Input for Agenda Planning for the Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group

This is the view of actions grouped by issues ordered by due dates; see also the view of issues groups by products.

Action Items Pending Review

There are 16 pending review actions.

ID	State	Title	Person	Due Date	Associated with
ACTION-3	pending review	Circulate his research on types of apps requiring types of features	Matt Kelly	2012-07-02
ACTION-5	pending review	Add a conformance section to Level 1 that explains what it means to say "User agents MUST support Foo [FOO]"	Tobie Langel	2012-07-02
ACTION-6	pending review	Talk to the HTML WG about fixing/splitting AppCache	Robin Berjon	2012-07-02
ACTION-8	pending review	Come up with some text for ISSUE-20	Robin Berjon	2012-07-02
ACTION-23	pending review	Draft a proposal to drop online events from HTML5	Robert Shilston	2012-07-02
ACTION-28	pending review	Write documentation for testharness.js	Robin Berjon	2012-07-03	COREMOB-2012
ACTION-31	pending review	Look into something like jsFiddle for test writing	Robin Berjon	2012-07-03
ACTION-33	pending review	Document JSGameBench and the approach behind it	Matt Kelly	2012-07-03	COREMOB-2012
ACTION-34	pending review	Talk to OEMs/carriers about what they would most usefully need to get out of Ringmark results	Matt Kelly	2012-07-03	COREMOB-2012
ACTION-38	pending review	Make a fluffy picture out of the architecture described by Robin for the test system	Tobie Langel	2012-07-03
ACTION-39	pending review	Draft the architecture of the test system	Tobie Langel	2012-07-23
ACTION-40	pending review	Check on hosting in London (alt Paris)	Jet Villegas	2012-07-03
ACTION-41	pending review	Figure out teleconference logistics, timing, and critical mass	Jo Rabin	2012-07-03
ACTION-42	pending review	Clarify on the wiki that the active L1 spec document is on github, and describe when things should be discussed on the wiki and when Github issues are used to further the discussion.	Jo Rabin	2012-07-06
ACTION-50	pending review	Figure out how to do a call between now and F2F	Jo Rabin	2012-09-12
ACTION-59	pending review	Talk to Robin to get cross-origin messages baked into testharness.js/ test report.	Tobie Langel	2012-10-10

Overdue action items

There are 29 overdue actions.

ID	State	Title	Person	Due Date	Associated with
ACTION-12	open	Propose priorities for CSS Values parts, get agreement from CG, send to CSS WG	Robin Berjon	2012-07-02
ACTION-13	open	Propose priorities for CSS Image Values and Replaced Content parts, get agreement from CG, send to CSS WG	Robin Berjon	2012-07-02
ACTION-14	open	Send use cases about overflow scrolling to www-style	Tobie Langel	2012-10-02	ISSUE-11
ACTION-21	open	Jonston to do something useful	Wesley Johnston	2012-07-02
ACTION-22	open	Provide use cases for WebSockets	Wesley Johnston	2012-07-02
ACTION-25	open	Write something about conforming to HTTP/1.1	Jo Rabin	2012-07-03
ACTION-27	open	Expeditiously check whether it is practical to measure consistency of framerate	Robert Shilston	2012-07-03
ACTION-29	open	Survey people and compile a list of common errors in test writing	Josh Soref	2012-07-03
ACTION-30	open	Remove the dependency on Node to get Ringmark running, and help make it easier to set up	Matt Kelly	2012-07-03
ACTION-32	open	Provide requirements for an automated test runner of all tests	Jean-Francois Moy	2012-07-03
ACTION-35	open	Carry out a gap analysis of existing W3C test suites	Jo Rabin	2012-07-03
ACTION-36	open	Draft a test suite release strategy based on what fantasai and Josh_Soref described	Robin Berjon	2012-07-03
ACTION-37	open	Assess which existing test suites can be reused and at what level of coverage they stand	Robin Berjon	2012-07-03
ACTION-46	open	Summarise the summary and post on CG blof	Jo Rabin	2012-08-08
ACTION-47	open	Draft a chapter outline of "What is a Web App?"	Bryan Sullivan	2012-08-08
ACTION-49	open	Provoke discussion on list of ISSUE-33	Andrew Betts	2012-09-12
ACTION-51	open	Propose a feature in HTML5 that is both not widely deployed nor useful to a large share of applications	Bryan Sullivan	2012-10-09
ACTION-52	open	Write use cases that document the advantages of the Web in multi-screen/multi-devices scenario (e.g. that would justify CSS, SVG)	Tobie Langel	2012-10-09
ACTION-53	open	Amend 3.4 Device Adaptation to reference the section number applicable.	Tobie Langel	2012-10-09
ACTION-55	open	Write up the need for application configuration	Gavin Thomas	2012-10-09
ACTION-56	open	Start a draft of requirements of what our testing efforts should be	Gavin Thomas	2012-10-10
ACTION-57	open	Investigate tests that requie server side components	Tobie Langel	2012-10-10
ACTION-61	open	Find resources to implement what Dom writes in ACTION-60 within 1 month	Bryan Sullivan	2012-10-10
ACTION-62	open	Find resources to implement what Dom writes in ACTION-60 within 1 month	Robert Shilston	2012-10-10
ACTION-63	open	Find resources to implement what Dom writes in ACTION-60 within 1 month	Matt Kelly	2012-10-10
ACTION-64	open	Supply reasons to reference SVG 1.2 Tiny rather than SVG 1.1	Bryan Sullivan	2012-10-10
ACTION-65	open	Look at organising the next F2F late Jan in Aisa	Jo Rabin	2012-10-10
ACTION-66	open	Propose text summarizing the discussion on the list, i.e. what we propose as the "mobile web app" characteristics	Jennifer Leong	2012-10-23
ACTION-67	open	Write an explanation of what coremob is and what it is supposed to be doing	Jo Rabin	2012-11-11

