This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Representative example text 1: SML ...identify a resource. <Link 4.2.1 URI Scheme> and endpoint references (EPRs) [WS-Addressing Core] are two common schemes for referencing resources. Representative example text 2: SML vs SMLIF compare above excerpt for the uri scheme with smlif in a similar case SML [SML 1.1] defines two reference schemes, the sml:uri scheme and the EPR scheme Need to search both specs and consistently refer to them as peers in each, e.g. if linking to SML spec section for one then do so for the other. The style might be different for each spec, eg linking to SML 4.2.1 from SML but not SMLIF, but should always be consistent within a single spec and as consistent as possible across the pair (e.g. pick "URI scheme" or "sml:uri scheme", not both).
3.4.3 SML reference schemes that are not SML-IF inter-document references has another case
(prev ref was in SMLIF) SMLIF 3.4.3 has another case: "an EPR scheme reference (which is not an inter-document reference in SML-IF) could also contain an sml:uri scheme reference"
fixed as suggested.