The Principles: 1, 2, 3, 4 | Contents | How this Document is Organized | Techniques | Glossary | WCAG 1.0 / 2.0 Mapping
The Guidelines: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 | 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 | 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 | 4.1, 4.2, 4.3

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
PLAIN LANGUAGE VERSION
(taken from View 4 - Combined)

W3C Working Draft 16 November 2003

This version:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/11/plain_lang.html
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
Editors:
Ben Caldwell, Trace R&D Center
Wendy Chisholm, W3C
Gregg Vanderheiden, Trace R&D Center
Jason White, University of Melbourne

NOTICE and LEGEND:

This document contains a series of proposals for a "plain language_ rewording of WCAG 2.0 with Success Criteria, Examples, and Benefits

This is submitted in partial fulfillment of an action item taken by John Slatin, Katie Haritos-Shea, and Doyle Burnett during a call in late September, to generate a PLAIN LANGUAGE VERSION of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0.

At this point, it is not really "plain language," in the sense that this text has not yet been compared to the 1500-word "special lexicon" used by Voice of America (or other similar lexicons). Thus it's actually best understood as an attempt to simplify and clarify. We're still working on the formal plain language issues, but wanted to put this out to start generating discussion.

Items labeled "Current wording" are taken from the September document Reorg 4, available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/09/reorg4.html. This document was current at the time Katie and Doyle and I took on the action item to attempt a plain language version. Of course the proposed rewordings will need to be correlated with later updates.

Last updated November 17, 2003 by: Katie Haritos-Shea

Abstract

W3C published the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG 1.0) as a Recommendation in May 1999. This Working Draft for version 2.0 builds on WCAG 1.0. It has the same aim: to explain how to make Web content accessible to people with disabilities and to define target levels of accessibility. By incorporating feedback received on WCAG 1.0, the Working Group decided that this Working Draft of version 2.0 should focus on checkpoints. WCAG 2.0 applies the checkpoints to a wider range of technologies and uses wording that is expected to be better understood by a broader audience.

Status of this Document

This document is an editors' copy that has no official standing.

This document is prepared by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) to show how more generalized (less HTML-specific) WCAG checkpoints mightread. This draft is not yet based on consensus of the WCAG Working Group nor has it gone through the W3C document process. This Working Draft in no way supersedes WCAG 1.0.

Please refer to "Issue Tracking for WCAG 2.0 Working Draft" for a list of open issues related to this Working Draft. The "History of Changes to WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts" is also available.

This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or made obsolete by newer documents . It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress". A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents is available.

The Working Group welcomes comments on this document at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org. The archives for this list are publicly available. Archives of the WCAG WG mailing list discussions are also publicly available.

Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the WCAG Working Group's patent disclosure page in conformance with W3C policy.

This document has been produced as part of the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). The goals of the WCAG WG are discussed in the Working Group charter. The WCAG WG is part of the WAI Technical Activity.

Introduction

WCAG 2.0...........

Who Benefits?........and How

(Who Else Benefits..........)

These are the folks that benefit.............from:

.....
....
....
......
......
......
......
......
......
Elderly
Inexperienced Users
......
......
......
......
......
......
......

How This Document Is Organized

The few terms defined in this Section were chosen specifically to help you in navigating this document, as well as to give a quick overall idea of some of the key points necessary to understand and implement these Principles.

The complete Glossary for WCAG 2.0 is located at the bottom of this document. Terms here were referenced from:

Informative, Non-Normative
What is identified as "informative" (sometimes, "non-normative") is never required for conformance.
Normative
What is identified as "normative" is required for conformance (noting that one may conform in a variety of well-defined ways to this document).
Principles
Guidelines
CORE Guidelines
EXTENDED Guidelines
Checkpoints
A term that is no longer used in this particular document, due to the new structure
Required Criteria
Best Practices
Additional Information
Who Benefits
Examples
Techniques - WCAG 2.0 Techniques Documents
Conformance
The ability of a product to meet all the requirements claimed to be supported. Part of a specification which defines the requirements that must be satisfied to claim conformance to part of the specification.
Conformance Claims - How Do I Make a Conformance Claim to WCAG 2.0?
Note
Exception
Example

Table of Contents

Appendices





PROPOSED


Principle 1: PERCEIVABLE.
Any User Should Be Able to Perceive All Content

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Guideline 1: PERCEIVABLE. Make Content Perceivable by Any User

CORE Guidelines for Principle 1

PROPOSED


Guideline 1.1 [C1]
For non-text content, provide text equivalents that serve the same purpose or convey the same information as the non-text content, except when the purpose of the non-text content is to create a specific sensory experience (for example, music, visual art) in which case a text label and description are sufficient

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.1 All non-text content that can be expressed in words has a text equivalent of the function or information that the non-text content was intended to convey.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.1

  1. Text equivalents are directly associated with non-text content, except when the non-text content is intended to create a specific sensory experience (for example, music without words, visual art)

    • The text equivalent fulfills the same function as the author intended for the non-text content (that is, it conveys all of the intended information and achieves the same function as the non-text content).

      The text equivalent fulfills the same function as the author intended for the non-text content (i.e. it presents all of the intended information and/or achieves the same function of the non-text content)

  2. Non-text content that is designed to create a specific sensory experience (such as music without words or visual art) has a text label and a text description.

    non-text content that can not be expressed in words has a descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent.

PROPOSED Success Criteria with LEVELS



NORMATIVE

SUCCESS CRITERIA for 1.1

Level 1

  1. 1.1 - SC 1 - Text equivalents are explicitly associated with non-text content, except when the non-text content is intended to create a specific sensory experience (for example, music without words, visual art).

    • The text equivalent fulfills the same function as the author intended for the non-text content (that is, it conveys all of the intended information and achieves the same function as the non-text content).

  2. 1.1 - SC2 - Non-text content that is designed to create a specific sensory experience (such as music without words or visual art) has a text label and a text description.

Level 2

(no items in level 2)

only item here was deleted for consistency with changes to 1.1 that eliminate the phrase "expressed in words"

Level 3

  1. 1.1 - SC3 - A single text document (e.g script) is provided that includes all important visual information, dialogue, and other important sounds).

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.1

  1. A collated transcript that merges transcripts of all audio descriptions and captions into a single text document that provides dialog, important sounds and important visual information is provided

    OR

    A single text document is provided that merges transcripts of all audio descriptions and captions into a collated transcript that includes all important visual information, all dialogue, and other important sounds

  1. non-text content that can not be expressed in words has a text equivalent for all aspects that can be expressed in words.

    a text document that merges all audio descriptions and captions into a collated script (that provides dialog, important sounds and important visual information in a single text document) is provided



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.1
  • People who are blind, have low vision, have cognitive disabilities or have trouble reading text for any reason can have the text read aloud to them by assistive technology.
  • People who are deaf, are hard-of-hearing or who are having trouble understanding audio information for any reason can read the text presentation or have it translated and presented as sign language by assistive technology.
  • People who are blind or deaf-blind can read the text in Braille
  • Individuals who are blind, have low vision, have cognitive disabilities or have trouble reading text for any reason can have the text read aloud to them.
  • Individuals who are deaf, are hard of hearing or who are having trouble understanding the audio information for any reason can read the text presentation or have it translated and presented as sign language by their assistive technology
  • Individuals who are blind or deaf-blind can have the information presented in braille


Who Else Benefits from 1.1 (text equivalents)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.1
  • Example 1: An image used as a button. (short equivalent to explain function)

    A right arrow icon is used to link to the next slide in a slide show. The text equivalent is "Next Slide", so that a screen reader would read the phrase "Next Slide" and automatically identify it as a link by adding the word link or changing the synthesizer's voice.

    A right arrow icon is used to link to the next slide in a slide show. The text equivalent is "Next Slide," so that what is read by a screen reader would be "link: Next Slide."

  • Example 2: A data chart. (short label + longer description)

    A bar chart compares how many widgets were sold in June, July, and August. The short label says, "Figure one - Sales in June, July and August." The longer description identifies the type of chart or graph, provides a high-level summary of the data comparable to that available from the chart or graph, and provides the data themselves (itself ?) in a table or other accessible format.

    A bar chart compares how many widgets were sold in June, July, and August. The short label says, "Figure one - Sales in June, July and August." The longer description identifies the type of chart or graph, provides a high-level summary of the data comparable to that available from the chart or graph, and lists the data themselves.

  • Example 3: An animation. (short label + longer description)

    An animation shows how to tie a knot. The short label says, "An animation showing how to tie a square knot." The longer explanation describes the hand movements needed to tie the knot.

  • Example 4: An audio file of a speech. (short label + transcript)

    An audio file is embedded in a Web page. The short label says, "Chairman's speech to the assembly." A link to a text transcript is provided immediately after the audio clip.

    An audio file is embedded in a Web page. The short label says, "Chairman's speech to the assembly." A link to a text transcript is provided immediately after the clip.

  • Example 5: An audio file of a symphony. (short label)

    An audio file is embedded in a Web page. The short label says, "Beethoven's 5th Symphony performed by the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra."

    EDITORS NOTE:
    No change. But as currently worded, this example is no longer consistent with the Guideline's requirement to provide a text label and description. (js 10/24) Query: The proposed wording for 1.1 would require a text label and description here. I agree that requiring a description is probably too much. Do we need to change the Principle to leave room for judgment about when a description would be required?



PROPOSED


Guideline 1.2 [C2]
Provide synchronized media equivalents for time-dependent presentations

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.2 Synchronized media equivalents are provided for time-dependent presentations.


EDITORS NOTE:
(06/10/03) There is discussion about moving some of the current success criteria from Required to Best Practice or to an Extended checkpoint. The issue stems from trying to apply the success criteria to every Web cam, newscast, and home broadcast. Another approach is to allow a conformance claim to state, for example, "All pages and applications on this site meet the Core checkpoints of WCAG 2.0 except the Web cam at http://example.org/webcam/."

NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.2

  1. An audio description is provided for on-screen events that are not identified in the soundtrack and are essential to understanding the presentation.

    an audio description is provided

  2. Captions are provided for all significant dialogue and sounds.

    Exception:
    A text transcript or other non-audio equivalent that is not synchronized with the multimedia presentation satisfies this success criterion if all four of the following statements about the content are true:

    1. The content is real-time and
    2. the content is audio-only and
    3. the content is not time-sensitive and
    4. the content is not interactive.

