This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3869 - Annotation mapping for simple type and facets
Summary: Annotation mapping for simple type and facets
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: cluster: alignment
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-27 15:15 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2009-04-21 19:21 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2006-10-27 15:15:44 UTC
The structures is moving to a new way of mapping the {annotations} property that is consistent across all components. The datatypes half needs to be updated to follow the same convention.
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2007-10-30 03:06:22 UTC
Concretely, I think this issue means:  where the XML mapping rules
currently say things like 

  {annotations}  The annotations corresponding to all the <annotation> 
                 element information items in the [children], if any.

it should say something like 

  {annotations}  The annotation mapping of the ... element, as defined 
                 in XSDL 1.1 Part 1 Structures, "XML Representation of 
                 Annotation Schema Components (sect. 3.15.2).
 
This has the disadvantage of looking more complicated, but the advantage of
correctly handling attributes in foreign namespaces, which match the
attribute wildcard on (some element of) the source declaration.
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-05 03:36:39 UTC
A wording proposal for this issue (among others) was placed on the
server on 4 February 2008 at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.omnibus.200801.html (member-only link).
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-08 18:46:55 UTC
The wording proposal mentioned in an earlier comment was considered
and adopted today by the XML Schema Working Group.  Accordingly, I'm
marking this issue resolved.

Since the originator of the issue is a member of the WG, the adoption 
of the proposal by the WG is probably sufficient evidence that the
originator is content with the WG's resolution of the issue.  But if
the editors don't get around to it, it would be convenient if the 
originator could take the time to shift the status of the issue
from RESOLVED to CLOSED.  Thanks.