SwigLogBit20091009

12:24:39
12:25:00
12:25:12
12:25:13
12:25:32
12:25:38
12:25:40
12:25:57
12:26:14
12:26:45	*
12:26:56
12:27:19
12:27:25
12:27:33
12:27:41
12:27:52
12:28:04
12:28:07
12:28:09
12:28:20
12:28:32
12:28:35
12:28:45
12:28:58
12:29:08
12:29:16
12:29:25
12:29:29
12:29:39	*
12:29:41
12:29:50
12:30:07
12:30:25
12:30:33
12:30:39
12:30:46
12:30:56
12:31:06
12:31:14
12:31:17
12:31:24
12:31:54
12:32:06
12:32:13
12:32:35
12:33:12
12:33:52
12:34:03
12:34:16
12:34:17
12:34:31
12:34:35
12:34:52
12:34:53
12:34:58
12:35:04
12:35:32
12:35:45
12:35:57
12:36:22
12:37:04
12:37:19
12:37:38
12:38:07
12:38:22
12:38:51
12:38:52
12:39:29
12:40:06
12:40:09
12:40:22
12:41:20
12:41:34
12:41:58
12:42:03
12:42:30
12:42:51
12:43:15
12:43:37
12:44:03
12:44:36
12:44:49
12:45:13
12:45:42
12:45:52
12:46:18
12:46:35
12:46:41
12:47:22
12:47:49
12:48:07
12:48:28
12:48:32
12:48:38
12:48:47
12:48:56
12:49:11
12:49:39
12:49:43
12:49:53
12:50:05
12:50:42	<MacTed>|
12:50:43
12:50:55
12:51:06	<MacTed>|
12:51:14
12:51:32	<MacTed>|
12:51:33
12:51:37
12:51:53
12:51:55
12:52:11
12:52:16
12:52:19
12:52:42
12:53:02
12:53:17	<MacTed>|
12:53:29
12:53:42
12:54:00
12:54:22
12:54:48
12:55:33
12:56:00
12:56:44
12:56:44
12:56:48
12:57:06
12:57:12
12:57:33
12:58:46	<MacTed>|
12:59:43	<MacTed>|
13:00:42
13:01:07
13:01:45	<MacTed>|
13:09:59		I think that LOD applications should not be categorized in such obsolete way... the categorization should be done in rdf! :)
13:11:07		That's absolutely true.
13:14:00		you can have one ontology for software generally and then other specific ontologies - each looking at the apps from different perspective