This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Title: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy assertion design? Description: The Guidelines document is for assertion authors. Section 4 describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions. Compact vs. normal form ('Authoring Styles') is not relevant to policy assertion design. WS-Policy Primer describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions. Justification: The Guidelines document should focus on guidelines for policy assertion authors. 'Authoring Styles' is not in the minimum to declare victory on the Guidelines document. Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors. Proposal: Drop Section 4. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#compact-full
[14:41] scribe: RESOLUTION: Issue 3981 as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0000.html [14:41] cferris: rrsagent, where am i? [14:41] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-42-17