This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4943 - Action 338 - Compatibility Matching at Nested Level
Summary: Action 338 - Compatibility Matching at Nested Level
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS-Policy
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Primer (show other bugs)
Version: PR
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Web Services Policy WG QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-13 16:54 UTC by Monica Martin
Modified: 2007-09-12 16:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Monica Martin 2007-08-13 16:54:47 UTC
Target: WS-Policy Primer
Target location: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ws-policy-primer-20070810/
Description: For Issue 4857 in the Ireland F2F, we discussed how to describe the relationship between nested policy expressions and parent policy assertions, and as it relates to compatibility matching. For the Primer, Section 3.4, this issue articulates a short description and example.

Proposal: See attached for Section 3.4. Changes are in highlighted yellow block in the .pdf and .doc. 
MaryAnn Hondo
Fabian Ritzmann
Monica J. Martin

References:
Section 3.4 Primer, http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ws-policy-primer-20070810/#compatible-policies
Issue 4857 and resolution: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4857#c2
Action 338: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/338
Review section 3.4 and propose changes to example alternatives that would permit an explanation of the compatibility matching at the nested policy level
Comment 1 Monica Martin 2007-08-13 17:01:52 UTC
See email with .pdf and .doc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Aug/0003.html
Comment 2 Monica Martin 2007-08-21 02:50:41 UTC
Link from 15 August 2007.
see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Aug/0004.html
Comment 3 Monica Martin 2007-08-22 16:05:39 UTC
Updated draft examples concepts (need more review and assistance) using WS-SecurityPolicy.

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Aug/0018.html

MaryAnn Hondo
Fabian Ritzmann
Monica J. Martin
Comment 4 Monica Martin 2007-08-29 22:09:18 UTC
29 August 2007: Updated with simple examples that do not require health warnings using WS-Security Policy. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Aug/0020.html. This includes a .doc and .pdf of the revised text and examples, including requested comments and suggestions.
Comment 5 Christopher Ferris 2007-09-12 16:39:38 UTC
RESOLUTION: Issue 4943 closed with proposal from Monica as amended by Asir in  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Sep/0005.html as amended by above sentence from Chris: This is because the parent policy assertions EndorsingSupportingTokens and SignedSupportingTokens  have different QNames.
See http://www.w3.org/2007/09/12-ws-policy-irc#T16-39-22