This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5527 - Why is NCName optional?
Summary: Why is NCName optional?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: LC
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kumar Pandit
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: externalComments, resolved, reviewerSatisfied
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-04 16:53 UTC by Pratul Dublish
Modified: 2008-05-14 04:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Pratul Dublish 2008-03-04 16:53:42 UTC
Minor comment from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html 

4.5.1.2: Since XML Schema uses XPath 1.0 rules for names, surely the
NCName: isn't optional, it _must_ be present, and in any case, it
should be stated that there must be an NS Binding for that prefix to
the SML namespace in scope.
Comment 1 Pratul Dublish 2008-03-06 17:12:44 UTC
Most probably this is about "5.2.1.2 Schema Validity Rules"
Comment 2 Pratul Dublish 2008-03-31 22:04:09 UTC
Resolution in 3/31 F2F, we will make the NCName mandatory

The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this
issue, to whom the following request is addressed.

Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this
resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing
the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this
resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the
decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we
do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the
WG decision.
Comment 3 Kumar Pandit 2008-04-16 06:47:47 UTC
Definition of DerefExpr changed to make NCName mandatory as shown below:

from:
DerefExpr ::= (NCName ':')? 'deref(' Step ('/'Step)* ')' ('/'Step)* |
              (NCName ':')? 'deref(' DerefExpr ')' ('/'Step)*

to:
DerefExpr ::= NCName ':' 'deref(' Step ('/'Step)* ')' ('/'Step)* |
              NCName ':' 'deref(' DerefExpr ')' ('/'Step)*
Comment 4 Henry S. Thompson 2008-04-18 13:37:29 UTC
I'm happy with this change.