This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 9789 - We should use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB interfaces
Summary: We should use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB interfaces
Alias: None
Product: WebAppsWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Indexed Database API (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrei Popescu
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla
Depends on:
Reported: 2010-05-21 16:22 UTC by Jeremy Orlow
Modified: 2010-06-10 16:27 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Description Jeremy Orlow 2010-05-21 16:22:44 UTC
Andrei Popescu proposed a couple naming changes to the interfaces within IndedexDB deep within the "[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" thread [1].

One of them suggested we consistently use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB interfaces.  Jeremy, Shawn, and Jonas have concurred.

> - I know we need to keep the "IDB" prefix in order to avoid collisions
> with other APIs. I would therefore think we should keep the IDB prefix
> and make sure all the interfaces start with it (right now they don't).

Comment 1 Andrei Popescu 2010-06-10 16:27:38 UTC
Fixed in