Action items due next week

There are 0 upcoming actions.

Issues discussed over the last week

There are 0 recently discussed issues listed in the system.

Raised Issues

There are 27 raised issues listed in the system.

ID	State	Title	Raised on	Product	Open Actions
ISSUE-1	RAISED	AppCaches fix planned for HTML.next only	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-6	RAISED	Application Configuration file	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-7	RAISED	No spec to point to for View orientation	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-8	RAISED	No spec to point to for Full-screen mode.	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-9	RAISED	CSS Values is still a WD	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-10	RAISED	CSS Image Values is a CR	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-11	RAISED	No spec effort around momentum scrolling	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	1
ISSUE-13	RAISED	CSS Text is in WD	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-15	RAISED	Do we need both Shared and Web Workers?	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-17	RAISED	Resolution-friendly image format (for responsive images)	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-18	RAISED	Should "core features" actually be core at Level 1, or should we just consider features (in Level 1 Intro)	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-19	RAISED	Lack of a push notification system, important feature, but no sufficient specification at this time	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-20	RAISED	We need to have a way to express how conformance interacts with the availability of hardware	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-21	RAISED	Is 3D in scope under 3.2 Layout?	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-22	RAISED	Do we consider 3D in scope under 3.4 Animations?	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-23	RAISED	Is there an alternative to FileWriter? FileSaver? Something else?	2012-06-25	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-24	RAISED	Should we require Proximity Events?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-25	RAISED	Should Level 1 include Web Intents?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-26	RAISED	Should we include the Vibration API?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-27	RAISED	Should Level 1 include SSE?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-28	RAISED	Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-29	RAISED	What are the requirements for a test framework?	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-30	RAISED	Should the document track the testing effort or not	2012-06-26	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-31	RAISED	Is Network Information API in scope for Coremob Level 1	2012-07-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-32	RAISED	Follow work of WHATWG, Responsive Image CG and HTML WG and revisit Network Information when appropriate	2012-09-05		0
ISSUE-33	RAISED	We need to define our requirements for asset loading control (cf ACTION-15)	2012-09-05		0
ISSUE-34 Agenda F2F Sukkot 2012	RAISED	Agenda for Coremob F2F 2-3 October 2012 London	2012-09-05		0

Pending Review Issues

The following issues are candidate for closing.

There are 2 pending review issues listed in the system.

ID	State	Title	Raised on	Product	Open Actions
ISSUE-2	PENDING REVIEW	Latency requirements for playing an audio file	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0
ISSUE-14	PENDING REVIEW	XHR level 1 and 2 specs	2012-06-18	COREMOB-2012	0