ISSUE-18: Should "core features" actually be core at Level 1, or should we just consider features (in Level 1 Intro)

Should "core features" actually be core at Level 1, or should we just consider features (in Level 1 Intro)

State:
RAISED
Product:
COREMOB-2012
Raised by:
Opened on:
2012-06-25
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Draft Summary of Coremob F2F 28 and 29 June 2012 (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2012-07-28)
  2. Draft F2F minutes (from jsoref@rim.com on 2012-06-29)
  3. ISSUE-18: Should 'core features' actually be core at Level 1, or should we just consider features (in Level 1 Intro) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-25)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 18.html,v 1.1 2013/11/04 20:32:51 ted Exp $