This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4316 - Make sure namespace prefixes are used appropriately throughout structures
Summary: Make sure namespace prefixes are used appropriately throughout structures
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: editorial cluster
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-09 20:07 UTC by Noah Mendelsohn
Modified: 2008-10-08 15:35 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Noah Mendelsohn 2007-02-09 20:07:22 UTC
During the XML Schema teleconference of 9 February (draft minutes at [1]) a decision was made to add to Schema Structures a table of associations between namespace names used in the Recommendation and conventional prefixes such as xsi:, xs:, etc.  We noted during our discussion that the resulting global documentation of the associations might facilitate more widespread use of the prefixes elsewhere in the Recommendation, perhaps allowing for removal of some explicit references to the full namespace names.

I was given an action to open a bugzilla report for tracking this, and this report is the result.   There seemed to be at least informal agreement among those on the call that this issue is purely editorial, and thus needs no attention at all until after last call.

(FWIW:  while preparing this note I did notice that the current structures public WD already says:  The XML representation of schema components uses a vocabulary identified by the namespace name http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema. For brevity, the text and examples in this specification use the prefix xs: to stand for this namespace; in practice, any prefix can be used.  So, it seems to me that we've always been in a position to use the prefixes elsewhere in the Rec, but in any case this report suggests that we take another pass to be sure we're happy with how namespace references are set out.)

Noah

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2007Feb/0050.html
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2007-02-23 18:41:06 UTC
On the call of 23 February 2007 the Working agreed to class this issue as
editorial.
Comment 2 Sandy Gao 2008-10-08 15:35:51 UTC
On 2008-09-26, the working group adopted a proposal to address this issue by making sure that all prefixes used in the specification are consistent with the list in section "1.3.3 Conventional Namespace Bindings".

The proposal (along with changes for other bugs) can be found at (member-only):
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.editorial0809.html