ISSUE-2: Do we need to formulate a notion of compliance in scope of the cg?

Do we need to formulate a notion of compliance in scope of the cg?

State:
OPEN
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2018-09-18
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. ACTION-97 (was: ACTION-89) (from axel.polleres@wu.ac.at on 2019-04-22)
  2. [minutes] 2018-09-18 dpvcg (from bert@w3.org on 2018-09-19)
  3. ISSUE-2: Do we need to formulate a notion of compliance in scope of the cg? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2018-09-18)

Related notes:

related to ISSUE-16

Axel Polleres, 5 Apr 2019, 13:16:27

not related to ISSUE-16 (i.e. ignore the previous note)

Axel Polleres, 5 Apr 2019, 13:18:03

Display change log ATOM feed


Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>, Chairs, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $