- From: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:46:17 +0000
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <7a2337fb-c1c7-769c-fd4c-d5e615dd69ed@derilinx.com>
Hi all, Great work on gathering implementations! I have added two BP examples at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1l_imkvTjIRizyQl23HnBP2FFzO_cx4Uvm2i7q5KbpCM/edit Should we have a call on Friday to touch base? I can chair. Cheers, Deirdre On 07/11/2016 12:42, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks a lot for your contribution! I'm gonna include the new > evidences on our implementation and I'm gonna let you know when we > have a new version. > > It is great that you could provide some evidences for data enrichment > and APIs ;) Please, let me know if you have more suggestions! > > cheers, > Berna > > > 2016-11-04 10:55 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org > <mailto:phila@w3.org>>: > > Hi Berna, > > I've added a couple more reviews to the spreadsheet, from opposite > ends of the spectrum. One is an effort by one or two activists in > an off-shore island state (Guernsey) that is commendable in terms > of what it achieves given its origin; however, it doesn't score > well (not surprisingly). At the other end is datausa.io > <http://datausa.io> which is a highly professional aggregate and > visualisation site with serious funding. I reviewed this one in > particular as I thought it would be evidence for things that are > likely to be missing from simple portals, like enrichment. Another > one that comes to mind is http://opentrials.net/. I'll look at > that when I get time (unless someone beats me to it of course). > > The datausa.io <http://datausa.io> site is not really a place > where you'd go to get a dataset. It's an 'infomediary' site but it > does link back to the original sources, most of which are US > census datasets. So it scores badly on things like metadata (I > can't find any) but really well on the API stuff. > > HTH > > Phil. > > > On 29/10/2016 18:08, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > Thanks a lot for your contribution! > > I created and shared a spreadsheet with you on drive [1]. You > can use this > to collect all your evidences and later on i'm gonna include > them in the > implementation report. I already included the evidence from > CIARD Ring in > your spreadsheet. > > Please, let me know if that is ok with you. > > Cheers, > Berna > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wKfwLhT1DCyuDtf_oY6HwB3mzf_4P5LrxmasLWxIa-o/edit?usp=sharing > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wKfwLhT1DCyuDtf_oY6HwB3mzf_4P5LrxmasLWxIa-o/edit?usp=sharing> > > > > > 2016-10-28 12:45 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org > <mailto:phila@w3.org>>: > > Dear all, > > Following today's call, I wanted to have another go at > reviewing a dataset > for evidence gathering for the BPs. I looked at a dataset > on the CIARD Ring > site which is run by a group allied to the FAO. > Specifically, I looked at > > http://ring.ciard.net/chinese-crop-germplasm-information-system-cgris > <http://ring.ciard.net/chinese-crop-germplasm-information-system-cgris> > > My results are below > > I need to write to the folks who run the portal (I know > one of them at > least) and ask some questions related to some of the later > BPs but there's > some usable data here I hope. > > I also wanted to know how long this would take me as I > need to follow up > on my action-297 and write to folks to ask them to do the > same. This took > me about half an hour. I imagine if I knew the dataset > better I could have > done it more quickly, but then I know the BPs pretty well > s I don't need to > consider that content in detail. My guess is that it would > be hard for a > dataset owner/portal manager to do this is less than half > an hour (and it > could easily take an hour). > > CIARD Ring is a *very* good data portal (the best I know > of anywhere) with > tons of metadata but even on this portal there are gaps in > the metadata. > > I'll provide some more examples in the coming week. I > can't currently edit > the Google doc which is one reason for sending the info in > this mail. > > HTH > > Phil > > 1. Pass > 2. Pass > 3. Pass > 4. Partial. No machine readable licence, user has to > follow a link for > more info when you find actually it's all rights reserved. > 5. Pass - publisher with good level of human readable > info, although no > PROV data as such. > 6. Fail > 7. Partial > 8. Fail > 9. Pass > 10. Pass > 11. Fail > 12. Pass > 13. Data is behind firewall but seems very likely pass. > 14. Fail (only RDF is provided) > 15. Pass > 16. Pass - this is a reference dataset > 17. Partial - you could download with SELECT * > 18. Partial - you could download a subset with a query > 19. Pass (Web page has embedded RDFa) > 20. N/A > 21. Pass > 22. N/A > 23. Pass > 24. Pass > 25. Pass > 26. Pass > 27. N/A > 28. N/A > 29. Pass > 30. Fail > 31. N/A > 32. Fail > 33. Need to ask > 34. Need to ask > 35. Pass > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Archer > Data Strategist, W3C > http://www.w3.org/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297887%20767755> > @philarcher1 > > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------- Derilinx datAdore Launch your own data portal in seconds http://datadore.com/ ---------------------------------- Deirdre Lee, CEO Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions Web: www.derilinx.com Email: deirdre@derilinx.com Address: 11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891 Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ Twitter: @deirdrelee
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 14:46:55 UTC