W3CWSDL 2.0 Last Call Issues List

Individual view

Other views: issues | types | states | concerning | open actions


This list received comments from 0 groups and 58 individuals.

Comments from individuals

  1. Addison Phillips[wM] (aphillips@webmethods.com) [7 issues ]
    1. LC74a : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (a) [open]
    2. LC74b : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (b) [open]
    3. LC74c : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (c) [open]
    4. LC74d : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (d) [open]
    5. LC74e : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (e) [closed]
    6. LC74f : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (f) [open]
    7. LC74g : I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (g) [open]
  2. Amelia A Lewis (alewis@tibco.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC74 : Idle question [open]
  3. Amelia A Lewis (alewis@tibco.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC128 : MEP template [open]
  4. Anne Thomas Manes (anne@manes.net) [1 issue ]
    1. LC73 : Raising an ugly issue again [closed]
  5. Arthur Ryman (ryman@ca.ibm.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC103 : {message label} property of Binding Message Reference Component Should be REQUIRED [open]
    2. LC125 : Inconsistent Component Names [open]
  6. Arthur Ryman (ryman@ca.ibm.com) [12 issues ]
    1. LC43 : Rename <definitions> to <description> [open]
    2. LC80 : Extension Components are not Described [open]
    3. LC81 : The Component Model is Underconstrained wrt the WSDL 2.0 Schema [open]
    4. LC82 : Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug [open]
    5. LC83 : The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting [closed]
    6. LC99 : Message Reference Component is Underspecified [open]
    7. LC100 : The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose [open]
    8. LC104 : Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties [open]
    9. LC105 : Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model [open]
    10. LC113 : Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation [open]
    11. LC116 : RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? [open]
    12. LC117 : Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction [open]
  7. Arthur Ryman (ryman@ca.ibm.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC103 : {message label} property of Binding Message Reference Component Should be REQUIRED [open]
    2. LC125 : Inconsistent Component Names [open]
  8. Arthur Ryman (ryman@ca.ibm.com) [12 issues ]
    1. LC43 : Rename <definitions> to <description> [open]
    2. LC80 : Extension Components are not Described [open]
    3. LC81 : The Component Model is Underconstrained wrt the WSDL 2.0 Schema [open]
    4. LC82 : Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug [open]
    5. LC83 : The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting [closed]
    6. LC99 : Message Reference Component is Underspecified [open]
    7. LC100 : The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose [open]
    8. LC104 : Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties [open]
    9. LC105 : Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model [open]
    10. LC113 : Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation [open]
    11. LC116 : RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? [open]
    12. LC117 : Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction [open]
  9. Asir Vedamuthu (asirv@webmethods.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC2 : Editorial: Issue 177 Implementation [closed]
    2. LC98 : {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding [open]
  10. Asir Vedamuthu (asirv@webmethods.com) [29 issues ]
    1. LC12 : "whttp:location" attribute is missing [closed]
    2. LC13 : HTTP Operation Component ? [closed]
    3. LC14 : Mapping ref attribute to {fault reference} - Type Mismatch [closed]
    4. LC15 : Editorial: {http location} feature [closed]
    5. LC16 : Interface = design of the application ?? [closed]
    6. LC17 : URI Serialization: Order may be Lost [open]
    7. LC18 : Relationship between Features and SOAP Modules ?? [open]
    8. LC19 : Fault Component Re-usable Across Interfaces [open]
    9. LC20 : Feature Composition Edge Cases [closed]
    10. LC21 : Multipart Style and {direction}=out [closed]
    11. LC22 : URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern [closed]
    12. LC23 : Elaborate: Cannot be Serialized as XML 1.0 [open]
    13. LC24 : "ad:mustUnderstand" - ?? [closed]
    14. LC25 : What is a feature-binding? [open]
    15. LC26 : wsdlLocation on the chopping block ? [open]
    16. LC27 : Property Composition Edge Cases [closed]
    17. LC28 : HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [closed]
    18. LC63 : Mixing Schema Languages [closed]
    19. LC64 : URI References for Schema Components [open]
    20. LC65 : Editorial: imported schema vs. namespace [open]
    21. LC66 : Editorial: schema vs. schema document [open]
    22. LC67 : Editorial: more .. schema vs. schema document [open]
    23. LC68 : Editorial: missing antecedent [open]
