This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3963 - Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
Summary: Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: All All
: P4 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
: 4470 5258 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-08 21:23 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2009-04-21 19:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2006-11-08 21:23:25 UTC
In schema 1.1 structures draft, the constraint "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" currently reads:

"The item's ·actual value· matches the {value} of the {value constraint}, if it is present and its {variety} is fixed.

For an attribute information item to be·valid· with respect to an attribute use its ·actual value· must be identical to the {value} of the attribute use's {value constraint}, if it is present and has {variety} fixed."

where the first paragraph looks very suspecious.

And obviously a space is needed between "be" and "·valid·".
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2007-12-20 21:37:04 UTC
Cf. bug 4470
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-01-25 21:20:27 UTC
*** Bug 5258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-01-25 21:21:43 UTC
*** Bug 4470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-04 16:17:24 UTC
In an effort to make better use of Bugzilla, we are going to use the
'severity' field to classify issues by perceived difficulty.  This 
bug is getting severity=minor to reflect the existing whiteboard note
'easy'. 
Comment 5 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-08 02:19:41 UTC
A wording proposal including changes for this issue went to the WG
on 7 February 2008:

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html#composition

(member-only link).
Comment 6 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-08 19:56:01 UTC
The 'Structures Omnibus 1' proposal mentioned in an earlier comment
was adopted by the XML Schema Working Group today.

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html (member-only link)

The XML Schema WG believes that the changes adopted today resolve this
issue fully.  I'm changing its status accordingly.

The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of
this issue, to whom the following request is addressed.

Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.