- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:26:06 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
On 04/08/2013 04:22 PM, fantasai wrote: > There's a good handful of open issues on Selectors 4 that need WG > discussion to resolve. Tab and I just finished checking in the changes for these issues, as resolved in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0246.html We would like to request WD publication for next week. > ISSUE-223: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/223 > Should Selectors adopt MQ-style invalidation (per comma-separated group)? Closed issue no change. > ISSUE-316: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/316 > Should ID selectors accept all HASH tokens instead of #ident only? Added issue to spec until we resolve this: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#id-selectors > ISSUE-317: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/317 > Allow child-index pseudos to select unparented elements Updated prose and cleaned up indexed-selector section: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#anb > ISSUE-318: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/318 > Make specificity of :matches() / :not() depend on what was matched Done: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#specificity See also rationale wrt specificity of :not() http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0406.html > ISSUE-319: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/319 > Need usable selector for empty elements Added :blank for now: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#the-blank-pseudo > ISSUE-320: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/320 > Profile :matches() / :not() for fast vs. complete implementation Updated requirements per telecon request: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#profiles ~fantasai and TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 22:26:38 UTC