ISSUE-52: Respond to XHTML2 WG objections to language in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1
xhtml1
Respond to XHTML2 WG objections to language in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- HTML 5 spec
- Raised by:
- Michael[tm] Smith
- Opened on:
- 2008-06-13
- Description:
- Changes were recently made to the HTML5 editor's draft to address concerns about statements regarding XHTML1 in the draft. We need to make the XHTML2 WG aware of the changes and ask for a formal response.
Diff of changes: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.934&r2=1.935&f=h
HTML diff: http://people.w3.org/mike/diffs/html5/spec/Overview.1.935.html - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-62 on Michael[tm] Smith to get XHTML 2 WG response to edits around name of XML serialization - due 2009-01-18, closed- Related emails:
- minutes: HTML WG Weekly 26 Feb 2009 (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-26)
- minutes: HTML WG Weekly 26 Feb 2009 (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-26)
- {minutes} 2008-10-24 f2f meeting (day two) (from mike@w3.org on 2008-11-07)
- Re: changes in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1 (from roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com on 2008-06-19)
- changes in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1 (from mike@w3.org on 2008-06-13)
Related notes:
see also "Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Oct/0385.html 31 Oct 2007
reviewing OPEN vs RAISED... this one looks more like PENDINGREVIEW
Dan Connolly, 22 Aug 2008, 15:43:55[DanC_lap]: we
24 Oct 2008, 07:41:14I've completed this action. We are waiting for the XHTML2 WG to provide an "camera-ready" alternative for review (that is, what they'd judge to be an accurate and acceptable description of how HTML5 relates to XHTML1).
Michael[tm] Smith, 20 Jan 2009, 07:20:34Display change log
