This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 6943 - Minor editorial issue: nontimezoned or untimezoned
Summary: Minor editorial issue: nontimezoned or untimezoned
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Ezell
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-05-22 15:20 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2009-10-23 16:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2009-05-22 15:20:58 UTC 
Section "3.3.8.2 Lexical Mapping" for "dateTime" introduces notions like "timezoned" and "untimezoned" values, but later on the "3.3.10 date" section uses the word "nontimezoned". Should be consistent.
Comment 1 Dave Peterson 2009-05-22 15:46:10 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> Section "3.3.8.2 Lexical Mapping" for "dateTime" introduces notions like
> "timezoned" and "untimezoned" values, but later on the "3.3.10 date" section
> uses the word "nontimezoned". Should be consistent.

Formal recommendation to the WG:  In 3.3.8.2, first paragraph, change the two occurrences of 'nontimezoned' to 'untimezoned'.

These appear to be the only two occurrences of 'nontimezoned' in the spec.
Comment 2 David Ezell 2009-05-29 16:01:02 UTC 
RESOLUTION: resolve 6843 by replacing all occurrances of "untimezoned" to "nontimezoned".
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2009-07-15 21:12:10 UTC 
The change described in comment 2 has now been integrated into the status-quo documents.  I am accordingly marking this issue resolved.  (The minutes seemed to show a groundswell of opinion in favor of hyphenating 'non-timezoned', so I did that, too.)

Sandy, as the originator, if you would signal your acceptance or rejection of this resolution by closing or reopening the bug in the usual manner, it would be helpful.  If the working group does not hear otherwise from you in the next two weeks, we will assume that you are content with the disposition of this comment.