    24. LC88 : Editorial: Typo in Section 3.7.3 Part 2 - HTTP Fault [closed]
    25. LC92 : wsdl:include semantics is different from xs:include [open]
    26. LC96 : wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import [closed]
    27. LC97 : Editorial: Setting Default Values [open]
    28. LC108 : Part 3, SOAP Binding - Editorial Issues [open]
    29. LC127 : Editorial Comment: wsdl:include [open]
  11. Asir Vedamuthu (asirv@webmethods.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC2 : Editorial: Issue 177 Implementation [closed]
    2. LC98 : {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding [open]
  12. Asir Vedamuthu (asirv@webmethods.com) [29 issues ]
    1. LC12 : "whttp:location" attribute is missing [closed]
    2. LC13 : HTTP Operation Component ? [closed]
    3. LC14 : Mapping ref attribute to {fault reference} - Type Mismatch [closed]
    4. LC15 : Editorial: {http location} feature [closed]
    5. LC16 : Interface = design of the application ?? [closed]
    6. LC17 : URI Serialization: Order may be Lost [open]
    7. LC18 : Relationship between Features and SOAP Modules ?? [open]
    8. LC19 : Fault Component Re-usable Across Interfaces [open]
    9. LC20 : Feature Composition Edge Cases [closed]
    10. LC21 : Multipart Style and {direction}=out [closed]
    11. LC22 : URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern [closed]
    12. LC23 : Elaborate: Cannot be Serialized as XML 1.0 [open]
    13. LC24 : "ad:mustUnderstand" - ?? [closed]
    14. LC25 : What is a feature-binding? [open]
    15. LC26 : wsdlLocation on the chopping block ? [open]
    16. LC27 : Property Composition Edge Cases [closed]
    17. LC28 : HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [closed]
    18. LC63 : Mixing Schema Languages [closed]
    19. LC64 : URI References for Schema Components [open]
    20. LC65 : Editorial: imported schema vs. namespace [open]
    21. LC66 : Editorial: schema vs. schema document [open]
    22. LC67 : Editorial: more .. schema vs. schema document [open]
    23. LC68 : Editorial: missing antecedent [open]
    24. LC88 : Editorial: Typo in Section 3.7.3 Part 2 - HTTP Fault [closed]
    25. LC92 : wsdl:include semantics is different from xs:include [open]
    26. LC96 : wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import [closed]
    27. LC97 : Editorial: Setting Default Values [open]
    28. LC108 : Part 3, SOAP Binding - Editorial Issues [open]
    29. LC127 : Editorial Comment: wsdl:include [open]
  13. Beyer,Nathan (NBEYER@CERNER.COM) [1 issue ]
    1. LC132 : WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies [open]
  14. Bijan Parsia (bparsia@isr.umd.edu) [2 issues ]
    1. LC3 : {namespace name} property [open]
    2. LC4 : Table of components/properties [open]
  15. Biron,Paul V (Paul.V.Biron@kp.org) [1 issue ]
    1. LC90 : XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0 [open]
  16. Bob Cunnings(cunnings@lectrosonics.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC55 : binding/operation/infault|outfault? [closed]
  17. Craig Salter (csalter@ca.ibm.com) [6 issues ]
    1. LC61a : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (a) [open]
    2. LC61b : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (b) [open]
    3. LC61c : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (c) [open]
    4. LC61d : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (d) [open]
    5. LC61e : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (e) [open]
    6. LC61f : comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (f) [closed]
  18. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [15 issues ]
    1. LC40 : typo [closed]
    2. LC49 : Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [closed]
    3. LC50 : Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [closed]
    4. LC84a : Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous [closed]
    5. LC84b : Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong granularity [closed]
    6. LC84c : Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far enough [closed]
    7. LC93 : Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" [closed]
    8. LC94 : Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes [closed]
    9. LC95 : Editorial: Typos [closed]
    10. LC115 : Re: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) [closed]
    11. LC119 : Misc Part1 editorial issues [closed]
    12. LC120 : Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import [closed]
    13. LC121 : Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" [closed]
    14. LC122 : Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" [closed]
    15. LC123 : Another part 1 typo [closed]
  19. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [3 issues ]
    1. LC8 : Permit URI References instead of URIs [closed]
    2. LC72 : Faults that are not described in WSDL? [closed]
    3. LC114 : In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [open]
  20. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [15 issues ]
    1. LC40 : typo [closed]
    2. LC49 : Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [closed]
    3. LC50 : Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [closed]
    4. LC84a : Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous [closed]
