W3C | TAG | Previous: 3 Jun | Next: 17 Jun
Nearby: IRC log · teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive
Action IJ: Add to issue namespaceDocument-8 as background links to discussion by James Clark (see email from TB).
Refer to email from James Clark to IETF that kicked off discussion.
[DanC]
See also: findings.
RESOLVED: Accept "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Delete section 8.2. IJ may incorporate some of the related material up front.
Summary: The TAG then discussed a response from XMLP WG (TAG-only) about the use of GET in SOAP. The TAG resolved to:
Discussion:
[Ian]
DO: People commented about moving the GET binding earlier in primer.
Henrik's suggestion is fine with me. I would also might add, and I think this is correct, that (1) the appropriate representation might depend on the URI scheme being used...for example, whether the URI scheme is hierarchical (http) vs. non (UUID) (2) that in many cases the appropriate mappings will be application dependent and (3) there will be many opportunities to integrate this with a description language such as WSDL, and those opportunitites are not available to usin the SOAP spec. In short: we aren't against there being standard conventions applied in certain cases: we believe that the SOAP spec is not architecturally the right place to do it.
[Ian]