- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:46:23 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.
Your e-mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/200309282315.h8SNFiEh006969@nerd-xing.mit.edu
Section 7.3 (Recognized media types)
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915/media.html#media-types>
What does "The names of media types are normative" mean? What
should a UA do when encountering an @media or @import rule that
lists an unknown media type?
CSS WG response:
Reworded the text: "names of media types are normative, but the
parenthetical descriptions are informative.
Also added: "Unknown media type identifiers should not result in
the @media rule being ignored."
For the CSS WG,
Bert
--
Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/ERCIM
bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 11:55:40 UTC