    All significant dialogue and sounds are captioned

    Exception:
    If the Web content is real-time and audio-only and not time-sensitive and not interactive a transcript or other non-audio equivalent is sufficient.

  3. Descriptions and captions are synchronized with the events they represent.

    Exception:
    A text transcript or other non-audio equivalent that is not synchronized with the multimedia presentation satisfies this success criterion if all four of the following statements about the content are true:

    1. The content is real-time and
    2. the content is audio-only and
    3. the content is not time-sensitive and
    4. the content is not interactive.

  4. If the Web content is real-time video with audio, then real-time captions are provided.

    Exception:
    If the content is a music program that is primarily non-vocal, then captions are not required

    If the Web content is real-time video with audio, real-time captions are provided unless the content:

    • is a music program that is primarily non-vocal

  5. If the Web content is real-time, non-interactive video
    (for example, a Webcam view of surrounding conditions such as weather information), then one of the following is provided:

    • an equivalent that conforms to Guideline 1.1 (for example, an ongoing text report of weather conditions)
    • a link to an equivalent that conforms to Guideline 1.1 (for example, a link to a weather Web site that conforms to Guideline 1.1)

    if the Web content is real-time non-interactive video (e.g., a Webcam of ambient conditions), either provide an equivalent that conforms to checkpoint 1.1 (e.g., an ongoing update of weather conditions) or link to an equivalent that conforms to checkpoint 1.1 (e.g., a link to a weather Web site).

  6. If a presentation that contains only audio or only video requires users to respond interactively at specific times during the presentation, then a synchronized equivalent presentation (audio, visual or text) is provided.

    if a pure audio or pure video presentation requires a user to respond interactively at specific times in the presentation, then a time-synchronized equivalent (audio, visual or text) presentation is provided

Exception:
If content that is rebroadcast from another medium or resource meets accessibility requirements for that medium, then the rebroadcast satisfies this checkpoint if it complies with other applicable sections of WCAG 2.0

PROPOSED Success Criteria with LEVELS



NORMATIVE

SUCCESS CRITERIA for 1.2

Level 1

  1. 1.2 - SC1 - An audio description of visual events is provided for audio-visual media

  2. 1.2 - SC2 - Captions are provided for all significant dialogue and sounds in time-dependent material.

Level 2

Not Finished

Level 3

Not Finished

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.2

    EDITORS NOTE:
      This whole Checkpoint (1.2) needs reworking. Perhaps move some down from above, or limit the items above to just certain classes of content - and then put the rest of the coverage (for other types of content) here.

  1. Synchronized captions and audio descriptions are provided for all live broadcasts

    captions and audio descriptions are provided for all live broadcasts

  2. The presentation does not require the user to read captions and follow the visual presentation simultaneously

    the presentation does not require the user to read captions and the visual presentation simultaneously in order to understand the content



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.2
  • People who are deaf or have a hearing loss can access the auditory information through the captions.

  • People who are blind or have low vision as well as those with cognitive disabilities who have difficulty interpreting visually what is happening benefit from the audio descriptions of visual information.

    People who are blind or have low vision as well as those with cognitive disabilities who have difficulty interpreting visually what is happening benefit from the audio descriptions of visual information that is required to understand the presentation.



Who Else Benefits from 1.2 (media equivalents)
  • People in noisy environments or environments with muted sound often rely on captions.

  • Captions help many people to develop language and reading skills

  • Audio descriptions provide visual information for people who are temporarily looking away from the video presentation, for example, when following an instructional video and looking at their hands

  • Captions and text descriptions make it possible to index and search media files.

    NOTE:
    Time-dependent presentations that require people to use a single sense to follow two or more things at the same time may present significant barriers to some users. Depending on the nature of the presentation, it may be possible to avoid scenarios where, for example, a deaf user would be required to watch an action on the screen and read the captions at the same time. However, this may not be available for live broadcasts (for example, a football game). Where possible (especially for education and training materials), content that does not require tracking multiple simultaneous events with the same sense, or, give the user the ability to freeze the video so that captions can be read without missing the video.

INFORMATIVE
EXAMPLES of 1.2
  • Example 1: A movie clip with audio description and captions.

    A clip from a movie is published on a Web site. In the clip, a child is trying to attract a puppy to the child's bedroom by laying a trail of crumbs. The child mumbles inaudibly to himself as he places the crumbs on the stairs.

    To someone who cannot see the video, it is not obvious that the child is laying a trail of crumbs since the soundtrack includes only the child's mumbling. The audio description that is heard when the child is silent with the child's mumbling says "Charlie puts a crumb on each stair leading to his room." The caption that appears as he mumbles reads, "[inaudible mumbling]".

    A clip from a movie is published on a Web site. In the clip, a child is trying to attract a puppy to the child's bedroom by laying a trail of crumbs. The child mumbles inaudibly to himself as he lays the trail. When not watching the video, it is not obvious that he is laying a trail of crumbs since the soundtrack includes only the child's mumbling. The audio description that is interspersed with the child's mumbling says "Charlie puts a crumb on each stair leading to his room." The caption that appears as he mumbles is, "[inaudible mumbling]."

  • Example 2: A video clip of a news story.

    A video clip accompanies a news story about flooding in a major city. The reporter gives a verbal description of the scene. No audio description is necessary. The captions display what the reporter is saying.

    A video clip accompanies a news story about the recent flooding in a major city. The reporter describes what is seen, for everyone. No audio description is necessary. The captions display what the reporter is saying.

  • Example 3: A silent animation.

    An animation shows a pantomime with a white face and black costume climbing an invisible ladder. There is no audio track for this animation. No captions or audio description are required. Instead, a text label and description are provided, as required by Guideline 1.1.

    An animation shows a pantomime climbing a ladder. There is no audio track for this animation. No captions or audio description are required. Instead, a text equivalent is provided as described in checkpoint 1.1.




PROPOSED


Guideline 1.3 [C3]
Make information, structure, and functionality recognizable even when users or user agents change the presentation format.
OR
Preserve information, structure, and functionality when changing visual or auditory presentation format.

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.3 Information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.3

  1. Data models or markup are used to enable assistive technology to recognize relationships among content elements, including (but not limited to) those listed below:

    1. Hierarchical elements and relationships, such as headings, paragraphs and lists

    2. Non-hierarchical relationships between elements such as:

      • cross-references and linkages,
      • associations between labels and controls,
      • associations between table cells and their headers

        EDITORS NOTE:
        js: these should probably be listed as examples of hierarchical relationships instead of non-hierarchical

    3. emphasis on specific words and phrases

    the following can be derived programmatically (that is through markup or a data model which is compatible with assistive technology) from the content without requiring user interpretation of presentation.

    1. hierarchical elements and relationships, such as headings, paragraphs and lists

    2. non-hierarchical relationships between elements such as cross-references and linkages, associations between labels and controls, associations between table cells and their headers, etc.

    3. emphasis on specific words and phrases

  2. Any information presented through color is also available without color (for example through context or markup or coding that does not depend on color). [I#317]

    any information presented through color is also available without color (e.g. through context or markup or non-color dependent coding).

  3. Text is not presented over a background image or pattern, or if a background image or pattern is present the the text is easily readable when the page is viewed in black and white.

    Text content is not presented over a background image or pattern OR the text is easily readable when the page is viewed in black and white (no grayscale).

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.3

  1. Information presented using color is also available without color, for example through context or markup or coding that does not depend on color.[I#317]

    any information presented using color is also available without color and without having to interpret markup

  2. Blinking content can be turned off.

    any blinking content can be turned off



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.3
  • People with cognitive and learning impairments; people with visual impairments; and people with limited use of their hands benefit from the ability to navigate by structural elements.

    Separating content and structure from presentation allows Web pages to be presented differently to meet the needs and constraints of different users without losing any of the information or structure. For example, information can be presented via speech or braille (text) that was originally intended to be presented visually.

  • People with cognitive and learning impairments; people with visual impairments; people with limited use of their hands; and people with hearing impairments benefit when information, structure, and functionality are preserved in all presentation formats.

    It can also facilitate automatic emphasis of structure or more efficient navigation.

  • People with cognitive and learning impairments; people with visual impairments; and people with hearing impairments benefit from the ability to emphasize structural elements automatically in the form best suited to their needs.

    All of these can benefit people with cognitive, physical, hearing, and visual disabilities.



Who Else Benefits from 1.3 (Recognizable information, structure, and functionality)
  • Everybody (Placeholder)

  • The Elderly (Placeholder)

INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.3
  • Example 1: A multi-column document.

    A document is marked up with headings, paragraphs and other structural features. It is presented visually in three columns. The markup that creates the columns is separate from the markup that specifies the structural features of the document.

    A document is marked up with headings, paragraphs and other structural features. It is presented visually in three columns. The markup that creates the columns is separate from the markup that specifies the logical structure of the document

  • Example 2: a scrolling list of stock prices.

    Current stock prices are scrolled horizontally across the screen. The data are separate from the methods used to scroll the text across the page.

    Current stock quotes are scrolled horizontally across the screen. The data are separate from the methods used to scroll the text across the page.

  • Example 3: A 3-dimensional site map.

    A custom interface uses a data source to generate three-dimensional visualizations of the pages on a site and how they relate to one another. Hierarchical relationships, groupings, cross-references, etc. are defined in the data source so that alternate interfaces that expose the structure of the site in an accessible way could be rendered from the same data source. (See also checkpoint 4.3)

    A custom user interface renders 3D visualizations of the pages on a site and how they relate to one another from a data source. Any hierarchical relationships, groupings, cross-references, etc. would originate in the data source so that alternate interfaces could be rendered (from the same source) that expose the structure of the site in an accessible form. (See also checkpoint 4.3)

  • Example 4: A list that allows users to sort information on a page in different ways

    A script allows a user to rearrange a listing of music files by date, artist, genre, or file size. The script updates both the structure and the presentation appropriately when generating alternate views.

    A list that allows users to sort information on a page according to preference.

    A script allows a user to rearrange a listing of music files by date, artist, genre, or file size. The script updates both the structure and the presentation a ppropriately when generating alternate views.




