WCAG/Coga SC

This page is for the discussion and feedback on the new success criteria

It is recommended that reasons for the success criteria are also understood before suggesting substantial changes. This can be achieved by reviewing the gap analysis, issue papers and user research documents.

General comments

Add comments about the format of the document or other issues

Comments about a specific success criteria

Add comments about specific success criteria under the section bellow:

genral comments

• I've put up some specific language for the SC about "interactive controls" this extends color contrast (or borders) to icons and buttons. (david M)
• Need definitions of "sensitive information", and "visually clear" which I propose in the above link. (David M)

Proposed success criteria

Submitted to wcag

support personalization

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html

rapid and directfeedback

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rapid-and-direct-feedback.html

Feedback so far: should be in the modality of the user. should be more clear (john K has notes...)

• Regarding the SC on notifications. On the list we worked up a fairly well developed SC on programmatic notification. Perhaps there could be some synergies between these, and combined to be extended beyond only programmatic notification. It is here (David M)

NOT yet submitted to wcag

minimize errors

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/minimize-erdrors.html

accessible authentication

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/accessible-authentication.html

clear purpose

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/clear-purpose.html

timed events

See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/timed-events.html

change Guideline 3.1

(Make text content readable and understandable to Make content readable and understandable) See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/3-1.html