See also: IRC log
<Andi> scribe:
<Andi> scribe: Andi
resolution: accept How to Meet Success Criterion 2.3.2, Understanding 1.3, 1.4, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 3.1, 4.2 with edits by consent decree
<scribe> scribe: David_MacDonald
resolution: accept SC 1.3.1 , adopt with edits except for the last item... except the end of Michael recommendation starting at "another related situation..."
<scribe> ACTION: Andi to add a line in the wording of the text of the Failure technique to ensure that the failure does not cover layout tables [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/30-wai-wcag-irc]
resolution: adopt sc 1.3.1 Failure due to using structural markup in a way that does not represent relationships in the content with Andi's edit to the language in the description to make sure it does not apply to layout tables
<Zakim> Yvette, you wanted to say "failure due to not including a description of a link"
resolution: do not adopt the failure 2.4.4 Failure: Failure due to not programmatically associating a link with text which its purpose can be determined. And adding a line in the example of the parent element example that says that preceeding parent element must contain the link or it is not a parent.
<Zakim> Yvette, you wanted to ask for clarification
resolution: accept how to meet sc 1.2.2
... accept John's definition of fully corrected screenplay with the old note about "a screenplay used to create removing "as it occurred and"
<Sorcha> IP caller is Sorcha Moore, Segala
resolution: accept how to meet 1.2.2 with John's intent edit
<Andi> scribe: Andi
resolution: accept "How to meet 2.3.2" with edits
resolution: accept reworded guideline 4.1 Support compatibility with current and future user agents
(including assistive technologies)
<ben> current definition: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/appendixA.html#programmaticallydetermineddef
<judy> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20030520.html
<judy> sorry, updated version: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/
<gregg> ACK
resolution: roll call vote to open up normative definitions of "programmatically set" and "programmatically determined"
<judy> +1 on being careful on terminology & intent
<gregg> set by software using methods that are user-agent-supported
proposal for definition of "programmatically set" - "set by software using methods that are user-agent-supported"
proposal for definition of "programmatically determined" - "determined by software from data provided in a user-agent-supported manner such that the user agents can extract and present this information to users in different modalities"
amend proposals on definition of "programmatically set" and "programmatically determined" - add and address issue of the availability of the APIs in the information on choosing a baseline.
resolution: accept proposal to remove "publicly documented" from definitions of "programmatically set" and "programmatically determined" and address issue of the availability of interfaces to the information on choosing a baseline.
resolution: accept "Understanding guideline 1.1" with edits
... accept all "Understanding guideline x.y" documents with edits
resolution: accept with edits
... accept