- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:49:11 +0200
- To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Tom, this is nothing pro or con the JSON issue, but I do not think this is a topic for the RDFWA Working Group. They are not chartered on the choice of a particular JSON serialization for RDF Ivan On Aug 23, 2011, at 16:41 , Thomas Steiner wrote: > I would like to add one item to the agenda: > >> 1. Jeni's Write-up / formalize issues >> http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/165 >> 2. ISSUE-103: preserve @vocab declarations >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/103 >> 3. Publication timeline for 3rd LC of RDFa Core 1.1 >> 4. Response to netlabs.org >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0033.html > 5. JSON Emergency Brake discussion (Tom) > > Thanks, > Tom > > -- > Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. > http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 14:46:39 UTC