This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5635 - impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
Summary: impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core+Interchange Format (show other bugs)
Version: LC
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: James Lynn
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-10 15:26 UTC by John Arwe
Modified: 2008-06-05 18:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description John Arwe 2008-04-10 15:26:20 UTC 
IIRC we agreed to use the Schema 1.1 definitions for these terms, but I see no evidence of that decision in either spec.  Indeed, I see no definition for either term in either spec.  Should we add one, by value or by reference?

Editors, note: SML contains a mix of "with -" and "without -" uses of these terms,  in case that tickles anyone's consistency bone.
Comment 2 Virginia Smith 2008-04-10 18:45:09 UTC 
Resolution 4/10: editors to define terms in SML and SML-IF specs for implementation-defined and implementation-dependent. Refer to Schema 1.1 and XPath 2, XQuery to inform the creation of these definitions.

Mark as needsReview when change is made.
Comment 3 James Lynn 2008-04-24 13:04:30 UTC 
Added definitions for both terms in both specs - Section 2.2
Comment 4 Kumar Pandit 2008-05-08 01:16:40 UTC 
+1 for the changes with one comment: The term 'processor' is not defined elsewhere in the spec.
Comment 5 John Arwe 2008-05-08 12:42:26 UTC 
wrt http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5635#c4 , I think this should be a separate bug.  It is actually true of both specs.  SML even uses 'processor' in its conformance section (yikes! not a good place for undefined terms).
Comment 6 Pratul Dublish 2008-05-22 18:55:59 UTC 
Resolution in  5/22 call