.1 [open]
- Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)
[2 issues ]
- CR116 :
6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location [open]
- CR143 :
Tranfer-Encoding vs Content-Encoding [open]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[18 issues ]
- CR004 :
<appInfo> for the WSDL [closed]
- CR015 :
value space of "extends" attribute Info Item [2.2.2.2 WSL 2.0 Core Language] [open]
- CR016 :
wrpc:signature for RPC style [closed]
- CR045 :
Inline schemas with no target namespace [open]
- CR047 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR048 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR049 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR089 :
Definition of Interface Message Reference [closed]
- CR092 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR093 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR094 :
Assertion SOAPBinding-2503001 [closed]
- CR095 :
Part 2 - {element declaration} property for SOAP Header Block component [closed]
- CR138 :
{element declaration} for Interface Fault component [closed]
- CR139 :
Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts [open]
- CR150 :
Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 [open]
- CR151 :
XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 [open]
- CR152 :
Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults [open]
- CR155 :
Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 [open]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[4 issues ]
- CR012 :
Semantics of wsdl:import [open]
- CR081 :
Synchronous v/s Asynchronous, a WSA question, and few suggestions [closed]
- CR083 :
Editorial >> WSDL 2.0 definitions v/s WSDL 2.0 descriptions [closed]
- CR154 :
InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 [closed]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[18 issues ]
- CR004 :
<appInfo> for the WSDL [closed]
- CR015 :
value space of "extends" attribute Info Item [2.2.2.2 WSL 2.0 Core Language] [open]
- CR016 :
wrpc:signature for RPC style [closed]
- CR045 :
Inline schemas with no target namespace [open]
- CR047 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR048 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR049 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR089 :
Definition of Interface Message Reference [closed]
- CR092 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR093 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR094 :
Assertion SOAPBinding-2503001 [closed]
- CR095 :
Part 2 - {element declaration} property for SOAP Header Block component [closed]
- CR138 :
{element declaration} for Interface Fault component [closed]
- CR139 :
Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts [open]
- CR150 :
Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 [open]
- CR151 :
XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 [open]
- CR152 :
Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults [open]
- CR155 :
Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 [open]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[4 issues ]
- CR012 :
Semantics of wsdl:import [open]
- CR081 :
Synchronous v/s Asynchronous, a WSA question, and few suggestions [closed]
- CR083 :
Editorial >> WSDL 2.0 definitions v/s WSDL 2.0 descriptions [closed]
- CR154 :
InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 [closed]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[18 issues ]
- CR004 :
<appInfo> for the WSDL [closed]
- CR015 :
value space of "extends" attribute Info Item [2.2.2.2 WSL 2.0 Core Language] [open]
- CR016 :
wrpc:signature for RPC style [closed]
- CR045 :
Inline schemas with no target namespace [open]
- CR047 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR048 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR049 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR089 :
Definition of Interface Message Reference [closed]
- CR092 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR093 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR094 :
Assertion SOAPBinding-2503001 [closed]
- CR095 :
Part 2 - {element declaration} property for SOAP Header Block component [closed]
- CR138 :
{element declaration} for Interface Fault component [closed]
- CR139 :
Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts [open]
- CR150 :
Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 [open]
- CR151 :
XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 [open]
- CR152 :
Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults [open]
- CR155 :
Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 [open]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[4 issues ]
- CR012 :
Semantics of wsdl:import [open]
- CR081 :
Synchronous v/s Asynchronous, a WSA question, and few suggestions [closed]
- CR083 :
Editorial >> WSDL 2.0 definitions v/s WSDL 2.0 descriptions [closed]
- CR154 :
InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 [closed]
- Ramkumar Menon (ramkumar.menon@gmail.com)
[18 issues ]
- CR004 :
<appInfo> for the WSDL [closed]
- CR015 :
value space of "extends" attribute Info Item [2.2.2.2 WSL 2.0 Core Language] [open]
- CR016 :
wrpc:signature for RPC style [closed]
- CR045 :
Inline schemas with no target namespace [open]
- CR047 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR048 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR049 :
"interface" attribute info item on service component [closed]
- CR089 :
Definition of Interface Message Reference [closed]
- CR092 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR093 :
Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [open]
- CR094 :
Assertion SOAPBinding-2503001 [closed]
- CR095 :
Part 2 - {element declaration} property for SOAP Header Block component [closed]
- CR138 :
{element declaration} for Interface Fault component [closed]
- CR139 :
Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts [open]
- CR150 :
Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 [open]
- CR151 :
XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 [open]
- CR152 :
Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults [open]
- CR155 :
Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 [open]
- Roberto Chinnici (Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM)
[1 issue ]
- CR149 :
Re: rpc:signature question. [open]
- Williams, Stuart (skw@hp.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR021 :
RE: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [open]
- Yalcinalp, Umit (umit.yalcinalp@sap.com)
[1 issue ]
- CR017 :
Action Item 2006-02-16 [open]
- Youenn Fablet (youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr)
[13 issues ]
- CR077 :
URI comparison [open]
- CR109 :
SOAP Fault code issue [open]
- CR111 :
Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding [open]
- CR112 :
HTTP Location property definition [open]
- CR113 :
SOAP Response query string issue [open]
- CR114 :
Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs [open]
- CR117 :
Re: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location [open]
- CR119 :
Missing attribute in section 6.2 [open]
- CR120 :
SOAP Response and IRI style [open]
- CR122 :
Clarification about ignoreUncited behaviour [open]
- CR123 :
HTTP Method selection [open]
- CR127 :
Message Dispatching Primer Section [open]
- CR156 :
Query parameter separator value [open]
- Youenn Fablet (youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr)
[1 issue ]
- CR148 :
Re: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) [open]
- Youenn Fablet (youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr)
[13 issues ]
- CR077 :
URI comparison [open]
- CR109 :
SOAP Fault code issue [open]
- CR111 :
Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding [open]
- CR112 :
HTTP Location property definition [open]
- CR113 :
SOAP Response query string issue [open]
- CR114 :
Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs [open]
- CR117 :
Re: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location [open]
- CR119 :
Missing attribute in section 6.2 [open]
- CR120 :
SOAP Response and IRI style [open]
- CR122 :
Clarification about ignoreUncited behaviour [open]
- CR123 :
HTTP Method selection [open]
- CR127 :
Message Dispatching Primer Section [open]
- CR156 :
Query parameter separator value [open]
Maintained by Web Services Description Working Group.Last update: $Date: 2007/03/14 00:12:34 $
This page was generated as part of the
Extensible Issue
Tracking System (ExIT)
Copyright ©
2003, 2004
W3C® (MIT, ERCIM,
Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document
use and software licensing
rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with
our public and
Member
privacy statements.