This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5715 - add definition of the term 'processor'
Summary: add definition of the term 'processor'
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: LC
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kumar Pandit
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-23 07:33 UTC by Kumar Pandit
Modified: 2008-08-13 23:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
fix diff (175.96 KB, text/html)
2008-06-11 03:28 UTC, Kumar Pandit
Details

Description Kumar Pandit 2008-05-23 07:33:09 UTC
The spec uses term 'processor' that is not defined.
Comment 1 Virginia Smith 2008-06-05 18:22:41 UTC
resolution: 5/5 - Mark needsReview when editorial change is done.
Comment 2 Kumar Pandit 2008-06-11 03:28:15 UTC
Created attachment 554 [details]
fix diff
Comment 3 Kumar Pandit 2008-06-11 03:32:34 UTC
Diff of the fix attached (comment# 2).
Comment 4 John Arwe 2008-06-16 17:52:48 UTC
Now that we have an appropriate term (model processor) defined, propose we replace the existing "consumers" (also not defined) sprinkled throughout the non-normative text with model processor.  i.e.

4.1.3 Unresolved SML Reference, Note
from: That is, different consumers, 
to  : That is, different model processors, 

F. Localization and Variable Substitution Sample 
from: Schematron rule available to consumers        using different languages
to  : Schematron rule available to model processors using different languages

F. Localization and Variable Substitution Sample 
from: locale of a potential consumer
to  : locale of a potential model processor
Comment 5 John Arwe 2008-06-16 17:55:10 UTC
Found another typo-level non-normative change in 4.1.3:
from: set of SML reference schemes they understand and used in the model
to  : set of SML reference schemes they understand and use  in the model
Comment 6 Virginia Smith 2008-06-19 18:30:58 UTC
Resolution 6/19:
Fix per comment #4. Also, in place of comment #5, replace "used" with "which are used" rather than "use" that is suggested in comment #5.
No 'needsReview' necessary.
Comment 7 Kumar Pandit 2008-08-13 23:56:10 UTC
fixed per comment# 6.