ISSUE-68: Disambiguation (and term)

Disambiguation (and term)

State:

CLOSED

Product:

MLW-LT Standard Draft

Raised by:

Felix Sasaki

Opened on:

2013-01-10

Description:

See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0014.html

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-435 on Tadej Štajner to Take care of disambig -> tan examples - due 2013-02-06, closed
• ACTION-451 on Christian Lieske to Edit issue-68 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html into the its2 draft - due 2013-03-04, closed
• ACTION-461 on Christian Lieske to Make the edit for issue-68 - due 2013-03-27, closed
• ACTION-472 on Jirka Kosek to Update schema wrt text analysis annotation and check the test suite and spec against updated schema - due 2013-04-07, closed

Related emails:

1. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-04-03 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-04)
2. [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
3. Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-04-01)
4. Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-01)
5. Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-04-01)
6. [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-03-31)
7. Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 27 March, 1 p.m. UTC (from olaf@stefanov.at on 2013-03-27)
8. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 27 March, 1 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-27)
9. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-03-20 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-20)
10. [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) - Steady state for Update of Specification, correct? (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-03-18)
11. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
12. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-27)
13. RE: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-26)
14. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
15. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-26)
16. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-26)
17. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-26)
18. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
19. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
20. [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
21. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
22. AW: [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com on 2013-02-25)
23. [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
24. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
25. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-25)
26. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-22)
27. Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-22)
28. Fwd: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-22)
29. [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-22)
30. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-02-20)
31. Re: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-18)
32. RE: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-18)
33. [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
34. Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
35. RE: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-02-12)
36. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
37. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
38. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-11 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
39. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-06 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
40. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
41. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-11)
42. Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from olaf@stefanov.at on 2013-02-11)
43. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
44. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-07)
45. Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-06)
46. Re: [agenda] MLW-LT call 6th Feb, 1 pm UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-06)
47. [agenda] MLW-LT call 6th Feb, 1 pm UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-06)
48. RE: agenda+ for Wednesday (WG Draft about high level use cases (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434])) (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-02-05)
49. Re: Issue-68 - Disambiguation (and term) - new name for Disambiguation (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-05)
50. Issue-68 - Disambiguation (and term) - new name for Disambiguation (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-05)
51. agenda+ for Wednesday (WG Draft about high level use cases (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434])) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-05)
52. Fwd: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-04)
53. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
54. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-01)
55. Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-31)
56. RE: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-31)
57. Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-31)
58. Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-31)
59. Re: Issue-68 (not 67) - Term + Disambiguation (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
60. RE: Issue-67 - Term + Disambiguation (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-30)
61. AW: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from stephan.walter@cocomore.com on 2013-01-30)
62. issue-68 proposal to structure today's discussion (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
63. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-30)
64. AW: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
65. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
66. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
67. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
68. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
69. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
70. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
71. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
72. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
73. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
74. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
75. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-01-29)
76. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-29)
77. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
78. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-01-29)
79. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
80. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
81. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
82. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
83. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-28)
84. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-28)
85. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-28)
86. RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
87. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-28)
88. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
89. Re: Multilayer proposal, not standoff revision (Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-01-28)
90. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-01-28)
91. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-28)
92. New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
93. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
94. Multilayer proposal, not standoff revision (Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
95. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
96. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-28)
97. [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
98. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
99. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-27)
100. RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-27)
101. Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
102. [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
103. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
104. Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-01-27)
105. issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
106. Re: Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-24)
107. Re: Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-23)
108. Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-23)
109. Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
110. mass regrets - Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-21)
111. RE: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-21)
112. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
113. Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie on 2013-01-16)
114. Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-16)
115. Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
116. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
117. RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
118. RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
119. Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
120. Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
121. RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
122. Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-14)
123. RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-14)
124. RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-11)
125. RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-11)
126. issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
127. [All] last call comment handling (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
128. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-68: Disambiguation (and term) [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-10)

Related notes:

Display change log