ISSUE-103: Should RDFa Processors preserve @vocab declarations in the default graph?
preserve @vocab declarations
Should RDFa Processors preserve @vocab declarations in the default graph?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Ivan Herman
- Opened on:
- 2011-08-11
- Description:
- Should an RDFa processor add information about @vocab declarations to the default graph?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0018.html
The set of triples could look something like this:
<uriofrdfasource> a rdfa:source;
rdfa:vocab <uri1> ;
rdfa:vocab <uri2> .
with this extra info any subsequent post-processor could decide whether or not to do RDFS processing on each vocabulary. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-11)
- Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-11)
- Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-11)
- Telecon Agenda - September 1st 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-08-30)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC (from tomac@google.com on 2011-08-26)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-23)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC (from tomac@google.com on 2011-08-23)
- Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-08-23)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC (from benjamin.adrian@dfki.de on 2011-08-18)
- Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-08-17)
- ISSUE-103 (preserve @vocab declarations): Should RDFa Processors preserve @vocab declarations in the default graph? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-11)
Related notes:
Issue closed by accepting the requirements for extra triples: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-08-25#ISSUE__2d_103__3a__preserve___40_vocab_declarations
Note that an extra issue has been raised (http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/110) for the 'provenance' triple.
Display change log