ISSUE-6: Should our taxonomy include a distinction/modeling of data subjects to whom gdpr applies (eu citizens and/or locatedin eu)
Should our taxonomy include a distinction/modeling of data subjects to whom gdpr applies (eu citizens and/or locatedin eu)
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2018-12-04
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] 2019-10-15 dpvcg (from bert@w3.org on 2019-10-15)
- ISSUE-6: Should our taxonomy include a distinction/modeling of data subjects to whom gdpr applies (eu citizens and/or locatedin eu) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2018-12-04)
Related notes:
in the context of ISSUE-6 is “non-applicable citizens only” a “legal ground”?
Axel Polleres, 4 Dec 2018, 10:07:55related to ACTION-93
Axel Polleres, 5 Apr 2019, 13:21:00RESOLVED: We leave the further specification of specific subclasses of DataSubjects out of scope of the current CG, the spec provides just one example, dpv:Child that could serve as an illustration for other subclasses affecting certain groups of DataSubjects (e.g. Citizens of certain states to which a particular legislation applies, etc.) with this rationale we postpone ISSUE-6.
Axel Polleres, 15 Oct 2019, 14:47:37Display change log
