ISSUE-108: locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages
Indic languages - locNote
locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- David Lewis
- Opened on:
- 2013-01-21
- Description:
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0055.html
This issue addresses localization note, and has been separated from issues in the above post related to disambiguation and translate. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Review of issues 100-120 (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-04-08)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-02-20)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from schandra@deity.gov.in on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-07)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
- Re: [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-417] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from shaunm@gnome.org on 2013-01-28)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-417] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-24)
- [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-23)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-22)
- Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-21)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-108 (Indic languages - locNote): locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: rejected
David Lewis, 4 Feb 2013, 13:25:21DECISION-DETAILS: Concensus Prague f2f meeting was that: a) this was a new use cases and it was unclear how much demand there was for this; b) it could anyway be handled to some extent either by encoding within the locNote text value or an external format, specifically NIF. See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0171.html
COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied
David Lewis, 18 Feb 2013, 01:55:47CHANGE-TYPE: none
David Lewis, 18 Feb 2013, 01:56:09Display change log