IMSC1.0.1 Wide review Comments tracker

The public review is now closed since 7 May 2017.

Call for Review sent to following W3C Groups

I18N ( 3 comments received)
Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group answer1 (Status: No response to Call for Review)
Web Media Text Tracks Community Group (Status: No response to Call for Review)
Web Platform Working Group answer1, Thierry's answer (Status: No response to Call for Review)
Web and TV Interest Group (Status: No response to Call for Review)
CSS Working Group (Status: No response to Call for Review)
Privacy Interest Group (Status: No response to Call for Review)
Web Security Interest Group (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TAG / Self-Review Questionnaire (Status: No comments)

TTWG liaison to EBU (Status: Answer to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to DVB TM-SUB (Status: Answer to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to TTA (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to SMPTE(Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to ITU-T Group 16 IPTV (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to ISO JTC1/SC 29 (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to IPTV Forum Japan (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to HbbTV (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to ETSI MCD (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to DLNA (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to DTG (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to DASH-IF (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to CTA (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to ATSC (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to ARIB (Status: No response to Call for Review)
TTWG liaison to 3GPP (Status: No response to Call for Review)

These messages are archived in member-tt

(each TTWG proposal needs commenter's approuval)

C1 - From: Shinya TAKEUCHI Chair, ARIB Data Coding Technology working group review, issues 228 - (Status: Done) ' Comment reviewed by WG and Sent to commenter / No response from commenter by deadline of June 30th.

We also received incoming liaisons in support of IMSC 1.0.1 as part of the Wide Review from the following external bodies:

C2 - From: Richard Ishida (i18n-comment) via GitHub | Clarification: Should the character sets be minimum *font* requirements? (#236) , issue 236 - (Status: Done) No answer from RI, the questions have been answered).
C3 - From: Richard Ishida (i18n-comment) via GitHub | Why exclude hebrew and arabic proportional reference fonts? (#237) , issue 237 - Closed by issue 245- (Status: Done)
C4 - From: Addison Phillips (i18n-comment) via GitHub | Recommended character sets considered harmful (#243) , issue 243 - (Status: Done) - (No answer from Addison).

(should only need approval from WG members, no formal approval should be needed)

C5 - From: Andreas Tai via GitHub | Requirement to support certain Code Point, issue 241 - Closed by issue 245 (Status: Done)

C6 - From: Stefan Pöschel via GitHub | Added explicit spaces in tts:aspectRatio and tts:activeArea definitions, issue 221 issue 230 - (Status: Done) no answer from commenter.

C8 - From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux via GitHub | tab characters from Example 7 , issue 232 issue 242 - (Status: Done)

C10 - From: Glenn Adams via GitHub Change itts:fillLineGap to ittp:fillLineGap. , issues 238 - (Status: Done) closed by commenter.

C11 - From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux via GitHub | Clarify "All regions shall not extend beyond the root container" , issues 240 - (Status: Done) Commenter agreed.