    5. LC84b : Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong granularity [closed]
    6. LC84c : Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far enough [closed]
    7. LC93 : Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" [closed]
    8. LC94 : Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes [closed]
    9. LC95 : Editorial: Typos [closed]
    10. LC115 : Re: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) [closed]
    11. LC119 : Misc Part1 editorial issues [closed]
    12. LC120 : Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import [closed]
    13. LC121 : Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" [closed]
    14. LC122 : Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" [closed]
    15. LC123 : Another part 1 typo [closed]
  21. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [3 issues ]
    1. LC8 : Permit URI References instead of URIs [closed]
    2. LC72 : Faults that are not described in WSDL? [closed]
    3. LC114 : In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [open]
  22. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [15 issues ]
    1. LC40 : typo [closed]
    2. LC49 : Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [closed]
    3. LC50 : Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [closed]
    4. LC84a : Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous [closed]
    5. LC84b : Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong granularity [closed]
    6. LC84c : Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far enough [closed]
    7. LC93 : Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" [closed]
    8. LC94 : Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes [closed]
    9. LC95 : Editorial: Typos [closed]
    10. LC115 : Re: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) [closed]
    11. LC119 : Misc Part1 editorial issues [closed]
    12. LC120 : Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import [closed]
    13. LC121 : Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" [closed]
    14. LC122 : Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" [closed]
    15. LC123 : Another part 1 typo [closed]
  23. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [3 issues ]
    1. LC8 : Permit URI References instead of URIs [closed]
    2. LC72 : Faults that are not described in WSDL? [closed]
    3. LC114 : In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [open]
  24. David Booth (dbooth@w3.org) [15 issues ]
    1. LC40 : typo [closed]
    2. LC49 : Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [closed]
    3. LC50 : Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [closed]
    4. LC84a : Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous [closed]
    5. LC84b : Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong granularity [closed]
    6. LC84c : Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far enough [closed]
    7. LC93 : Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" [closed]
    8. LC94 : Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes [closed]
    9. LC95 : Editorial: Typos [closed]
    10. LC115 : Re: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) [closed]
    11. LC119 : Misc Part1 editorial issues [closed]
    12. LC120 : Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import [closed]
    13. LC121 : Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" [closed]
    14. LC122 : Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" [closed]
    15. LC123 : Another part 1 typo [closed]
  25. David Orchard (dorchard@bea.com) and Roberto Chinnici (roberto.chinnici@sun.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC54 : WSDL Last Call issue [open]
  26. Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org) [17 issues ]
    1. LC5a : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (a) [closed]
    2. LC5b : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (b) [open]
    3. LC5c : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (c) [open]
    4. LC5d : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (d) [open]
    5. LC5e : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (e) [open]
    6. LC5f : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (f) [closed]
    7. LC5g : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (g) [open]
    8. LC5h : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (h) [closed]
    9. LC5i : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (i) [open]
    10. LC5j : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (j) [open]
    11. LC5k : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (k) [open]
    12. LC5l : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (l) [open]
    13. LC6a : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (a) [closed]
    14. LC6b : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (b) [closed]
    15. LC6c : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (c) [closed]
    16. LC6d : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (d) [open]
    17. LC7 : QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Editorial comments [closed]
  27. Frank Ellermann (nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de) [1 issue ]
