This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 7761 - It would be nice to have some kind of comment as to how the checking and downloading events from step 2 interact with the events of the same name in step 3 and beyond.
Summary: It would be nice to have some kind of comment as to how the checking and down...
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-29 15:28 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2010-12-01 15:35 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2009-09-29 15:28:10 UTC 
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#updating-an-application-cache

Comment:
It would be nice to have some kind of comment as to how the checking and downloading events from step 2 interact with the events of the same name in step 3 and beyond.

Posted from: 213.236.208.22
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2009-09-30 09:59:06 UTC 
What would such a comment say or explain?
Comment 2 Anne 2009-09-30 15:31:23 UTC 
Well frankly, I don't get it.

Step 2 substep 8 of the algorithm dispatches checking. And then step 3 dispatches it again, but just at a single ApplicationCache object. Why?
Comment 3 Anne 2009-10-01 13:55:27 UTC 
After re-reading this a few times I think I now get the difference. Bug 7775 is about my remaining confusion.