PROPOSED


Guideline 1.4 [C4]
For text, use fonts that can be represented in Unicode

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.4 All text can be decoded into words represented in Unicode.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.4

EDITORS NOTE:
  The CKW reorganization suggested that this checkpoint be combined with checkpoint 3.2. [js 10/28: if the proposed rewording for Guideline 1.4 is accepted by WCAG WG, the CKW recommendation will not work.] [I#442]

  1. Text is provided in Unicode or can be automatically converted to Unicode

    OR

    Text is provided in Unicode or information is available in metadata that enables automatic conversion to Unicode.

    text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.4

  1. Abbreviations and acronyms are clearly identified each time they occur if they are identical to a word in the document’s language that has a different meaning. (See also checkpoint 3.1) [I#341]

    abbreviations and acronyms are clearly identified each time they occur if they collide with a word in the standard language that would also logically appear in the same case (e.g. all caps). (See also checkpoint 3.1)

  2. Symbols such as diacritic marks that are found in standard usage of the natural language of the content, and that are necessary for precise identification of words, are present, or another standard mechanism for clear identification is provided.

    symbols such as diacritic marks that are found in standard usage of the natural language of the content, and that are necessary for unambiguous identification of words, are present or another standard mechanism for disambiguation is provided.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.4
  • People with learning disabilities and cognitive impairments, and people using refreshable Braille displays and speech synthesizers, benefit from precise identification of individual characters and words.

  • People who are learning to read and people whose native language is different from the language of the document benefit from precise identification of characters and words

    Facilitating unambiguous decoding of characters and words in content is also helpful for individuals who are learning to read or learning a second language.



Who Else Benefits from 1.4 (Unicode)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.4
  • Example 1: An acronym in a page heading

    In the heading, "People of the W3C," the letters "W3C" are marked as an acronym. When the user agent encounters this acronym, it speaks the words "World Wide Web Consortium" instead of reading the letters one at a time.

    In the following heading, "People of the W3C." the acronym "W3C" is marked as an acronym. Because it has been marked properly, the user agent would be able to speak the letters of the acronym one at a time rather than attempting to pronounce it as though it were a word.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/24: This doesn't make sense. JAWS pronounces "W Three C" because it can't parse "W3C" as a word; tagging it as an <acronym> has nothing to do with it. A better example might be <acronym title="Flawn Academic Center">FAC</acronym>, where JAWS would otherwise pronounce "fack" because the three letters can be sounded together in English. But what we really need here is an example of an acronym that is also a regular word. For example, <acronym title="House of Independent Democratic Executives">HIDE</acronym> And we need an example of something where diacritics matter, e.g., in Hebrew or other language where the Unicode mapping can be demonstrated




EXTENDED Guidelines for Principle 1

PROPOSED


Checkpoint 1.5 [E1]
Make structure perceivable
OR
Make structure perceivable through presentation [I#439]

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.5 Structure has been made perceivable through presentation.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.5

  1. Structural elements can be recognized by the way they look, the way they sound, or both

    the structural elements present have a different visual appearance or auditory characteristic from each other and from body text.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.5

  1. Structural emphasis is evident on multiple display devices, (for example, black and white monitors, small screens, monaural audio playback devices, etc.).

    the structural emphases are chosen to be distinct on different major visual display types (for example black and white, small display, mono audio playback).

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/25: had to delete "visual" because it's incompatible with the reference to mono audio playback

  2. Content is constructed so that users can change the visual appearance or auditory properties of structural elements.

    Content is constructed such that users can control the presentation of structural elements or the emphasis on the structure can be varied through alternate presentation formats.



INFORMATIVE

ADDITIONAL NOTES for 1.5

  1. To emphasize structure visually, use font variations, styles, and sizes in addition to white space, color, and graphics.

    OLD 1. for visual presentations, font variations, styles, size and white space can be used to emphasize structure
    OLD 2. color and graphics can be used to emphasis structure

  2. To emphasize structure audibly, use different voice characteristics and other sounds to indicate section headings and other structural elements.

    for auditory presentations, different voice characteristics and/sounds can be used for major headings, sections and other structural elements.

  3. If the default presentation of the structure is not distinct enough to meet the needs of a specific user group within the audience for the content, then additional graphics, colors, sounds, and other aspects of presentation can be used to emphasize the structure.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/25: Do we want to say, "… then an alternate presentation that features additional graphics, etc."? or are we recommending changes to the default presentation?

    if content is targeted for a specific user group and the presentation of the structured content is not obvious enough to meet the needs of your audience, additional graphics, colors, sounds, and other aspects of presentation can be used to emphasize the structure.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.5

Here are some of the ways in which users benefit when structure is perceivable:

  • People with cognitive and visual disabilities can orient themselves within the content;
  • People with cognitive and visual disabilities can move quickly through the content and notice major divisions;
  • People with visual or cognitive disabilities can focus on important content; and
  • People with visual, auditory, or cognitive disabilities, can recognize idifferent types of content.

Presentation that emphasizes structure:

  • enables users with cognitive and visual disabilities to orient themselves within the content;

  • enables all users to move quickly through the content and notice major divisions;

  • enables all users, and especially users with visual or cognitive disabilities, to focus on important content; and

  • enables all users, and especially users with visual or cognitive disabilities, to distinguish different types of content.



Who Else Benefits from 1.5 (Emphasized Structure)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.5
  • Example 1: Visual and auditory presentation of structure in documentation for a product

    Changes in font and auditory emphasis let users see or hear the logical hierarchy of the text. For example, headings for major sections appear in a larger, bolder font than headings of less important sections and are spoken in a lower-pitched voice. Long quotations are indented from the left and right margins, and short beeps indicate where the quotations begin and end. Other tones identify keystrokes to be entered by the user, which are separated from the body text and shown in a different font; text boxes that highlight additional tips have a shaded background and a characteristic background sound; etc.

    These visual and auditory cues help users understand the document hierarchy and the relationships among different elements.

    Example 1: documentation for a product.

    Identifying chapters in the structure of a book is appropriate and accepted use of labeling the structure. Within the chapters, headings identify (label) changes in context and highlight ideas contained in the following text. Subtle differences between the appearance of the chapter title and the section headings helps the user understand the hierarchy and relationship between the title and headings. The only difference might be font size and margin indentation when presented visually, and spoken in a difference voice or preceded by a sound when presented auditorily

  • Example 2: A data table.

    Groups of rows and columns are identified as headers. Screen readers report both headers and data when the user moves from cell to cell within the table.

    Groups of rows or columns are labeled with headers.

  • EDITORS NOTE:
    khs 10/30: This old #3 below is now covered in #1

    Example 3: an audio presentation.

    An audio rendering of a document, generated according to a style sheet, uses a different, more formal voice to read titles and headers so the listener can easily identify the words as a title and not part of the running text.




PROPOSED


Guideline 1.6 [E2]
In visual presentations, make it easy to distinguish foreground words and images from the background
OR
Differentiate between foreground and background content in visual presentations

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.6 Foreground content is easily differentiable from background for visual default presentations.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.6

  1. When displaying text against a background, provide a method to make the contrast between foreground and background greater than ____ as measured by ____.

    text that is presented over a background color or grayscale has a mechanism that allows the text to be presented in a fashion that has a contrast greater than ______ between text and background color as measured by ______.[I#344]

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.6

  1. When text content is presented over a background image or pattern, the text is easily readable when the page is viewed on a monitor that supports 256 shades of gray.

    when text content is presented over a background image or pattern, the text is easily readable when the page is viewed in 256 grayscale.

    EDITORS NOTE:
      this item may be moved or updated if the proposal for adding an extended checkpoint on color is accepted.

  2. When in default presentation mode the text content is presented over a background image or pattern, the text is easily readable when the page is viewed on a monitor that supports 256 shades of gray.

    this item should read identically to the required item #2, except that it should say "in default presentation mode."

    EDITORS NOTE:
      The working group is seeking an algorithm that measures contrast in a way that is accurate and testable enough that we could include it in the Principles. One algorithm, which comes from the Techniques For Accessibility Evaluation And Repair Tools document, is currently under consideration for inclusion in the techniques, but the group has not yet found something that is specific enough to be included at the Principles level.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.6
  • Individuals with low vision can easily make out characters in the content even if they don't have the wide field of view or full range of color perception used by fully sighted persons to separate text from background images.

  • Individuals with cognitive or attentional disorders who have difficulty separating foreground from background may find it easier to locate important information.



Who Else Benefits from 1.6 (??)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.6
  • Example 1: A background image on a page.

    A background image and text are arranged so that there is no image behind the text or the image is so faint that the difference between the text and the darkest part of the image meets the requirements of this checkpoint. The image behind the text does not contain lines that might interfere with character recognition.

    A background image and text are arranged so that there is no image behind the text or the image is so faint that the difference between the darkest part of the image and the text (which is dark) meets the standard foreground/background contrast requirements. The image behind the text also does not contain lines that are about the same width as the characters so they do not interfere with character recognition.




PROPOSED


Guideline 1.7 [E3]
In default auditory presentations, make it easy to distinguish foreground speech and sounds from background sounds.

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.7 Foreground content is easily differentiable from background for auditory default presentations.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.7

  1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content.

    audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background sounds are at least 20 db lower than the foreground audio content.

    NOTE:
    A 20 decibels (db) difference in sound level is roughly 4 times quieter (or louder). Background sound that meets this requirement will be approximately four times (4x) quieter than the foreground audio content.



INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.7

  1. NONE at this TIME



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.7
  • People with hearing impairments that limit their ability to hear speech at all frequencies are better able to recognize the main audio content without interference from background noise.

    Individuals with hearing impairments that limit their ability to hear all of the frequencies of speech can make out the words from the sounds they can hear because they are not mixed with residual sounds from the music.

  • People who do not have access to a text transcript can hear and understand audio presentations.

  • People with attentional disorders that make it difficult for them to pick out the important sounds in a noisy environment will be better able to hear the difference between what is important and what is not.

  • People with limited knowledge of the language of the audio content will find it easier to understand spoken material.

    EDITORS NOTE:
      js: I took the liberty of adding some more examples



Who Else Benefits from 1.7 (distinguishing between foreground speech and sounds from background sounds)
  • People who do not have access to a text transcript can hear and understand audio presentations.

  • People with limited knowledge of the language of the audio content will find it easier to understand spoken material.

INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.7
  • Example 1: Speech over background sounds

    A video clip shows two people talking at a political meeting. In the soundtrack, their dialog is clearly audible and understandable above the buzz of other conversations in the background.

    Example 1: A background image on a page.

    A background image and text are arranged so that there is no image behind the text or the image is so faint that the difference between the darkest part of the image and the text (which is dark) meets the standard foreground/background contrast requirements. The image behind the text also does not contain lines that are about the same width as the characters so they do not interfere with character recognition.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/26: I modified the example (a) to make it concrete and (b) to eliminate the potentially confusing reference to captions. I also added the example below

  • Example 2: A Webcast of a live sporting event

    A football match is broadcast over the Web in real time. The commentators' description of the action is clearly audible against the background cheers of the spectators.

    Example 2: Speech over background sounds.

    Because speech is often naturally mixed with background sounds (movies, live news etc) and cannot be easily removed or separated, captions are provided (under checkpoint 1.2) to make dialog understandable. However not all people can see or read the captions. Where speech is mixed or recorded so that it is at least 20 db above any background sounds people do not need to rely on captions to understand the dialog.




PROPOSED


Guideline 1.8 [E4]
Make sure that people who do not have access to color displays will be able to perceive all content
OR
Information presented in color is also available in the absence of color

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 1.8 [color vision is not required to perceive content (or something like this to allow color-coding issues to exist at extended checkpoint level)]


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 1.8

  1. Information conveyed through color is also recognizable in the absence of color.

    (something to achieve an effect where information can be perceived with common color deficiencies)

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 1.8

  1. Important information is provided in content or through markup as well as color.

    content can be perceived with no color vision



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 1.8


Who Else Benefits from 1.8 (Information being color independent)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 1.8





PROPOSED


Principle 2: OPERABLE.
Any user should be able to operate all Interface Elements that are part of the content

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Guideline 2: OPERABLE. Ensure that Interface Elements in the Content are Operable by Any User


Core Guidelines for Principle 2

PROPOSED


Guideline 2.1 [C5]
Make it possible for people who use only a keyboard or a keyboard interface to operate all functionality

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 2.1 All functionality is operable at a minimum through a keyboard or a keyboard interface.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 2.1

  1. All of the functionality of the content is operable through a keyboard or keyboard interface.

    All of the functionality of the content, where the functionality or its outcome can be expressed in words,is operable through a keyboard or keyboard interface

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/26: Do we have examples of a function or outcome that cannot be expressed in words? If not, we should strike the phrase.

    NOTE:
    Refer to checkpoint 4.3 for information regarding user agent support.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 2.1

  1. Wherever the technology that provides functionality allows a choice between specifying the results of a user action and requiring a particular action that depends upon a specific input or output device, the code specifies the desired result instead of the action. For example, if the technology supports a choice between an abstract select function and a function that requires a mouse-click, the select function is used.

    wherever a choice between event handlers is available and supported, the more abstract event is used.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 2.1
  • Individuals who cannot use pointing devices can use a keyboard or keyboard interface to access the functionality

    Individuals who are blind(and cannot use pointing devices) can have access to the functionality of the Web content or site.

  • Individuals with severe physical disabilities can use speech input (which emulates keystrokes) to both enter data and operate interface elements.

    Individuals with severe physical disabilitiescan use speech input (which simulates keystrokes) to both enter data and operate the interface elements on the page.



Who Else Benefits from 2.1 (Keyboard Operable Controls)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 2.1
  • Example 1: Operation with multiple input devices.

    The content relies only on focus-in, focus-out, and activation events; these are defined in the API of the environment for which the content is written, and are intended to be operable by a variety of input devices, including pointing devices, keyboards and speech input systems.

  • Example 1: Examples of Web content that would and would not be operable from a keyboard or keyboard interface

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: The current examples require extensive reworking to make them consistent with examples under other guidelines. We need concrete examples that illustrate the ideas listed here. If someone else can come up with those examples I'll do my best to reword for clarity and simplicity

    • If it's written to be operable from a computer keyboard, it conforms. (because it is operable from the keyboard.)

    • If it's written to be used on a device that doesn't usually have a keyboard such as a cell phone and but it can be controlled by an optional keyboard for that device, it conforms. (A person who needs a keyboard - or alternate keyboard - can use it to control the application.)

    • If it's written to be used with a device that doesn't have a keyboard, but it could also be used by similar devices that do and it would work with their keyboard, it conforms. (A person who needs a keyboard would not buy the device without the keyboard. That device may itself not be considered accessible. But the content can be controlled from a device with a keyboard and therefore conforms to this checkpoint.)

    • If it's written to work with devices that do not have keyboards and it can not be used by any other devices that do have keyboards, then it does not conform. (It cannot be accessed via keyboard.)




PROPOSED


Guideline 2.2 [C6]
Give users control of time limits imposed on their reading, interaction, or responses unless the nature of real-time events or competition makes such control impossible
OR
Allow users to control any time limits on their reading, interaction, or responses unless the nature of real-time events or rules of competition make such control impossible

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 2.2 Users can control any time limits on their reading, interaction, or responses unless control is not possible due to nature of real-time events or competition


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 2.2

  1. Content is designed so that time limits are not an essential part of interaction, or at least one of the following is true for each interaction for which a time limit has been set:

    content is designed so that time limits are not an essential part of interaction or at least one of the following is true for each time limit:

    • the user is allowed to deactivate the time limit;

    • the user is allowed to adjust the time limit over a wide range which is at least ten times the length of the default setting

      EDITORS NOTE:
      js 10/26: deleted because there's no way for most developers to determine this

      or the user is allowed to adjust the time limit over a wide range which is at least ten times or default setting or average user's preference,

    • the user is warned before time expires and given at least 10 seconds to extend the time limit

      EDITORS NOTE:
      js 10/26: 10 seconds isn't long enough. MS Windows used to give you 15 seconds to accept changes to the Display control panel, and it wasn't long enough to let me listen to the entire dialog and then tab to the OK button.

      or the user is warned before time expires and given at least 10 seconds to extend the time limit,

    • the time limit is due to a real-time event (for example an auction) and no alternative to the time limit is possible,

    • or the time limit is part of a competitive activity where timing is an essential part of the activity (for example competitive gaming; an online test must be completed within a set time and the test administrator can increase the time limit for people with disabilities who are legally entitled to additional time).

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 2.2

  1. Moving content can be permanently or temporarily stopped using the keyboard

    any moving content can be frozen using the keyboard[I#325]



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 2.2
  • People with reading disabilities, cognitive disabilities, and learning disabilities often need more time than most people to read and comprehend written text.

    People with reading disabilities, cognitive disabilities, and learning disabilities often need more time than most people to read and comprehend written text.

  • People with low vision who use screen magnification software benefit from improved ability to track content that moves.

  • People with physical disabilities might not be able to move quickly or accurately enough to interact with moving objects.

  • People who do not see well, people who cannot read quickly or follow rapidly changing events, and people with limited use of their hands benefit from the ability to extend the length of time when information and interactive options are available

    Content that is updated often might not be processed and read in time or in the proper order by an assistive technology or voice browser.



Who Else Benefits from 2.2 (??)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 2.2
  • Content that requires comprehension or a response within a timed interval:

    • a screen that is automatically refreshed every 5 seconds
    • Pages that automatically redirect the browser to a different page or site
    • blinking or scrolling text
    • A dialog box that disappears automatically after a short period
    • A page that automatically logs the user out if no activity occurs within a set amount of time

    Examples of content that requires user understanding or a response within a timed interval:

    • automatic refresh

    • redirection

    • blinking or scrolling text

    • dialog that disappears after a short period

    • shutdown or deactivation of page if activity is not received in a set amount of time

  • Example 1: Blinking text

    Client-side scripting is used to create blinking text. The Users can select an option to turn off the blinking throughout the site.

    Client-side scripting is used to create blinking text. The user can deactivate the use of scripting in his or her browser or override the use of scripts with a user style sheet.

  • Example 2: A news site that is updated regularly

    A news site causes its front page to be updated every 30 minutes. The front page contains minimal text and primarily consists of links to content. A user who does not wish the page to update selects a checkbox. The checkbox is in the "user preferences" portion of the site which is one of the first links on each page.

    A news site causes its front page to be updated every 1/2 hour. The front page contains minimal text and primarily consists of links to content. A user who does not wish the page to update selects a checkbox. The checkbox is in the "user preferences" portion of the site which is one of the first links on each page.

  • Example 3: A multiple-choice test

    An online examination is scheduled to last 50 minutes. The administrator changes the time to 75 minutes to accommodate a student with a learning disability. Other students must still complete the test in 50 minutes

    An online banking site limits each session to 15 minutes. The Webmaster increases the time limit for a customer with cerebral palsy.




PROPOSED


Guideline 2.3 [C7]
Allow users to avoid content that is designed to flicker

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 2.3 User can avoid experiencing screen flicker.


EDITORS NOTE:
(06/10/03) This Checkpoint is currently included in the Core set of Checkpoints because the WCAG WG expects that it will be possible to test content for flicker and the result will be a flicker rate in Hz that can be stored in a machine-readable format. If the assumption regarding a testing tool does not hold at time of final review of these Principles, this checkpoint will be moved to the Extended set of Checkpoints."

NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 2.3

  1. At least one of the following is true:

    1. Content was not designed to flicker (or flash) in the range of 3 to 49 Hz (between 3 to 49 times per second).

      content was not designed to flicker (or flash) in the range of 3 to 49 Hz.

    2. If flickering content must be used, users are warned about the flicker before they go to the page, and are informed that an alternative version has been provided which approximates the original version as closely as possible without flickering.

      if flicker is unavoidable, the user is warned of the flicker before they go to the page, and as close a version of the content as is possible without flicker is provided.

    EDITORS NOTE:
      We would like to include a third criteria here that would state that a test that was conducted and the pages passed. No test or tool exists yet though. We're looking into how such a test and/or tool might be designed.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 2.3

  1. Animation or other content does not visibly or purposely flicker between 3 and 49 Hz.

  2. Content that might create a problem has been tested [using XYZ tool]; only pages with unavoidable flicker remain and appropriate warnings along with a close alternative presentation have been provided for these pages.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/26: These "best practice measures" seem almost identical to the success criteria listed above



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 2.3
  • People with photosensitive epilepsy benefit from the absence of flickering content. For these individuals, seizures can be triggered by flickering in the range between 3 and 49 times per second (3-49 Hz or 3-49 Hertz), with a peak sensitivity at 20 flashes per second.