    1. LC10 : Two typos in Bindings [open]
  28. Glen Daniels (gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC1 : Property Requiredness [open]
  29. Hugo Haas (hugo@w3.org) [16 issues ]
    1. LC11 : Consistent naming of fooDefault/defaultFoo [closed]
    2. LC31 : WSDL conformance & XML Schema conformance [open]
    3. LC32 : Part 3 examples 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 errors [open]
    4. LC33 : Part 3 SOAP Binding: default HTTP method [open]
    5. LC34a : Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (a) [open]
    6. LC34b : Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (b) [open]
    7. LC34c : Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (c) [open]
    8. LC34d : Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (d) [open]
    9. LC35 : Part 1 editorial comments [open]
    10. LC36 : Part 3 organization: wsdls:* versus xs:* [open]
    11. LC37 : Part 3 3.6.4 Mapping Between HTTP Operation's XML Representation to Component Properties and default values [open]
    12. LC38 : Part 1: DTD as the schema language for WSDL [open]
    13. LC39 : Part 2 editorial comment [open]
    14. LC44 : Part 3 editorial comment: 3.8.1 not written in terms of component model [open]
    15. LC45 : Part 3 section 3.6.2: {http location} not necessarily a template [open]
    16. LC53 : Optional predefined features in Part 2 [closed]
  30. Hugo Haas (hugo@w3.org) [1 issue ]
    1. LC85 : HTTP binding's MEP use description [open]
  31. Jacek Kopecky (jacek.kopecky@deri.org) [5 issues ]
    1. LC51 : Editorial last call review comments [closed]
    2. LC52a : Last call review comments (a) [open]
    3. LC52b : Last call review comments (b) [open]
    4. LC52c : Last call review comments (c) [open]
    5. LC130 : binding fault defaulting? [open]
  32. Jean-Jacques Moreau (jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr) [1 issue ]
    1. LC112 : New LC issue: XML Schema required (appears twice) [open]
  33. Jeehong Min (jeehongm@parasoft.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC60 : Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? [closed]
  34. Jeffrey Schlimmer (jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com) [30 issues ]
    1. LC75a : Faults and Messages should be similar (same level, etc.) [closed]
    2. LC75b : Referencing faults by QName (editorial) [closed]
    3. LC75c : Remove {safety} property [open]
    4. LC75d : Require explicit type for each input/output? [closed]
    5. LC75e : Move RPC style to Part 2 [closed]
    6. LC75f : Allow extension attributes on RPC local element children [open]
    7. LC75g : RPC should allow element wildcards [closed]
    8. LC75h : Disallow multiple returns in RPC [closed]
    9. LC75i : Disallow only <infault>, <outfault> [closed]
    10. LC75j : {safety} has a default, @safety doesn't [open]
    11. LC75k : Allow multiple children in soap:body [closed]
    12. LC75l : Make messageLabel mismatch an error [closed]
    13. LC75m : Inconsistent value for {operation reference} [closed]
    14. LC75n : Allow multiple interfaces per service [closed]
    15. LC75o : Remove "if any" from Table 2-13 [closed]
    16. LC75p : Make address a binding-specific extension [closed]
    17. LC75q : Disallow XML 1.1 [closed]
    18. LC75r : Remove conformance requirement on XML Schema [closed]
    19. LC75s : Add table showing which schema components are visible to WSDL [closed]
    20. LC75t : Make wsdl:include transitive [closed]
    21. LC75u : Add wsdl:documentation to the component model [closed]
    22. LC75v : Remove "Processor Conformance" [open]
    23. LC75w : Allow non-dereferencable includes [closed]
    24. LC75x : Complete or remove App D [open]
    25. LC76a : MEPs should support addressing mechanism [open]
    26. LC76b : Define "propagate" [closed]
    27. LC76c : WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Part 2) (c) [open]
    28. LC76d : Replace ADD with header construct [closed]
    29. LC77a : Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [closed]
    30. LC77b : Drop HTTP binding [closed]
  35. John Kaputin (KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC107 : Consistency of WSDL Component property names [open]
  36. Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC78 : Editorial comments on WSDL 2.0 Part 1 [open]
  37. Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC87 : Component Designators - what's the unique identifier? [open]
    2. LC131 : Consistent use of pseudo-notation [closed]
  38. Liu, Kevin (kevin.liu@sap.com) [5 issues ]
    1. LC41 : Clarification for use of xs:include [closed]
    2. LC42 : error in part 2, section 3.1.4 [closed]
    3. LC56 : Clarification for binding fault [open]
    4. LC57 : typo in part 3 section 2.1 [open]
    5. LC58 : typo in part 3, section 2.7.2 [closed]
  39. Liu, Kevin (kevin.liu@sap.com) [3 issues ]
    1. LC62a : issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (a) [open]
    2. LC62b : issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (b) [open]
    3. LC101 : message level binding? [open]
  40. Marc Hadley (Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM) on behalf of XMLP WG [8 issues ]
    1. LC29a : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (a) [open]
