This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
[[ 2.15 Equivalence of Components Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value on the second component, and vice versa. Instances of properties of the same type are considered equivalent if their values are equivalent. ]] Re "property with an equivalent value", Should this not point instead to the rule in the next sentence?
Here is my proposed edit: Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value, as defined in the following sentence, on the second component, and vice versa.
"Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property value of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value on the second component, and vice versa."