    Individuals with photosensitive epilepsy can have seizures triggered by flickering or flashing in the 3 to 49 flashes per second (Hertz) range with a peak sensitivity at 20 flashes per second.

  • People who are easily distracted may be able to concentrate better if they are not distracted by content flickering in the visual field.

    Individuals who are easily distracted may not be able to focus on page content with flicker occurring in the same visual field.



Who Else Benefits from 2.3 (Avoiding Flicker)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 2.3



EXTENDED Guidelines for Principle 2

PROPOSED


Guideline 2.4 [E5]
Make it easy for users to browse the resource, to know their place in it, and to find information they need
OR
Content includes mechanisms to facilitate orientation and movement

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 2.4 Mechanisms have been added to facilitate orientation and movement in content.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 2.4

EDITORS NOTE:
  The CKW reorganization proposed that all of the items in required be removed and proposed a rewording of the item in best practice that addressed logical, linear reading order. [I#441]

  1. In documents containing more than 50,000 words or sites larger than 50 perceived pages, at least one of the following is provided.

    1. Markup to identify hierarchical structure and other, non-hierarchical relationships such as cross-references, internal links, etc.

      hierarchical structure mark up

    2. Table of Contents

      Table of contents (or site map)

    3. Site Map

    4. Alternate display orders

      Alternate display orders (or alternate site navigation mechanisms)

    5. Alternate site navigation mechanisms

  2. Large blocks of material that are repeated on multiple pages, such as navigation menus with more than 7 links, site banners, etc., can be bypassed by people who use screen readers or who navigate via keyboard or keyboard interface.

    Users are able to skip over large blocks of repetitive material, navigational bars or other blocks of links that are greater than 7 when reading with a synthesizer or navigating using keyboard. [I#323]

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 2.4

  1. The content has been reviewed, taking into account the following strategies for facilitating orientation and movement and applying them as appropriate.

    1. breaking up text into logical paragraphs

    2. dividing documents, especially very long ones, into hierarchical sections and subsections with clear and informative titles

      providing hierarchical sections and titles, particularly for longer documents

    3. Supplying a unique and informative title for each page or resource that can be accessed independently (for example, from a Search Results page)

    4. Revealing important non-hierarchical relationships, such as cross-references, or the correspondence between header and data cells in a data table, so that the relationships are represented unambiguously in the markup or data model

      EDITORS NOTE:
      js 10/27: I don't understand the relationship between "revealing" relationships and representing them in the markup. Who wo what does the revealing, and how?]

      revealing important non-hierarchical relationships, such as cross-references, or the correspondence between header and data cells in a table, so that they are represented unambiguously in the markup or data model

    5. Dividing very large works into sections and or chapters with logical labels

      EDITORS NOTE:
      js 10/26: seems redundant with B, above

    6. Others?

  2. Information is provided that would allow an assistive technology to determine at least one logical sequence in which to read a document.

    information is provided that would allow an assistive technology to determine at least one logical, linear reading order.

  3. Diagrams are constructed so that they have structure that users can access.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js 10/26: Does this belong somewhere under Principle 1, since it seems to have more to do with making structure perceivable than making it operable? Or should we revise this to bring out the operable characteristics of the diagram?

    diagrams are constructed in a fashion so that they have structure that can be accessed by the user.

  4. Logical tab order has been created where possible

    where possible, logical tab order has been created.I#319]



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 2.4
  • When the logical structure is provided in markup or a data model,

    • Users with physical disabilities can use structure to more easily jump between paragraphs, chapters, sections etc.

    • Users with cognitive disabilitiescan use structure (chapter titles, headers, etc.) to provide more context for the text that follows them. They also provide warning of a change in context and reorient the user to the new focus.

    • Users with blindnessor low vision can jump from header to header to get an overview or to more quickly "skim" to the section they are interested in.

    • Readers with low vision can sometimes (depending on display technology) change how chapter titles and headers are displayed to make them more visible -and easier to use when skimming the document.

    • the content can be presented on a variety of devices because the device software can choose only those elements of the content that it is able to display and display them in the most effective way for that device.

  • Providing different navigation mechanisms can provide a better match between different people's skills, background knowledge, visual vs. text orientation, and the type of information they are seeking at the moment.

  • Individuals with cognitive disabilities may find it easier to ask for what they want than to deduce its location from categorical choices.

  • Individuals with low vision or blindness may find search techniques that fetch everything that relates to a topic of interest to be easier than techniques that require them to scan lists or pages for the items.



Who Else Benefits from 2.4 (Providing Navigation Mechanisms)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 2.4
  • Example 1: A physics dissertation

    A dissertation contains well-defined sections such as "Abstract," "Table of Contents," "Chapter 1," etc. The pieces in each section (paragraphs, subheadings, quotes) are denoted with structural markup.

  • Example 2: A scalable image of a bicycle

    Lines and a circle (spokes and rim) are grouped into a "wheel." Lines in a triangle that attach to each wheel are grouped into a "frame."

  • Example 3: User interface.

    User interface controls are divided into organized groups.




PROPOSED


Guideline 2.5 [E6]
Help users avoid mistakes and make it easy to correct them
OR
Provide methods to minimize error and allow easy recovery

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 2.5 Methods are provided to minimize error and provide graceful recovery.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 2.5

EDITORS NOTE:
 The CKW proposal suggested that this required success criterion be combined with one of the best practice items and that another best practice item be moved up. [I#440]

  1. Information that is given to users about mistakes or problems conforms to these guidelines

    if an error is detected, feedback is provided to the user identifying the error (in an accessible form that meets core checkpoints).

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 2.5

  1. Users are allowed to select from a list of options as well as to enter text directly

    where possible, the user is allowed to select from a list of options as well as to generate input text directly

  2. Errors are described and instructions or suggestions for correction are provided

    errors are identified specifically and suggestions for correction are provided where possible

  3. checks for misspelled words are applied and correct spellings are suggested when text entry is required.

  4. where consequences are significant and time-response is not important, one of the following is true:

    1. actions are reversible

    2. where actions are not reversible, they are checked for errors before going on to the next step in a process

      where not reversible, actions are checked for errors in advance

    3. where actions are not reversible, and cannot be checked in advance, the user is able to review and confirm or correct information before submitting it

      where not reversible, and not checkable, a confirmation is asked before acceptance



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 2.5
  • Individuals with writing disabilities and people with dyslexia often benefit when spelling is checked in situations that require users to enter text

    Individuals with writing disabilities and people with dyslexiaoften have difficulty writing text in forms or other places that need text input.

  • People with trembling hands or other conditions that make it difficult to type accurately benefit when spelling is checked before submitting text

  • People with speech disabilities can benefit from the opportunity to correct information they have entered by speaking

    Individuals with speech disabilities might not be recognized properly in voice input applications.



Who Else Benefits from 2.5 (Avoiding Errors)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 2.5
  • Example 1: A search engine

    A search engine has options for different skill levels and preferences. It includes a spell checker and offers "best guess" alternatives, query-by-example searches, and similarity searches.

    A search engine is provided with a variety of search options for different skill levels and preferences. It includes a spell checker and offers "best guess" alternatives, query-by-example searches, and similarity searches.









PROPOSED


Principle 3: UNDERSTANDABLE.
Content and controls should be understandable to as many users as possible

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Guideline 3: UNDERSTANDABLE. Make content and controls understandable to as many users as possible.


CORE Guidelines for Principle 3

PROPOSED


Guideline 3.1 [C8]
Make it possible for automated devices to identify languages used in the content

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 3.1 Language of content can be programmatically determined.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 3.1

  1. The natural language of the document as a whole can be identified by automated tools, including assistive technology.

    passages or fragments of text occurring within the content that are written in a language other than the primary natural language of the content as a whole, are identified, including specification of the language of the passage or fragment.

  2. In text documents, the language of any passage or phrase that is not written in the primary natural language of the document can be identified by automated tools, including assistive technology

    Document attributes identify the natural language of the document.

    Exceptions:

    1. The requirement above does not apply to foreign words or phrases that are found in unabridged dictionaries for the natural language of the content.
    2. This success criterion does not apply to imaginary words, dialect abbreviations, or other words that are not found in unabridged Dictionaries of the primary natural language in which the document is written.

EDITORS NOTE:
 In techniques discussion, it has been argued that language attributes for documents are as important as identifying changes in language within documents. Moving it up here for future discussion.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 3.1

  1. Needed
  2. Needed




INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 3.1
  • People who are blind benefit when screen readers correctly pronounce the text of documents that include passages in more than one language. (Screen readers can switch automatically to the appropriate pronunciation rules when language changes are properly identified.)

    Phrases from various languages, acronyms and abbreviations are often interspersed in writing. When these phrases are identified, a speech synthesizer can voice text with the appropriate accent and pronunciation. When they are not identified, the speech synthesizer will use the default accent and pronunciation of the language on the rest of the page, which can make the phrase unintelligible. Identifying changes in language and marking abbreviations nd acronyms as such will also allow a tool to ask for automatic translations of that content. When editing content, authoring tools can switch between appropriate spelling dictionaries.



Who Else Benefits from 3.1 (Language Identification)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 3.1
  • Example 1: A French phrase in a sentence, in a document written in English.

    In the following sentence, "And with a certain je ne sais quoi, she entered both the room, and his life, forever." the phrase "je ne sais quoi" is marked as French. Screen readers automatically apply the rules of French pronunciation, then switch back to English for the rest of the sentence.

    A French phrase in an English sentence.

    In the following sentence, "And with a certain je ne sais quoi, she entered both the room, and his life, forever." the French phrase "je ne sais quoi" is marked as French. Depending on the markup language, English may either be marked as the language for the entire document except where specified, or marked at the paragraph level.

EDITORS NOTE:
js: We should include other examples, e.g., of documents that include material in multiple languages like the ones Yvette mentioned in a call recently




EXTENDED Guidelines for Principle 3

PROPOSED


Guideline 3.2 [E7]
The complete wording of abbreviations and acronyms can be unambiguously (clearly) determined
OR
Definitions of abbreviations and acronyms must be unambiguously determinable through complete wording

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 3.2 The definition of abbreviations and acronyms can be unambiguously determined.


