ISSUE-7: Are AS consumers required to understand the pre-JSON-LD syntax?

AS1 Compatibility

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Activity Streams 2.0

Raised by:

Opened on:

2014-10-29

Description:

Is it a MAY, SHOULD, or MUST?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: AS2 Issues List (from jasnell@gmail.com on 2015-03-31)
Re: AS2 Issues List (from perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org on 2015-03-31)
AS2 Issues List (from jasnell@gmail.com on 2015-03-31)
Re: ISSUE-23: Look at backward compatibility for as 2.0 (from dret@berkeley.edu on 2015-03-17)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2015-03-08)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org on 2015-03-06)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from dret@berkeley.edu on 2015-03-06)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org on 2015-03-06)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from dret@berkeley.edu on 2015-03-06)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org on 2015-03-05)
do we need an ISSUE for the processing model? (from dret@berkeley.edu on 2015-02-16)
ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-10-29)
Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax? (from dret@berkeley.edu on 2014-10-28)

No additional notes.