W3C | TAG | Previous: : 4 February 2010 Next: 25 February 2010

Agenda of 18 February 2010 TAG Teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details - issues list and Issue Tracker (handling new issues) - www-tag archive - tag archive

1. Convene
   • Chair: Noah Scribe: Dan Connolly (confirmed)
   • Roll call -- Regrets: Dan Appelquist, Tim Berners-Lee
   • Future regrets: none
   • Agenda Review - this agenda
   • Next Meeting: 25 February 2010 Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
   • Future scribes: Dan Appelquist -> Dan Connolly -> Jonathan Rees
2. Approve minutes of prior meeting(s)
   • Revised minutes 28 January 2010 were announced by Larry on 17 Feb; per ACTION-385 these will be marked as approved if no objections are received by 19 Feb (no discussion today)
   • 11 February 2010
3. Administrative items
   • The chair requests that TAG members start thinking about technical content of upcoming F2F meeting
   • The chair will soon be preparing a written TAG status report to Advisory Committee. This will be based on a review of our work since the last report — TAG members with input for the report are encouraged to provide it to the chair soon.
   • Tim should be back with us next weeks: if there are agenda items you've been holding for his return, please alert the chair in time for preparation of the agenda for 25 February.
4. ISSUE-41 & ACTION-388: Shorter document on version indicators
   • This relates to Larry Masinter's HTML WG ACTION - 172, which is associated with HTML WG ISSUE - 4: HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs and HTML WG ISSUE - 84: Should spec discourage use of "legacy" doctypes? (HTML WG chair has requested that the TAG and HTML WG coordinate scheduling of work on this)
   • ACTION-388: on Jonathan Rees - Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal - Due: 2010-02-11. Jonathan asks for clarification, and Larry responds.
   • See also: ACTION-369: on Larry - Write a shorter document on version indicators - due 2010-02-04 - CLOSED review. Larry notes under that action: "On January 2, I submitted a HTML working group "change proposal" for reintroducing DOCTYPE versioning with some additional rationale for why having such a version indicator would be useful: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html, and some subsequent discussion of that document. I think that is a "shorter document" on version indicators, specifically for the "HTML 5 review" product. So I claim "a shorter document on version indicators" has been written. It would be great if some other TAG member(s) would want to help with this change proposal. [Larry Masinter]"
5. ACTION-278: Draft changes to 2.7 of Metadata in URIs to cover the "Google Calendar" case
   • ACTION-278: on Jonathan - Draft changes to 2.7 of Metadata in URIs to cover the "Google Calendar" case - due 2009-12-27 - Pending review
   • Draft from Jonathan and messages in the thread following from that.
   • Discussion of ACTION-278 on 21 January 2010 (also: Tyler Close email regarding minutes of 21 January 2010 TAG call and responses in that thread.)
   • Email from Tyler Close asking for clarification of the TAG's position on his paper Mashing with permission. See also responses from Jonathan, Noah, and later discussion in those threads.
   • Thread starting with email from Jonathan with subject ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons
   • Proposal from Tyler Close
   • Proposal from Noah (see end of email)
6. ACTION-342: Tracking security issues in HTML 5
   • ACTION-342: on Noah - ask the TAG again about more formally tracking security issues in HTML5 - due 2010-02-15 - Pending review
   • This action was recorded in the minutes of Dec. 2009 TAG F2F
7. Pending Review Items:
   • Pending review actions in Tracker
8. Overdue Action Items:
   • Overdue actions in Tracker
9. Any other business