EDITORS NOTE:
 The CKW reorganization suggested that this checkpoint be combined with checkpoint 1.4. [I#442]

NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 3.2

  1. acronyms and abbreviations do not appear first in standard unabridged dictionaries for the language or define the first time the first time they appear or are available in a glossary on the site.[I#330]

EDITORS NOTE:
  If a standard format for doing it can be achieved, we might require that linkages to glossaries for all abbreviations and acronyms that are created by the author or site be provided.  We could also recommend that linkages to any abbreviations, acronyms, etc. used by the authors also be provided.  We could also have a weaker recommendation for acronyms and abbreviations appearing on the site that linkages to glossaries explaining all abbreviations acronyms, etc. that appear in any documents on the site be provided.   

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 3.2

  1. a list is provided on the page or home pageof URIs to cascading dictionaries that can or should be used to define abbreviations or acronyms.[I#350]

  2. the content has been reviewed, taking into account the following strategies for determining the definition of abbreviations and acronyms, applying them as appropriate.

    1. provide a definition or link (with the first occurrence) of phrases, words, acronyms, and abbreviations specific to a particular community.

    2. provide a summary for relationships that may not be obvious from analyzing the structure of a table but that may be apparent in a visual rendering of the table.

    3. if contracted forms of words are used such that they are ambiguous, provide semantic markup to make words unique and interpretable.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 3.2
  • Defining key terms and specialized language will help people who are not familiar with the topic.

  • Providing the expansion of abbreviations and acronyms not only helps people who are not familiar with the abbreviation or acronym but can clarify which meaning of an abbreviation or acronym is appropriate to use. For example, the acronym "ADA" stands for both the American with Disabilities Act as well as the American Dental Association.



Who Else Benefits from 3.2 (??)



PROPOSED


Guideline 3.3 [E8]
Use the clearest wording that is consistent with the purpose of the content. Provide summaries or paraphrases of complex material, and provide visual or auditory illustrations as appropriate
OR
Design content that is no more complex than necessary and/or is supplemented with simpler forms of the content

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 3.3 Content is no more complex than is necessary and/or is supplemented with simpler forms of the content.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 3.3

  1. The content has been reviewed, taking into account the following strategies for reducing the complexity of the content or minimizing its impact, and applying them as appropriate.

    1. The resource uses vocabulary which is widely used by members of the intended audience.

      familiarity of terms and language structure

    2. The length and complexity of sentences are consistent with recommended best practices for the intended audience, such as those found in current textbooks about writing in the audience's field or discipline.

      reasonableness of length and complexity of sentences

    3. Paragraphs develop a single topic or subtopic

      coherence of paragraphs (and sensibility in length)

    4. Section headings and linked text are understandable when read by themselves (for example, in a screen reader's list of links or a table of contents)

      clarity of headings and linked text when read out of context

    5. Page titles are informative and unique

      accuracy and uniqueness of page titles

    6. The document uses page design, graphics, color, fonts, animations, video, or audio to clarify complex text as necessary

      care in the use of all-capital letters where normal sentence case might increase comprehension

    7. inclusion of non-text content to supplement text for key pages or sections of the site where they felt it was appropriate.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 3.3

Strategies for reducing complexity include, but are not limited to:

    In general
  1. Organize material so it is easy to read and use.

    the content has been reviewed, taking into account the strategies for evaluating the complexity of the content, applying them as appropriate.

  2. Use a style manual, dictionary, and other reference materials.

  3. Test documents to learn if potential users understand the material, and include people with cognitive, learning, or reading disabilities in the test group.

  4. Vocabulary
  5. Use vocabulary that will be familiar to intended readers.

    • If the resource is intended for people who work in a particular technical field, consider using a Controlled Language. For example, a resource designed for aircraft engineers could use a controlled language like the one used by Boeing Aircraft Company.
    • If a technical resource is intended for translation into other languages, consider using a Controlled Language.
    • If the resource is intended for a general audience or for translation into other languages, avoid professional jargon, slang, and other terms with a specialized meaning that may not be clear to people outside a specific group. Review the document for plain language, using a checklist like the ones produced by US and Canadian government agencies.
  6. EDITORS NOTE:
    js: We should include examples from other countries and other languages if possible

  7. If the resource is intended for a general audience and it is necessary to use words that have specialized meanings, define those words.

  8. When there is a choice between abstract and concrete terms, use the more concrete term unless there is a specific reason for using the abstract term.

  9. Avoid ambiguity unless it is an essential aspect of the subject-matter.

  10. Sentences
  11. Make sentence-length consistent with common practice in the language of the document or the primary audience for whom the document is intended. Consult textbooks about writing in that field or discipline.

  12. Syntax
  13. Use the simplest sentence forms consistent with the purpose of the content

    • For example, the simplest sentence-form for English consists of Subject-Verb-Object, as in John hit the ball or The Web site conforms to WCAG 2.0.
  14. Consider using bulleted or numbered lists in place of paragraphs that contain long series of words or phrases separated by commas

  15. Nouns, noun-phrases, and pronouns
  16. Use single nouns or short noun-phrases.

  17. Make sure that pronoun references and references to earlier points in the document are clear

    Example of potential ambiguity:
    The sentence below contains several pronouns whose references are not clear:

    Web developers can't understand those guidelines because they don't speak their language.

    1. It is not clear which guidelines are referred to as "those guidelines" (the guidelines you are reading now would be these guidelines)
    2. It isn't clear whether the pronoun "they" refers to the Web developers or to the guidelines (the rules of English syntax indicate that the reference is to the guidelines, but common usage doesn't always obey those rules)
    3. It isn't clear whether the pronoun "their" refers to the language used by the Web developers or the language in which the guidelines are written.

    The sentence can be rewritten to resolve the ambiguities:

    Web developers can't understand these guidelines because the guidelines are not written in the developers' language.

  18. Verbs
    Voice
  19. For documents written in English and some other Western languages, use the active voice unless there is a specific reason for using passive constructions. Sentences in the active voice are often shorter and easier to understand than those in the passive voice.

    Examples:

    • Active: Many people believe that readers understand sentences in the active voice more easily than sentences in the passive voice.
    • Passive: It is believed by many that sentences in the active voice are more easily understood by readers than sentences in the passive voice.

  20. Tenses
  21. Use verb tenses consistently.

    For example, do not switch randomly between past and present tense. In the sentences, John left the room. He takes the elevator down to the lobby, the shift from past tense (in the first sentence left the room) to present tense in the second sentence (takes the elevator) might create ambiguity about John's use of the elevator: did he use it in the past or is he using it now?

  22. Logic and relationships
  23. Indicate the logical relationships between phrases, sentences, paragraphs, or sections of the text.

    • In some cases, simple words such as and, however, furthermore, and therefore may be enough to make the logical relationship clear between one sentence and the next. Other cases may require longer phrases or even additional sentences.
  24. Instructions and operable content

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: I suggest moving the items under this heading to Guideline 2.5 (help users avoid mistakes and make it easy to correct them

  25. Thoroughly explain instructions or required actions

  26. Use names and labels consistently.

  27. Clarity where the document:

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: I don't quite understand this

    • addresses users
    • explains choices and options
    • labels options to get more information
    • instructs users how to modify selections in critical functions (such as how to delete an item from a shopping cart)
  28. Application of:

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: Not sure what the items below should be applied to

    1. Use a goal-action structure for menu prompts.
    2. default settings (and the ease in re-establishing them)

      EDITORS NOTE:
      js: I'm not sure what's intended here so can't rewrite

    3. Use two-step, "select and confirm" processes to reduce accidental selections for critical functions
    4. Provide calculation assistance to reduce the need to calculate (for example, use a script to calculate the total price for an online purchase)
  29. Alternative representations: summaries, paraphrases, examples, illustrations, and symbolic languages

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: I propose deleting the first two items under this head, which are addressed earlier in this guideline

  30. Provide summaries to aid understanding [delete- already covered]

  31. add non-text content to the site for key pages or sections specifically to make the site more understandable by users who cannot understand the text only version of the site. [delete- covered]

  32. EDITORS NOTE:
    js: WCAG 1.0 and Section 508 both allow text-only variants only in cases when the "original" can't be made accessible any other way, and then require that the text-only variant be updated whenver the "original" changes. That seems to have dropped out of WCAG 2.0, but I think we need to reinstate it.

  33. Make it possible to convert text into symbolic languages such as those used by Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: say how-through metadata? And we need an example for this one, under examples. Clearly a Level 3



INFORMATIVE
Additional Notes for Checkpoint 3.3 (Informative)

Strategies for evaluating the complexity of the content include:

  1. use of sentence structures that increase understanding

    • such as active voice in languages where this form helps convey information

  2. length of noun phrases

    • strings of no more than three or four nouns are easiest to understand

  3. clarity of reference with pronouns and anaphoric expressions (these refer back to something already said in the text)

    • example of potential ambiguity: "Scientists study monkeys. They eat bananas."

  4. correct use of conjunction forms and adverbs to make explicit the relationship between phrases or parts of the text

    • such as "and," "but," "furthermore," "not only"

  5. complexity of verb tenses

    • do the tenses used in a document seem overly complicated?

  6. intelligibility of verb phrases

  7. familiarity of idioms or slang

  8. logic in the order and flow of information

  9. consequences of ambiguity or abstraction

  10. improved readability of vertical lists might offer in place of long paragraphs of information

  11. use of summaries to aid understanding

  12. thoroughness in the explanation of instructions or required actions

  13. consistency in the use of names and labels

  14. clarity where the document:

    • addresses users

    • explains choices and options

    • labels options to get more information

    • instructs users how to modify selections in critical functions (such as how to delete an item from a shopping cart)

  15. application of:

    • proper markup to highlight key information

    • goal-action structure for menu prompts

    • default settings (and the ease in re-establishing them)

    • two-step "select and confirm" processes to reduce accidental selections for critical functions

    • calculation assistance to reduce the need to calculate

  16. testing with potential users for ease of accessibility

  17. use of a controlled language

  18. providing support for conversion into symbolic languages

  19. adding non-text content to the site for key pages or sections specifically to make the site more understandable by users who cannot understand the text only version of the site.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 3.3
  • People with cognitive, learning, or reading disabilities benefit from text that expresses complex ideas or information in a clear and simple way.

