View source for Testing/Test Management TF/Review Process

== Review process ==

This is critical. Contributions that aren't quickly reviewed dis-incentivize test writers, give the impression of stalled projects, etc.

* Use GitHub review tools.
* Incentivize reviewers.
* organize it by establishing and documenting precise review criteria.
* Ask WG to provide for test reviewers per spec much like they provide editors.
* Have test reviewers mentioned on spec below editors.
* Work with reviewers to make their work easier.
* develop tools to automate initial feedback to contributor (lots of things can be checked programmatically: e.g. valid markup, presence of meta-tags, etc.)