- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:34:32 +0200
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czq-5txWXrFCHbL=_xM1HsTjmRDALw11A=gO7iM=SkV_Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Changes: - added ISSUE-3 per Tadej's mail. - added a slot about the process how to get consensus on data categories. - removed ISSUE-12 (segmentation marker) since Arle agreed to close this - See your time at http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120628T14 We will try to go through actions and "low hanging fruit" issues fast with the goal to close or at least update these. Then we will discuss RDF + ITS and terminology related data categories (named entity and disambiguation) in detail. Note that not every action or issue is on the agenda - we just won't get to talk about everything and need to bring topics up again next week. ACTIONS See open actions at https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/open - ACTION-135 Pedro to have Giuseppe to flesh out specialRequirements. Pedro, can you give a timeline for this? If we don't get input by mid July, we will need to drop specialRequirements. - ACTION-126 David to come up with a proposal for mtConfidence. Please don't forget, this is needed to move mtConfidence to the list of data categories at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments , again by mid July. - ACTION-107 Shaun - can you give an update on the "LocaleFilter" proposal at http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20120626/#LocaleFilter Using the template attached at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html ? And taking this discussion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0148.html into account? This would close ACTION-107 and contribute to ISSUE-10 "language vs. locale". If you don't have time, who would volunteer? - ACTION-141: Table in a staging wiki page to notify current state of all data categories in terms of consensus and impl comitments. Maybe not needed in a separate place if we add the information to http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments ? This should be update by the co-chairs only. - ACTION-81 "consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent" - I closed this one, Dave, since I think we keep track of this via the provenance section you will provide by mid July - let me know if you disagree. - General reminder: we need to move quality discussion forward by mid July, otherwise the quality related data categories at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments are at risk to not be on the spec. See also ACTION-113 for this: Dave to conclude quality discussion with Arle, including examples from existing implementation in CMS-LION - General reminder: our plan until September, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html Let the co-chairs know if you have questions. DISCUSSIONS (SHORT, HOPEFULLY) - Propose to close ISSUE-3 What ontology should describe the metadata values (entity types)? https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/3 Latest mail from Tadej at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0157.html - Propose to close ISSUE-23 Re-draft section 7.6. "Removal, Archiving and Re-integration of ITS mark-up" see latest mail from Moritz at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0042.html - Propose to close ISSUE-1: Low level API to access CMS content, since this is implementation specific. - Propose to close "ISSUE-6: Process State" and re-open it after we have reached ITS last call. See also the discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0137.html Opinions? - Need a volunteer to work on ISSUE-9 id granularity and maintenance requirements and rules and idValue data category proposal, or drop the idValue data category proposal. - ISSUE-13 Cache data category needed and how? Needs two implementations, any volunteers in addition to Pedro? Otherwise we'll have to close this. - ISSUE-16 parameter for rules - can be closed as is without any change - opinions? - ISSUE-24: Proposal to change ITS term. Propose to close this, not moving forward and may be just a best practice for XLIFF+ITS. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0076.html question: is there a need for best practices about the relation between ITS and XLIFF? That's something we could do in 2013. PROCESS for deciding about data categories - Dave mentioned to me that there was confusion about this during the last call. I will give some clarifications today, please attend if you need more info. ACTION-141 is also related to that. DISCUSSIONS (DETAILED, HOPEFULLY) - RDF serialization related action: ACTION-122 Maxime to lead discussion on RDF serialization in ITS, with "task force" people - Sebastian, Maxime, Dave, ... Done via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0127.html https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Y8yLjJpWTJFA-WTvRhTDd6zl6jBOE9P5ckTfCZqUZIk - Terminology discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0136.html The separation between terminology, disambiguation and named entity is not really moving forward. Nevertheless we need this in ITS 2.0. Talk to you soon, Felix -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 07:34:58 UTC