    All users, especially those with cognitive, learning, and/or reading disabilities benefit from the use of clear and simple writing. This should not discourage you from expressing complex or technical ideas.

  • People whose first language is not the same as the language used in the document, including people who use Sign languages, benefit from text that expresses complex ideas and information in a clear and simple way.

    Using clear and simple language also benefits people whose first language differs from your own, including those people who communicate primarily in sign language.

  • People with cognitive, learning, or reading disabilities benefit from clear and simple summaries of complex ideas and information.

    Sounds, graphics, videos and animations can help make concepts presented in a Web site easier to understand, especially for people with cognitive, reading, or learning disabilities or those who are unfamiliar with the language of the text of the site.

  • People with cognitive, reading, or learning disabilities may require audio, graphics, videos, or animations to understand complex ideas and information

    Summarizing information that is difficult to understand helps people who do not read well.

  • People who are blind, people who have low vision, people with dyslexia and others who have difficulty understanding visual illustrations of complex relationships benefit from written summaries of visual information.

    Providing a summary of the visual cues that show relationships between complex information helps people who do not use visual cues or who have difficulty using visual cues. For example, people who are completely blinddo not use any visual cues, while people with dyslexia or with low vision might have difficulty interpreting visual cues.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: : I suggest that we delete this one: since it basically calls for text equivalents for complex visual information, it's covered under 1.1

  • People with certain cognitive or developmental disabilities benefit from the use of symbolic languages.

  • NOTE:
    Designers need to be cautious in deciding when to use illustrations. Reading a picture is probably a learned activity that is easier for some than others. Some users skip the pictures; others read only the pictures. Designers must also recognize that visual conventions are not universal and that individuals develop their own mental schema and expectations in interpreting visual information.

    EDITORS NOTE:
    js: I propose deleting the following note or moving it to Techniques



Who Else Benefits from 3.3 (Clear Wording)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 3.3


PROPOSED


Guideline 3.4 [E9]
Use consistent layout and make the behavior of interactive elements predictable
OR
Make layout and behavior of content consistent and/or predictable

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 3.4 Layout and behavior of content is consistent or predictable, but not identical.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 3.4

  1. key orientation and navigational elements (such as navigation bars) are generally found in one or two consistent locations or their locations are otherwise predictable.

  2. where inconsistent or unpredictable responses are essential to the function of the content (for example mystery games, adventure games, tests, etc.) the user is warned in advance of encountering them.

  3. wherever there are extreme changes in context, one of the following is true:

    1. an easy to find setting, that persists for the site visit, is provided for the user to deactivate processes or features that cause extreme changes in context or

    2. extreme changes in context are identified before they occur so the user can determine if they wish to proceed or so they can be prepared for the change

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 3.4

  1. user can select a different location for navigation elements in the layout of the page.[I#352]

  2. the content has been reviewed, taking into account common ideas for making content consistent and predictable, applying them as appropriate.



INFORMATIVE
Additional Notes for 3.4
  1. common ideas for making content consistent and predictable indclude:

    1. place navigation bars in a consistent location whenever possible

    2. similar layout for user interface components should be used for sections or whole site

    3. similar user interface components should be labeled with similar terminology

    4. use headers consistently

    5. use templates for consistent presentation of sections or whole site

    6. pages with similar function should have similar appearance and layout

    7. controls that look or sound the same should be designed to act the same

    8. conventions likely to be familiar to the user should be followed

    9. unusual user interface features or behaviors that are likely to confuse the first-time user should be described to the user before they are encountered

    10. allow the user to select different page layout templates for presentation of pages. (for example 3 column, linear, adding extra orientation or navigation elements, etc.) [I#353]



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 3.4
  • Individuals who are unable to detect extreme changes in context or may not realize that the context has changed are less likely to become disoriented while navigating a site. This applies to people in the following ways:

    • Individuals who are blind or have low vision may have difficulty knowing when a visual context change, such as a new window popping up, has occurred. In this case, warning users of context changes in advance minimizes confusion when the user discovers that the back button no longer behaves as expected.

    • Using captions to note changes in speaker is beneficial for individuals who are deaf or hard-of-hearing and who may be unable to discern changes in speaker for audio-only presentations.

  • Some individuals with low vision, with dyslexia and who have difficulty interpreting visual cues may benefit from additional cues in order to detect extreme changes in context.

    NOTE:
    Providing consistent and predictable responses to user actions is important feedback for the user. This lets them know that your site is working properly and encourages them to continue interacting with the content. When the user receives an unexpected response, they might conclude that something is wrong or broken. Some people might get so confused they will not be able to use your site.



Who Else Benefits from 3.4 (Consistent Layout and Behavior)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 3.4
  • Example 1: A form to deactivate pop-up windows

    A checkbox is provided on a page of links to let the user select whether they want the resultant pages to appear in new windows or not.

  • Example 2: A warning given before a pop-up window

    At the end of a news story, several links are provided for more information. At the beginning of each link is an icon of an arrow with the text equivalent, "Link will open in new window."

  • Example 3: Frames that do not track history making the back button behave unexpectedly

  • Example 4: Forms

EDITORS NOTE:
  Some of these examples are very brief. Should they be expanded and clarified with further details?






PROPOSED


Principle 4: ROBUST.
Use Web technologies that maximize the ability of the content to work with current and future accessibility technologies and user agents.

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Guideline 4: ROBUST. Use Web technologies that maximize the ability of the content to work with current and future accessibility technologies and user agents.


CORE Guidelines for Principle 4

PROPOSED


Guideline 4.1 [C9]
Use technologies according to specification

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 4.1 Technologies are used according to specification.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 4.1

  1. for markup, except where the site has documented that a specification was violated for backward compatibility, the markup has:

    1. passed validity tests of the language (whether it be conforming to a schema, Document Type Definition (DTD), or other tests described in the specification)

    2. structural elements and attributes are used as defined in the specification

    3. accessibility features are used

    4. deprecated features are avoided

    EDITORS NOTE:
      The following two success criteria seem to overlap with checkpoint 4.3. There is an open question about whether they should be deleted since checkpoint 4.3 covers programmatic interfaces.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 4.1

  1. Same as item #1 above, without the exception for backward compatibility.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 4.1
  • This checkpoint further emphasizes that following specifications increases the likelihood of accessible content. While other checkpoints refers to individual pieces of content, this checkpoint takes a step back to look at the broad picture. It also exists to help cover future technologies or issues that we did not anticipate at the time of writing this checkpoint. Thus, the benefits of following specifications are primarily that assistive technologies and user agents can render the content according to spec.



Who Else Benefits from 4.1 (??)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 4.1
  • Example 1: Structural elements

    Throughout a Web site, structural elements are not used for purposes of presentation. Likewise, presentational elements are not used for purposes of structure.

  • Example 2: Accessible API's

    A Java applet uses the accessibility API defined by the language. Refer to the IBM Guidelines for Writing Accessible Applications Using 100% Pure Java.




PROPOSED


Guideline 4.2 [C10]
Make programmatic user interfaces accessible or provide accessible alternatives
OR
Make User Interfaces accessible or provide accessible alternatives

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 4.2 Programmatic user interfaces are accessible or alternative, accessible versions are provided.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 4.2

  1. any custom user interface elements of the content conform to at least Level A of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. If the custom user interfaces cannot be made accessible, an alternative solution is provided that meets WCAG 2.0 (including this provision) to the level claimed.

    EDITORS NOTE:
     This checkpoint includes a slightly reworded version of the suggestions from CKW reorganization. However, the following elements appeared to be redundant with the first sentence. Can they be removed?

    1. If the application renders visual text, it should conform to the VisualText checkpoints.

    2. If the application renders images, it should conform to the Image checkpoints.

    3. If the application renders animations, it should conform to the Animation checkpoints.

    4. If the application renders video, it should conform to the Video checkpoints.

    5. If the application renders audio, it should conform to the Audio checkpoints.

    6. If the application performs its own event handling, it should conform to the Events checkpoints.

    7. If the application implements a selection mechanism, it should conform to the Selection checkpoints.

    8. The application should support keyboard access per UAAG 1.0 checkpoints 1.1 and 6.7.

    9. If the application implements voice or pointer input, it should conform to the Input Modality checkpoints.

    10. accessibility conventions of the markup or programming language (API's or specific markup) are used (@@in UAAG somewhere?)

  2. plug-ins required to access the content conform to at least Level A of UAAG 1.0. If required plug-ins are not accessible, an alternative solution is provided that conforms to WCAG 2.0.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 4.2

  1. accessibility conventions of the markup or programming language (API's or specific markup) are used [I#331]

  2. the interface has been tested using a variety of assistive technologies and preferably real people with disabilities who use assistive technologies to determine that those assistive technologies are able to access all information on the page or hidden within the page.



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 4.2
  • EDITORS NOTE:
     This section needs to be updated to reflect above changes in checkpoint and success criteria.

    Authors who utilize technologies designed to support accessibility will:

    • encounter fewer challenges when implementing these Principles

    • avoid the need to create custom solutions and workarounds to address accessibility concerns

    • avoid the need to provide accessible alternate versions for content rendered in a technology that does not fully address these Principles

  • Individuals who rely on assistive technologies to access the Web will be able interact with the content.

  • Individuals who access the Web with older technologies or alternative browsing devices such as PDAs and cell phones also benefit from the inclusion of accessible alternatives to custom user interfaces.



Who Else Benefits from 4.2 (??)



EXTENDED Guidelines for Principle 4

PROPOSED


Guideline 4.3 [E10]
Assure that technologies required to render the content are listed and widely available
OR
Use widely available technologies to render content, and list the technologies that are required

OLD WORDING and VOICE:


Checkpoint 4.3 Technologies that are relied upon by the content are declared and widely available.


NORMATIVE

REQUIRED CRITERIA for 4.3

  1. the Web resource includes a list of the technologies (other than standard HTML) users must have in order for its content to work as intended. Users who do not have one or more of these technologies can still access and use the resource, though the experience may be degraded.

    NOTE:
    When determining your list of technological requirements, consider that assistive hardware and software is often slow to adapt to technological advances, and the availability of assistive technology varies across natural languages. Verify that assistive technology compatible with the technologies you choose is available in the natural language(s) of your content.