    2. LC29b : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (b) [open]
    3. LC29c : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (c) [open]
    4. LC29d : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (d) [open]
    5. LC29e : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (e) [open]
    6. LC29f : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (f) [open]
    7. LC29g : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (g) [open]
    8. LC29h : Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (h) [open]
  41. Michael Mahan on behalf of XMLP WG [4 issues ]
    1. LC48a : XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (a) [closed]
    2. LC48b : XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (b) [closed]
    3. LC48c : XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (c) [closed]
    4. LC48d : XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (d) [closed]
  42. Paul Downey (BT) [1 issue ]
    1. LC124 : Support of evolution of messages described in Schema 1.0 [open]
  43. Rich Salz (rsalz@datapower.com) [13 issues ]
    1. LC89a : Clarify schema validity conformance requirement [closed]
    2. LC89b : Don't introduce new abstract datatypes [closed]
    3. LC89c : Drop XML 1.1 support [closed]
    4. LC89d : Disabling a feature on a specific operation [closed]
    5. LC89e : Properties are runtime and shouldn't be in WSDL [closed]
    6. LC89f : Strengthen conformance re: syntax [closed]
    7. LC89g : Bleed between XML representation, infoset, pseudo-schema, component model [closed]
    8. LC89h : Use XML Schema, not pseudo-schema [closed]
    9. LC89i : Need primer [closed]
    10. LC89j : Use namespaces to avoid local-name conflicts [closed]
    11. LC89k : Inheritance unnecessary [closed]
    12. LC89l : Drop component model [closed]
    13. LC89m : Clarify "directly include" [closed]
  44. Roberto Chinnici (roberto.chinnici@sun.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC46 : Issue: missing "type" attribute in schema for wsdl:binding [open]
    2. LC47 : Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [open]
  45. Roland Merrick (roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com) on behalf of the XForms WG. [2 issues ]
    1. LC69a : XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) [closed]
    2. LC69b : XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (b) [closed]
  46. Sanjiva Weerawarana (sanjiva@watson.ibm.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC30 : use of provider agent & requestor agent terms in the spec [open]
    2. LC71 : default interface/operation/@pattern [open]
  47. Steve Ross-Talbot (steve@enigmatec.net) on behalf of WS Chor WG [6 issues ]
    1. LC59a : Bindings for 4 remaining MEPs [open]
    2. LC59b : Support attachments [open]
    3. LC59c : Differences between WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 [open]
    4. LC59d : Clarify wsdlLocation [open]
    5. LC59e : Clarify serialization [open]
    6. LC59f : Support compositors [open]
  48. Tim Ewald (tewald@microsoft.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC9 : How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement (Part 1, section 2.2.1.1) relate to interface inheritance? [closed]
  49. Umit Yalcinalp [1 issue ]
    1. LC106 : Revisit LC21 resolution [open]
  50. Wes Moulder(wes@webmethods.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC70 : Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL [open]
  51. WSD WG [2 issues ]
    1. LC79 : Make sure in-only mep is supported in wsdl soap12 binding [open]
    2. LC86 : Pseudo-schema inconsistencies [open]
  52. Xan Gregg (xan.gregg@jmp.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC91 : XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0 [closed]
  53. Yalcinalp, Umit (umit.yalcinalp@sap.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC102 : What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [closed]
    2. LC126 : Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed [open]
  54. Yalcinalp, Umit (umit.yalcinalp@sap.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC118 : New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) [open]
    2. LC129 : The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item) [open]
  55. Yalcinalp, Umit (umit.yalcinalp@sap.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC102 : What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [closed]
    2. LC126 : Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed [open]
  56. Yalcinalp, Umit (umit.yalcinalp@sap.com) [2 issues ]
    1. LC118 : New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) [open]
    2. LC129 : The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item) [open]
  57. Yves Lafon (ylafon@w3.org) [2 issues ]
    1. LC110 : WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4 [open]
    2. LC111 : HTTP Error code for faults (part3, sec 3.7) [open]
  58. Zvi Bruckner (zvi.b@sapiens.com) [1 issue ]
    1. LC109 : Multiple input and output elements for an operation [open]

Maintained by Web Services Description Working Group.

Last update: $Date: 2005/09/22 18:52:25 $


This page was generated as part of the Extensible Issue Tracking System (ExIT)