ACTION-369: Write a shorter document on version indicators
Write a shorter document on version indicators
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Larry Masinter
- Due on:
- February 4, 2010
- Created on:
- December 17, 2009
- Associated Issue:
- LanguageVersioning-41
- Related emails:
- Agenda for TAG teleconference of 11 Feb 2010 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-02-10)
- Re: Amended draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2010 (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2010-02-08)
- Amended draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2010 (from john@jkemp.net on 2010-02-05)
- Draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2009 (from john@jkemp.net on 2010-02-05)
- Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-02-02)
- Minutes of TAG telcon of 2009-12-17 (from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 2009-12-18)
Related notes:
On January 2, I submitted a HTML working group "change proposal" for reintroducing DOCTYPE versioning with some additional rationale for why having such a version indicator would be useful:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html
and some subsequent discussion of that document. I think that is a "shorter document" on version indicators, specifically for the "HTML 5 review" product.
So I claim "a shorter document on version indicators" has been written. It would be great if some other TAG member(s) would want to help with this change proposal.
Larry Masinter, 19 Jan 2010, 23:34:34
not on the 21 Jan agenda, so the soonest we'll get to it is 28 Jan
Dan Connolly, 20 Jan 2010, 18:54:57syncing tracker with 28 Jan agenda
Dan Connolly, 27 Jan 2010, 15:20:30[DanC]: for follow-up, see ACTION-388
4 Feb 2010, 20:26:14Display change log.