EDITORS NOTE:
  This checkpoint is currently in the set of extended checkpoints. The implications of this are that there is no core checkpoint that says content must transform gracefully or that it must be backwards compatible. However, if the set of core checkpoints is designed well, core conformance would result in content that transforms gracefully. This checkpoint might be too subjective or difficult to test and may be deleted.

INFORMATIVE

BEST PRACTICES for 4.3

  1. a list of technologies and features, support for which is required in order for the content to be operable, has been determined and is documented in metadata and / or a policy statement associated with the content.

  2. technologies and features on the required list are available in at least two independently-developed implementations. (it is preferable that the technologies used for the implementations have been supported for at least one prior version of the software)



INFORMATIVE
Who Benefits from 4.3

EDITORS NOTE:
  A definition of "widely available" should be added here to include something which is low cost and available in many?/most? countries/languages.

Benefits of determining and documenting baseline user agent requirements:

  • Individuals can identify (either through site documentation or automatically through metadata) whether or not they are likely to be able to use a site. In conjunction with a search engine or a proxy server, this could be used to automatically filter out sites a user can not access or to automatically filter to the top sites that would be most usable.

  • Requiring sites to document their baseline will cause them to evaluate assumptions about user agents and will minimize the number of sites that are inadvertently inaccessible because they are unaware of backward compatibility issues.

Benefits of designing for backward compatibility:

  • Individuals who must use alternative browsing technologies and devices will be able to access the content.

  • Individuals who can not afford or otherwise do not have access to newer technologies also benefit from backward compatibility in that they will not need to purchase upgrades or equipment as often.



Who Else Benefits from 4.3 (??)
INFORMATIVE
Examples of 4.3
  • Example 1: An online store

    By documenting minimum user agent requirements, the store makes it possible for people using particular technologies to determine if they are going to have trouble using the store or its checkout mechanism without having to go through the entire process of shopping and checkout only to find out that they are unable to complete their transaction at the end. They can, therefore, shop at stores they can be successful at.

  • Example 2: An Intranet site

    A large company was concerned about the ability to address individuals at many diverse sites that have different technology bases. They have, therefore, created two versions of their content and documented the requirements for each, making it easy for individual sites to determine which version would work for their technologies.




Appendix A:Glossary

INFORMATIVE

EDITORS NOTE:
  The WCAG WG has not tackled the definitions of the terms that we are using and acknowledges that we sometimes use terms inconsistently. We need to coordinate our terms and definitions with the WAI Glossary and are working on proposals for a variety of definitions. We have been looking at the UAAG 1.0 glossary and other glossaries within the W3C.

ability to be expressed in words

content that can be expressed accurately and unambiguously in a reasonable number of words (for example, diagrams, charts, illustrations, etc.) Content such as a musical performance or visual artwork is considered "content that can not be expressed in words," since this type of content relies heavily on the visual (or auditory) experience.[I#320]

audio description

An audio description is a verbal description of all significant visual information in scenes, actions, and events that cannot be perceived from the sound track alone to the extent possible given the constraints posed by the existing audio track and limitations on freezing the audio visual program to insert additional auditory description.

Note:

When adding audio description to existing materials, the amount of information conveyed through audio description is constrained by the amount of space available in the existing audio track unless the audio/video program is periodically frozen to insert audio description. However, it is often impossible or inappropriate to freeze the audio/visual program to insert additional audio description.

audio descriptions

Audio descriptions are equivalents of visual information from actions, body language, graphics, and scene changes that are voiced (either by a human or a speech synthesizer) and synchronized with the multimedia presentation.

captions

Captions are text equivalents of auditory information from speech, sound effects, and ambient sounds that are synchronized with the multimedia presentation.

collated script

EDITORS NOTE:
 @@ that provides dialog, important sounds and important visual information in a single text document

competitive activity

A competitive activity is an activity where timing is an essential part of the design of the activity. Removal of the time element would change the performance of the participants. Versions of the activity (for example test) that have no time basis or time limits might be preferred and may be required for some venues but this would require a complete redesign of the activity (for example test) and may change the character and validation methodology and would therefore not fall under these Principles.

complex content

Content is considered complexif the relationships between pieces of information are not easy to figure out. If the presentation of the information is intended to highlight trends or relationships between concepts, these should be explicitly stated in the summary.

Examples of complex information:

  • data tables,

  • concepts that are esoteric or difficult to understand,

  • content that involves several layers.

content

Content

EDITORS NOTE:
 We need to include a definition for content here.

controlled languages

Controlled languages use a restricted vocabulary taken from natural language. The purpose is to make texts easier to understand and translate. Standards generally limit words to a single meaning and prescribed part of speech. Complex syntax is avoided. Information about controlled language applications is available on the World Wide Web.

feature

A featureis a specific component of a technology, for example an element in a markup language or a function call in an Application Programming Interface. Typically, a given feature may only be available in specific versions of the technology, and thus may need to be noted explicitly in the required list.

functionality

Functionality is the purpose or intended effect of the content. This may include presentation of information , data collection, securing a response from the user, providing user experience, linking to other content, testing, confirmation, purchasing, etc.

keyboard interface

A keyboard interface is the point where the application accepts any input that would come from the keyboard (or optional keyboard).

mechanisms that cause extreme changes in context

Mechanisms that cause extreme changes in context include:

  • opening a new browser window unexpectedly and without any nonvisual cue (back button suddenly appears nonfunctional)

  • in an auditory presentation, the speaker changes with no visual cue and no notation in captions

  • captions that do not identify a change in speaker

Common user actions include:

  • mouse movements

  • key activation

  • link selection

  • use of browser navigation buttons (for example back and forward)

  • opening new browser windows

Common responses to user actions include:

  • loading a new page

  • exposing/concealing content based on mouse position or keyboard focus

  • displaying the contents of a menu (auditorily or visually)

  • displaying pop-up menus or windows

  • submitting a form

It is important that responses to user actions be predictable and sensible to the end user and that interactions are consistent, both throughout the site and with commonly used interaction metaphors used throughout the Web.

media equivalents

Media equivalents present essential audio information visually (captions) and essential video information auditorily (audio descriptions).

natural languages

Natural languages are those used by humans to communicate, including spoken, written, and signed languages.

non-text content

non-text content includes but is not limited to images, text in raster images, image map regions, animations (for example, animated GIFs), ASCII art, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video.

Note:

Scripts, applets, and programmatic objects are not covered in this definition and are addressed in checkpoint 4.3.

operable

The term operableincludes the concept of efficiency. That is, it implies that the device can be operated from the keyboard in a reasonably efficient fashion. Using MouseKeys or having to tab dozens of times to move through a small section of a document or page, or other unreasonably inefficient keyboard access would not qualify. If a document has a very large number of links, some mechanism other than tabbing through them one at a time needs to be provided. This might include provision of headers (for header navigation), the use of skip navigation, links, etc.[I#346]

presentation

Presentationis the rendering of the content and structure in a form that can be sensed by the user.

real-time events

Real-time events are those that are based on the occurrence of events in real-time where the events are not under the control of the author.

site navigation mechanism

A site navigation mechanism is a mechanism for easily orienting and moving about within the site. Site navigation mechanisms include but are not limited to:

  • A home page with hyperlinks on it and subsequent pages that link to the other pages at the site

  • site map(s)

  • search engine(s)

  • expanding outline(s)

  • dynamic fisheye views showing all linked pages or topics related to any page.

  • 3-D virtual representations of site content

structure

Structureincludes both hierarchical structure of the content and non-hierarchical relationships such as cross-references, or the correspondence between header and data cells in a table.The heirarchical structureof content represents changes in context. For example,

  1. A book is divided into chapters, paragraphs, lists, etc. Chapter titles help the reader anticipate the meaning of the following paragraphs. Lists clearly indicate separate, yet related ideas. All of these divisions help the reader anticipate changes in context.

  2. A bicycle is divided into wheels and a frame. Further, a wheel is divided into a tire and a rim. In an image of the bicycle, one group of circles and lines becomes "wheel" while another group becomes "frame."

technology

A technologyis a

  • markup or programming language

  • application Programming Interface (API)

  • or communication protocol

text equivalent

A text equivalent

  • serves the same function as the non-text content was intended to serve.

  • communicates the same information as the non-text content was intended to convey.

  • may contain structured content or metadata.

Note:

Text-equivalents should be easily convertible to braille or speech, displayed in a larger font or different colors, fed to language translators or abstracting software, etc.

time-dependent presentation

A time-dependent presentation is a presentation that

  • is composed of synchronized audio and visual tracks (e.g., a movie), OR

  • requires the user to respond interactively at specific times in the presentation.

unfamiliar content

Content might be unfamiliarif you are using terms specific to a particular community. For example, many of the terms used in this document are specific to the disability community.

widely available

EDITORS NOTE:
 definition of "widely available" should be added here to include something which is low cost and available in many?/most? countries/languages.

Appendix B: Contributors

INFORMATIVE

Participants in the WCAG Working Group

Appendix C: The differences between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0

INFORMATIVE

Since the release of WCAG 1.0 in May 1999, the WCAG Working Group has received feedback on priorities of checkpoints, the usability of the set of documents, and requests for clarifications on the meaning of specific checkpoints and what is needed to satisfy them. Thus, it is intended that WCAG 2.0, when it eventually becomes a W3C Recommendation:

For a checkpoint by checkpoint comparison, refer to the Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and the WCAG 2.0 Working Draft.

C.1 Improvements in WCAG 2.0

We hope that WCAG 2.0 will have several improvements over WCAG 1.0. While the primary goal of WCAG 2.0 is the same as WCAG 1.0 (to promote accessibility of Web content) additional goals for WCAG 2.0 include improvements that will:

  1. Ensure that requirements may be applied across technologies

  2. Ensure that the conformance requirements are clear

  3. Ensure that the deliverables are easy to use

  4. Write to a more diverse audience

  5. Clearly identify who benefits from accessible content

  6. Ensure that the revision is "backward compatible" with WCAG 1.0

For more information about the intended improvements in WCAG 2.0 Working Draft, please refer to Requirements for WCAG 2.0.

Appendix D: References (Non-Normative)

EDITORS NOTE:
  Links within the document will be turned into references and the links to those documents will be listed here. They are inline for the time being.

Last updated November 17, 2003 by: Katie Haritos-Shea